Qualitative study of physicians' varied uses of biomedical research in the USA

BMJ Open

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2016, Pages

  Maggio, Lauren A ^a   Moorhead, Laura L ^b   Willinsky, John M ^c  

^a Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

MEDICAL EDUCATION TRAINING

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FRUSTRATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SCIENTIST; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PHYSICIAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PHYSICIANS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84997482131     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012846     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Audet AM, Doty MM, Shamasdin J, et al. Measure, learn, and improve: physicians' involvement in quality improvement. Health Aff 2005;24:843-53.
2. Weinberger SE. Providing high-value, cost-conscious care: a critical seventh general competency for physicians. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:386-8.
3. Bhate TD, Loh LC. Building a generation of physician advocates: the case for including mandatory training in advocacy in Canadian Medical School Curricula. Acad Med 2015;90:1602-6.
4. Amorosa JM, Mellman LA, Graham MJ. Medical students as teachers: how preclinical teaching opportunities can create an early awareness of the role of physician as teacher. Med Teach 2011;33:137-44.
5. Case D. Looking for information: a survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2007.
6. Banzi R, Cinquini M, Liberati A, et al. Speed of updating online evidence based point of care summaries: prospective cohort analysis. BMJ 2011;343:d5856.
7. Ketchum AM, Saleh AA, Jeong K. Type of evidence behind point-of-care clinical information products: a bibliometric analysis. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:e21.
8. Hoogendam A, Stalenhoef AF, Robbé PF, et al. Answers to questions posed during daily patient care are more likely to be answered by UpToDate than PubMed. J Med Internet Res 2008;10:e29.
9. Moorhead LL, Holzmeyer C, Maggio LA, et al. In an age of open access to research policies: physician and Public Health NGO Staff Research Use and Policy Awareness. PLoS ONE 2015;10: e0129708.
10. National Institutes of Health. NIH public access policy. Bethesda, MD: 2012 [cited 2016 January 16]. http://publicaccess.nih.gov/public-access-policy-implications-2012.pdf
11. Jamali HR, Nabavi M. Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields. Scientometrics 2015;105:1635-51.
12. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2015.
13. Sandelowski M. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health 2010;33:77-84.
14. Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 2006;27:237-46.
15. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2013.
16. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. The CanMEDS framework. Ottawa: 2011 [cited 2016 January 18]. http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/canmeds/framework
17. Younger P. Internet-based information-seeking behaviour amongst doctors and nurses: a short review of the literature. Health Info Libr J 2010;27:2-10.
18. Clarke MA, Belden JL, Koopman RJ, et al. Information needs and information-seeking behaviour analysis of primary care physicians and nurses: a literature review. Health Info Libr J 2013;30:178-90.
19. Maggio LA, Cate OT, Moorhead LL, et al. Characterizing physicians' information needs at the point of care. Perspect Med Educ 2014;3:332-42.
20. Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF. Teaching evidence-based medicine: should we be teaching information management instead? Acad Med 2005;80:685-9.
21. O'Keeffe J, Willinsky J, Maggio L. Public access and use of health research: an exploratory study of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Access Policy using interviews and surveys of health personnel. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:e97.
22. Tilson JK, Kaplan SL, Harris JL, et al. Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools. BMC Med Educ 2011;11:78.
23. Maggio LA, Tannery NH, Chen HC, et al. Evidence-based medicine training in undergraduate medical education: a review and critique of the literature published 2006-2011. Acad Med 2013;88:1022-8.
24. du Boulay C. Should doctors get CME points for Reading? J Clin Path 1996;49:100-1.
25. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Open Access Policy. Seattle, WA: 2015 [cited 2016 January 8]. http://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/General-Information/Open-Access-Policy
26. Research Councils UK. Research councils UK open access. London, UK: 2014 [1/18/2016]. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/openaccess/
27. Wellcome Trust. Open Access at the Welcome Trust. London, UK [1/18/2016]. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/about-us/policy/spotlight-issues/Open-access/index.html