Academic medical libraries’ policies and procedures for notifying library users of retracted scientific publications

Medical Reference Services Quarterly

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 37-42

  Hughes, Carole ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; INFORMATION SERVICE; LIBRARY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLICY; PUBLISHING; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; CANADA; INFORMATION SERVICES; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETRACTION OF PUBLICATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032082487     PISSN: 02763869     EISSN: 15409597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J115v17n02_04     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Pfeifer, M.P., and Snodgrass, G.L. “Medical School Libraries’ Handling of Articles that Report Invalid Science.” Acad Med 67 (February 1992): 109–13.
2. Duggar, D.C.; Christopher, K A.; Tucker, B.E. et al. “Promoting an Awareness of Retractions: The Louisiana State University Medical Center in Shreveport Experience.” Med Ref Sen Quart 14 (Spring 1995): 17–32.
3. Snodgrass, G.L., and Pfeifer, M.P. “The Characteristics of Medical Retraction Notices.” Bull Med Lib Assoc 80 (October 1992): 328–34.
4. Colaianni, L.A, “Retraction, Comment, and Errata Policies of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.” Lancet 340 (August 29,1992): S36–7.
5. University of Maryland at Baltimore Health Sciences Library. “Retracted Articles Project: Procedure.” Unpublished manuscript.
6. Pfeifer, M.P., and Snodgrass, G.L. “The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature.” JAMA 263 (March 9, 1990): 1420–3.