Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

International Journal of Nursing Studies

Volumn 67, Issue , 2017, Pages 12-19

  Marsh, Nicole ^a,b   Webster, Joan ^a,b,c   Mihala, Gabor ^b   Rickard, Claire M ^a,b  

^a ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Catheter related infections; Evidence based practice; Occlusive dressings; Peripheral venous catheters; Vascular access devices

Indexed keywords

BANDAGE; CATHETERIZATION; DEVICES; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

BANDAGES; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84997848471     PISSN: 00207489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bausone-Gazda, D., Lefaiver, C.A., Walters, S.A., A randomized controlled trial to compare the complications of 2 peripheral intravenous catheter-stabilization systems. J. Infusion Nurs. 33:6 (2010), 371–384.
2. Bolton, D., Improving peripheral cannulation practice at an NHS Trust. Br J. Nurs., 19(21), 2010, 1346 (1348-50).
3. Calvino Gunther, S., et al. Performance of new high performance dressing as compared to traditional ones in prevention infection and non-infection complications of catheters in ICU: A randomized controlled study. Intensive Care Med., 40(Suppl. 1), 2014, S240.
4. Chico-Padron, R.M., et al. Comparative safety and costs of transparent versus gauze wound dressings in intravenous catheterization. J. Nurs. Care Qual. 26:4 (2011), 371–376.
5. Deeks, J.J., Higgins, J.P.T., Altmann, D.G., Analysing data and undertaking meta-analysis. Higgins, G.S.J.P.T., (eds.) Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0, 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration.
6. Dillon, M.F., et al. Factors that affect longevity of intravenous cannulas: a prospective study. QJM 101:9 (2008), 731–735.
7. Dougherty, L., Peripheral cannulation. Nurs. Stand. 22:52 (2008), 49–56 (quiz 58).
8. Forni, C., et al. Effectiveness of the transparent sterile dressing vs standard to fix the peripheral venous catheter (PVC) on the incidence of phlebitis. A randomized controlled trial. Assist. Inferm. Ric. 31:2 (2012), 63–69.
9. Hadaway, L., Short peripheral IV catheters and infections. J. Infusion Nurs. 35:4 (2012), 230–240.
10. Harwood, I.R., et al. New peripherally inserted midline catheter: a better alternative for intravenous antibiotic therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 12 (1992), 233–239.
11. Higgins, J.P.T., Altman, D.G., Sterne, J.A.C., Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., (eds.) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0, 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration.
12. Hoffmann, K.K., et al. Bacterial colonization and phlebitis-associated risk with transparent polyurethane film for peripheral intravenous site dressings. Am. J. Infect. Control 16:3 (1988), 101–106.
13. Hoffmann, K.K., et al. Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing. A meta-analysis of the infection risks. JAMA 267:15 (1992), 2072–2076.
14. Lefebvre, C., Manheimer, E., Glanville, J., Searching for studies. Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., (eds.) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0, 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration.
15. Livesley, J., Richardson, S., Securing methods for peripheral cannulae. Nurs. Stand. 7:31 (1993), 31–34.
16. Machado, A.F., Pedreira, M.L., Chaud, M.N., Prospective, randomized and controlled trial on the dwell time of peripheral intravenous catheters in children, according to three dressing regimens. Rev. Lat. Am. Enfermagem 13:3 (2005), 291–298.
17. Machado, A.F., d. Pedreira, M.L.G., Chaud, M.N., Adverse events related to the use of peripheral intravenous catheters in children according to dressing regimens. Rev Latino-am Emfermagem 16:3 (2008), 362–367.
18. Maki, D.G., Ringer, M., Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters. Gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing. JAMA 258:17 (1987), 2396–2403.
19. Maki, D.G., Kluger, D.M., Crnich, C.J., The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different IV devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin. Proc. 81:9 (2006), 1159–1171.
20. Marsh, N., et al. Securing peripheral catheters in hospitals: can we do better at preventing catheter failure. J. Vasc. Access, 15, 2014, 204.
21. Monreal, M., et al. Infusion phlebitis in post-operative patients: when and why. Haemostasis 29:5 (1999), 247–254.
22. Rickard, C.M., et al. Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a RCT. BMC Med., 8, 2010, 53.
23. Rodriguez, L.S.M., Azcona, A.H., Majuelo, P.T., Comparsion of a transparent surgical dressing with a gauze dressing maintaining venous blood vessels [Comparacion de un aposito transparente y otro mantenimiento de vias venosas]. Revista de Enfermeria 2 (2002), 12–16.
24. Royer, T., Improving short peripheral IV outcomes: a clinical trial of two securement methods. JAVA 8:4 (2003), 45–49.
25. SIGN, Search Filters. 2011, S.I.G.N. ([cited 2014 15 February] Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html#random).
26. Schünemann, H.J., et al. Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. Higgins, Green, S., (eds.) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 J.P.T, 2011, The Cochrane Collaboration.
27. Smith, B., Peripheral intravenous catheter dwell times: a comparison of 3 securement methods for implementation of a 96-hour scheduled change protocol. J. Infus. Nurs. 29:1 (2006), 14–17.
28. Tagalakis, V., et al. The epidemiology of peripheral vein infusion thrombophlebitis: a critical review. Am. J. Med. 113:2 (2002), 146–151.
29. Tripepi-Bova, K.A., Woods, K.D., Loach, M.C., A comparison of transparent polyurethane and dry gauze dressings for peripheral IV catheter sites: rates of phlebitis, infiltration and dislodgement by patients. Am. J. Crit. Care 6:5 (1997), 377–381.
30. Webster, J., et al. Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial. Br. Med. J., 337(a339), 2008.
31. Zingg, W., Pittet, D., Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 34:4 (2009), S38–42.