Unreliable Research: Are librarians liable?

The IFLA Journal

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 28-34

  Curry, Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84997868423     PISSN: 03400352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0340035205052640     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Article 19: The United Nations’ Declaration of Human Rights. (n.d.) (IFLA/FAIFE), Available: http://www.ifla.org/faife/art19.htm. (Accessed: October 1, 2004)
2. Babbage, C. (1969) Reflections on the decline of science in England. Farnborough: Gregg. (First published 1830)
3. Berger, S. (1992) Forgeries and their detection in the rare book world. Libraries and Culture, 27 (1), 59–69.
4. Broad, W. (1982) Betrayers of the truth. New York: Simon and Schuster.
5. Fraud and Misconduct in Library and Information Science Research. (1996) Library and Information Science Research, 18, 199–206.
6. Homan, P. (2003) A record enriched: a case for a library catalog note for Michael Bellesiles's Arming America: the origins of a national gun culture. Part 2. Idaho Librarian, 54 (4). Available: http://www.idaholibraries.org/newidaholibrarian/200305/RecordEnrichedII.htm (Accessed August 12, 2004).
7. Hughes, C. (1998) Academic medical libraries’ policies and procedures for notifying library users of retracted scientific publications. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 17 (2), 37–42.
8. Kochan, C.A. and Budd, J. (1992) The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (7), 488–493.
9. Kohn, A. (1986) False prophets. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
10. LaFollette, M. (2000) Observations on fraud and scientific integrity in a digital environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (14), 1334–1337.
11. Libraries and intellectual freedom (February 26, 2004— last update). IFLANET. Available: http://www.ifla.org/faife/faife/presen.htm (Accessed October 3, 2004).
12. Merton, R. (1973) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Mill, J.S. (1985) On liberty. London: Penguin. (First published 1859)
14. Montagnes, I. (1993) Introduction to the issue: the Freeman affair. Scholarly Publishing, 24 (July), 193–203.
15. Piper, P. (2000) Better read that again: web hoaxes and misinformation. Searcher, 8 (8), 40–50.
16. Sierpe, E. (2003) Gender and its relationship to perception to computer-mediated communication. Unpublished PhD diss. McGill University. Montreal.
17. Sowards, S.W. (1988) Historical fabrications in library collections. Collection Management, 10(3/4), 81–88.
18. United States. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.) Fact Sheet: Errata, retraction, duplicate publication and comment policy for MEDLINE. Available: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/errata.html (Accessed August 11, 2004).
19. Warman v., British Columbia Library Association. (2004). Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
20. Westfall, R. (1973) Newton and the fudge factor. Science, 179, 751–758.
21. Young, J.R. (2001) Committee of scholars proposes ethics guidelines for research in cyberspace. Chronicle of Higher Education, November 2, 51-51.