Whose interactive' channel? Exploring the concept of interactivity defined in Taiwan's 2000 presidential election online campaigns

Asian Journal of Communication

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 50-78

  Wang, Tai Li ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84997929198     PISSN: 01292986     EISSN: 17420911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01292980209364823     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. 2000. Abian's political ads tactics. Liberty Times, March 25
2. 2000. Analysis of Abian's campaign strategies. Power News, March 20
3. Ang, Y.‐S. (2000) In personal interview, February 1, 2000; in a telephone interview, March 20, 2000.
4. Chen, L., 1996. Presidential voting in the 1996 Taiwan's presidential election: an analysis. Election Studies, 5(2): 161–184.
5. Chou and Peng. 1999. Political marketing strategies on the WWW, Graduate Institute of Communications in Tamkang University. Unpublished master's thesis
6. Davis, R., 1999. The Web of politics: The Internet's impact on the American political system, NY: Oxford University Press.
7. Diamond, E., and Geller, G., 1995. Will press coverage be virtual in the online political world?. The National Journal, 27(37): 2302
8. Dutton, W. H., and Taylor, J., 1996. “ The information polity: electronic democracy, privacy, and surveillance ”. In Information and Communication Technologies‐Visions and Realities, 284–299. Oxford University Press.
9. Dutton, W. H., Taylor, J., 1994. Electronic service delivery: Themes and issues in the public sector, Policy Research Paper No. 29 Uxbridge: PICT, Brunei University.
10. 2000. Election anxiety hit undecided voters. China Times, March 1
11. Foucault, M., 1991. Remarks on Marx: Conversations with Duccio Trombadori, New York: Emiotexte.
12. th WWW User Survey. [Online] Available: http://guv.gatech.edu/user_surveys/survey‐1998–04/.
13. Heeter, C., Brown, N., 1991. Agenda‐setting by electronic text news. Journalism Quarterly,: 101–107.
14. Holsti, O. R., 1969. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities, Reading, MA: Addison‐Wesley.
15. Hu, Y., and Lee, C., 1999. Profiles of the Internet users’ electoral campaign information. Theories & Policies, 51: 65–86.
16. Jacques, W.W., and Ratzan, S.C., 1997. The Internet's World Wide Web and political accountability. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(8): 1226–1237.
17. Kamark, E., 1998. Campaigning on the Internet in off years elections of 1998: A snapshot in time.
18. Katz, E., Blumer, J., and Gurevitch, M., 1974. “ Utilization of mass communication by the individual ”. In The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research, Edited by: Blumer, J., and Katz, E., Beverly Hills: Sage. 1974
19. Kling, R., 1996. “ Hopes and horrors: Technological utopianism and anti‐utopianism in narratives of computerization ”. In Computerization & Controversy, Boston: Academic Press.
20. Lyon, D., 1994. “ From big brother to electronic panopticon ”. In The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society, 57–80. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21. Martin, J. P., 1998. Nationwide, candidates spin the Internet.: 1–4. [Online] Available: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wrary/mdelect/candidatestites.htm
22. Massey, B. L., and Levy, M. R., 1999. Interactivity, online Journalism and English‐language Web newspapers in Asia. Journalism and Mass Communications Quarterly, 76(1): 138–151.
23. McMillan, S. J., 2000. The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1): 80–98.
24. McMillan, S. J., 2002a. “ Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: users, documents and systems ”. In Handbook of new media: Social shaping & consequences of ICTs, Edited by: Lievrouw, L.A., and Lingstone, S., Sage Publication.
25. McMillan, S. J., 2002b. A four‐part model of cyber‐interactivity. New Media Society, 14(2): 271–291.
26. 1999. “ Ministry of Economics Report ”. In The Annual report of the National Internet Infrastructure Development
27. Morris, D., 2000. Vote.com, Los Angeles: Renaissance Books.
28. March 26 2001. NetValue Report March 26, San Francisco Cited from Reuters News 2001
29. Peng, C.M. (2000) In personal interview, March 20, 2000.
30. Perloff, R. M., 1998. Political communication: Politics, press and public in America, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Rafaeli, S., 1988. “ Interactivity: From new media to communication ”. In Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal process, Edited by: Hawkins, R., Weimann, J., and Pingree, S., 124–181. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Rash, W., Jr. 1997. The politics on the nets: wiring the political process, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
33. Reney, R. F., 1998b. Former wrestler's campaign got boost from the Internet. Technology Cybertime, Available at http://www.nytimes.com/library/cyber/articles/06campaign.htm.
34. Resnick, D., 1998. “ Politics on the Internet: The normalization of cyberspace ”. In The governance of cyberspace: Politics, Technologyand global restructuring, Edited by: Loader, B. D., 155–174. New York: Routledge.
35. Roper, J., 1998. “ New Zealand political parties online: The WWW as a tool for democratization or for political marketing? ”. In The politics of Cyberspace, Edited by: Chris, T., New York and London: Routledge.
36. Roper, J., 1998. “ New Zealand political parties online: The WWW as a tool for democratization or for political marketing? ”. In The politics of Cyberspace, Edited by: Toulouse, C., and Luke, T. W., New York: Routledge.
37. Schalken, C., and Tops, P., 1995. “ Democracy and virtual communities: An empirical exploration of the Amsterdam digital city ”. Edited by: Van de Donk. 143–54.
38. SeedNet. 1998. The 1998 Internet Users Poll. [Online] Available: http://www.seednet.com.tw/polls/1998.htm]
39. Severin, W. J., and Tankard, J. W., 2000. Communication theories: Origins, methods and uses in the mass media, NY: Longman.
40. Steuer, J., 1992. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42: 73–93.
41. Stromer‐Galley, J., 2000. Online interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication, Autumn 2000
42. Sun, S., 1996. Analysis of the effects of voters’ mass media use on political behaviors in the 1996 Taiwan's presidential election. Election Studies, 3(2): 71–106.
43. 2000. Taiwan: A democratic milestone. Time, March 27: 14–21.
44. Tedesco, Miller and Spiker. 1998. “ Political campaigning on the information superhighway: An exploration of content and form ”. In The electronic election, Edited by: Kaid and Bystrom. 51–63. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. 2000. The report of the 2000 Internet survey. Common Wealth Magazine, April
46. Tremayne, M., and Dunwoody, S., Interactivity as a cognitive process. Paper presented at Association of Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. 2001, Washington, D.C.
47. Westen, T., 1998. Can technology save democracy?. National Civic View, 87(1): 47–56.
48. Whillock, R. K., 1997. Cyber‐Politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(8): 1208–1225.
49. Wilheim, A. G., 2000. Democracy in the digital age: Challenges to political life in Cyberspace, New York: Routledge.
50. Wu, T.‐H. (2000) In personal interviews, February 2 and March 9; in telephone interview, March 19, 2000.
51. Yeh, S.‐C. (2000) In personal interview, February 5, 2000; in telephone interview, March 20, 2000.
52. Yin, R. K., 1989. Case study research: Design and methods, California: Sage.