Good Deeds and Misdeeds: A Mediated Model of the Effect of Corporate Social Performance on Organizational Attractiveness

Business & Society

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 397-415

  Luce, Rebecca A ^a   Barber, Alison E ^b   Hillman, Amy J ^c  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84997880665     PISSN: 00076503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000765030104000403     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H.,& Wells, R. B. (1997). A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 25-37.
2. Barber, A. E., Wesson, M. J., Roberson, Q. M.,& Taylor, M. S. (1999). Atale of two job markets: Organizational size and its effects on hiring practices and job search behavior. Personnel Psychology, 52, 841-867.
3. Baron, R. M.,& Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Bazerman, M. (1998). Judgment in managerial decision making. New York: John Wiley.
5. Behling, O., Labovitz, G., & Gainer, M. (1968). College recruiting: A theoretical base. Personnel Journal, 47, 13-19.
6. Belt, J. A.,& Paolillo, J.G.P. (1982). The influence of corporate image and specificity of candidate qualifications on response to recruitment advertisement. Journal of Management, 8, 105-112.
7. Carroll, A. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
8. Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.
9. DiMaggio, P. J.,& Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
10. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233-258.
11. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
12. Gatewood, R. D., Gowan, M. A., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (1993). Corporate image, recruitment image, and initial job choice decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 414-427.
13. Good works—and great profits. (1999, February 16). Business Week, 8.
14. Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1035-1046.
15. Greenhaus, J. H., Sugalski, T., & Crispin, G. (1978). Relationships between perceptions of organizational size and the organizational choice perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13, 113-125.
16. Highhouse, S., Zickar, M. J., Thorsteinson, T. J., Stierwalt, S. L., & Slaughter, J. E. (1999). Assessing company employment image: An example in the fast food industry. Personnel Psychology, 52, 151-172.
17. Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404-437.
18. Meyerson, A. R. (1999, January 31). Techies discover the joys of giving. New York Times, pp. 1-11.
19. Neter, J., Wasserman, W.,& Kutner, M. H. (1990). Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
20. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
21. Reich, R. R. (1998). The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 40(2), 8-17.
22. Reynolds, L. G. (1951). The structure of labor markets. New York: Harper.
23. Riordan, C. M., Gatewood, R. D.,& Bill, J. B. (1997). Corporate image: Employee reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 401-412.
24. Rynes, S. L.,& Miller, H. E. (1983). Recruiter and job influences on candidates for employment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 147-154.
25. Sharfman, M. (1996). The construct validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg, and Domini social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 287-296.
26. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355-374.
27. Stigler, G. J. (1962). Information in the labor market. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 49-73.
28. Strand, R., Levine, R., & Montgomery, D. (1981). Organizational entry preferences based upon social and personnel policies: An information integration perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 27, 50-68.
29. Swanson, D. (1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20, 43-64.
30. Tom, V. R. (1971). The role of personality and organizational images in the recruiting process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 573-592.
31. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658-672.
32. Turban, D. B., & Keon, T. L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 184-193.
33. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
34. Waddock, S. A.,& Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303-319.
35. Wartick, S.,& Cochran, P. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758-769.
36. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.