Video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in children (excluding neonates)

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2014, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

  Abdelgadir, Ibtihal S ^a   Phillips, Robert S ^b   Moncreiff, Michael P ^c   Lumsden, Joanne L ^d  

^a YORK TEACHING HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c CALDERDALE AND HUDDERSFIELD NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; HEART RATE; HEART RHYTHM; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPY; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; OXYGEN SATURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 84997410728     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011413     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Domino KB, Posner KL, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Airway injury during anaesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 1999;91(6):1703-11. [PUBMED: 10598613]
2. Costarino AT, Downes JJ. Paediatric anaesthesia historical perspective. Anesthesioly Clinic of North America Dec 2005;23(4):573-95. [PUBMED: 16310652]
3. Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ 1997;315(7121):1533-7. [PUBMED: 9432252]
4. Fiadjoe E, Gurnaney H, Dalesio N, Sussman E, Zhao H, Zhang X, et al. A prospective randomized equivalence trial of the Glide Scope Cobalt® video laryngoscope to traditional direct laryngoscopy in neonates and infants. Anesthesiology 2012;116(3):622-8. [PUBMED: 22270505]
5. Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope-video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2012;59(1):41-52. [PUBMED: 22042705]
6. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?. BMJ 2008;336(7651):995-8.
7. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2002;327(7414):557-60.
8. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
9. Jungbauer A, Schumann M, Brunkhorst V, Börgers A, Groeben H. Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009;102(4):546-50. [PUBMED: 19233881]
10. Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, Kim DW, Kim HS, Kim CS, et al. Glidescope video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 Paediatric patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008;101(4):531-4. [PUBMED: 18689807]
11. Kim HJ, Kim JT, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim SD. A comparison of Glide-Scope-video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for naso-tracheal intubation in children. Paediatric Anaesthesia 2011;21(4):417-21. [PUBMED: 21244568]
12. Macnair D, Baraclough D, Wilson G, Bloch M, Engelhardt T. Paediatric airway management: comparing the Berci-Kaplan Video Laryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy. Paediatric Anaesthesia 2009;19(6):577-80. [PUBMED: 19645975]
13. Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: A comparison of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2006;61(7):671-7. [PUBMED: 16792613]
14. Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, MacQuarrie K, Law JA, Pytka S, et al. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anesthesiology 2003;98(1):23-7. [PUBMED: 12502974]
15. Redel A, Karademir F, Schlitterlau A, Frommer M, Scholtz LU, Kranke P, et al. Validation of the Glidescope video laryngoscope in paediatric patients. Paediatric Anaesthesia 2009;19(7):667-71. [PUBMED: 19638111]
16. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.3. Copenhagen:: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
17. Scott J, Baker PA. How did the Macintosh laryngoscope become so popular?. Paediatric Anaesthesia 2009;19 Suppl 1:24-9. [PUBMED: 19572841]
18. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology 2005;103(2):429-37. [PUBMED: 16052126]]
19. Theiler L, Hermann K, Schoettker P, Savoldelli G, Urwyler N, Kleine-Brueggeney M, et al. SWIVIT - Swiss video-intubation trial evaluating video-laryngoscopes in a simulated difficult airway scenario: study protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in Switzerland. Trials 2013;14:94. [PUBMED: 23556410]
20. Vlatten A, Aucoin S, Litz S, Macmanus B, Soder C. A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the paediatric airway -a randomized clinical trial. Paediatric Anaesthesia 2009;19(11):1102-7. [PUBMED: 19708910]
21. Vlatten A, Fielding A, Bernard A, Litz S, MacManus B, Soder C, et al. Airtraq versus direct laryngoscopy in paediatric airway. Journal of Paediatric Intensive Care 2012;2:71-6.
22. Waleed R, Moussa A, Wong D. Airtraq™ versus Macintoch laryngoscope in intubation performance in the paediatric population. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia 2012;6(4):332-5. [PUBMED: 3591549]
23. White M, Marsh I, Beringer R, Nolan J, Choi A, Medlock K, et al. A randomized, controlled trial comparing the Airtraq™ optical laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscopy in infants and children. Anaesthesia 2012;67(3):226-31. [PUBMED: 22321076]
24. Woodall N, Frerk C, Cook TM. Can we make airway management (even) safer? -lessons from national audit. Anaesthesia 2011;66(2):27-33. [PUBMED: 22074076]
25. Zhao H, Feng Y, Zhou Y. Teaching tracheal intubation: Airtraq is superior to Macintosh laryngoscope. BMC Medical Education 2014;14:144. [PUBMED: 25027257]