Structural equation modeling in educational research: A primer

Application of Structural Equation Modeling in Educational Research and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 23-51

  In'nami, Yo ^a   Koizumi, Rie ^b  

^a SHIBAURA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b JUNTENDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996802561     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-332-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (87)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1994-2012). Amos [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
2. Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2010). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 93-114). New York: Routledge.
3. Bentler, P. M. (1994-2011). EQS for Windows [Computer software]. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
4. Bentler, P. M. (2005). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
5. Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (2005). EQS 6.1 for Windows user's guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
6. Boker, S. M., Neale, M., Maes, H., Wilde, M., Spiegel, M., Brick, T., et al. (2007-2012). OpenMx [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://openmx.psyc.virginia.edu/installing-openmx.
7. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
8. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Introduction. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 1-9). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Boomsma, A., Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (2012). The structural equation modeling research report. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 341-358). New York: Guilford Press.
10. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
11. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Byrne, B. M. (2012a). Choosing structural equation modeling computer software: Snapshots of LISREL, EQS, Amos, and Mplus. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 307-324). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Byrne, B. M. (2012b). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., & Balev, J. (1998). The Beck Depression Inventory: A cross-validated test of second-order factorial structure for Bulgarian adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 241-251.
17. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
18. Chou, C., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 37-55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Cudeck, R., & du Toit, S. H. C. (2009). General structural equation models. In R. E. Millsap & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 515-539). London, UK: SAGE.
21. Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16-29.
22. Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 119-143.
23. Enders, C. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128-141.
24. Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269- 314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
25. Fox, J., Byrnes, J. E., Boker, S., & Neale, M. C. (2012). Structural equation modeling in R with the sem and OpenMx packages. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 325- 340). New York: Guilford Press.
26. Fox, J., Nie, X., Byrnes, J., Culbertson, M., Friendly, M., Kramer, A., & Monette, G. (2012). sem: Structural equation modeling. Available from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sem/index.html
27. Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., & Straub, D. (2011). An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35, A1-A7.
28. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Hancock, G. R., & Lawrence, F. R. (2006). Using latent growth models to evaluate longitudinal change. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
30. Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.). (2006). Structural equation modeling: A second course. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
31. Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1939). A study in factor analysis: The stability of a bi-factor solution [Monograph]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). (2012). Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
33. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
35. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
36. In'nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2010). Can structural equation models in second language testing and learning research be successfully replicated? International Journal of Testing, 10, 262-273.
37. In'nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2011). Structural equation modeling in language testing and learning research: A review. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 250-276.
38. In'nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2012). Factor structure of the revised TOEIC® test: A multiple-sample analysis. Language Testing, 29, 131-152.
39. Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy Jr., J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6-23.
40. Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199-218.
41. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1974-2012). LISREL for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
42. Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice: Principles, advances, and applications. The Counseling Psychology, 34, 684-718.
43. Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., Ackerman, R. A., & Russell, D. W. (2009). Reporting and interpreting research in PSPB: Practices, principles, and pragmatics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1131-1142.
45. Kieffer, M. J. (2011). Converging trajectories: Reading growth in language minority learners and their classmates, kindergarten to grade 8. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1187-1225.
46. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
47. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
48. Lomax, R. G. (2010). Structural equation modeling: Multisample covariance and mean structures. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 385-395). New York: Routledge.
49. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
50. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., Nagengast, B., & Hau, K.-T. (2012). Structural equation models of latent interaction. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 436-458). New York: Guilford Press.
51. Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1998). Longitudinal structural equation models of academic selfconcept and achievement: Gender differences in the development of math and English constructs. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 705-738.
52. Martens, M. P. (2005). The use of structural equation modeling in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 269-298.
53. McDonald, R., & Ho, M. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.
54. Mplus. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/.
55. Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2008). Best practices in structural equation modeling. In J. W. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 488-508). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. Mueller, R. O., & Hancock, G. R. (2010). Structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 371-383). New York: Routledge.
57. Mulaik, S. A. (2009). Linear causal modeling with structural equations. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
58. Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5, 159-168.
59. Muthén, B. O., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171- 189.
60. Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 431-462.
61. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
62. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599-620.
63. Narayanan, A. (2012). A review of eight software packages for structural equation modeling. The American Statistician, 66, 129-138.
64. Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical modeling (6th ed.). Richmond, VA: Virginia Institute of Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University.
65. Ockey, G. (2011). Self-consciousness and assertiveness as explanatory variables of L2 oral ability: A latent variable approach. Language Learning, 61, 968-989.
66. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Rigdon, E. (1998). SEMNET. Retrieved from http://www2.gsu.edu/~mkteer/semnet.html.
68. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: Latent variable analysis. Available from http://cran.r-project.org/ web/packages/lavaan/.
69. Royce, J. R. (1963). Factors as theoretical constructs. In D. N. Jackson & S. Messick (Eds.), Problems in human assessment. New York: McGraw Hill.
70. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
71. SAS Institute. (1990-2012). SAS PROC CALIS [Computer software]. Cary, NC: Author.
72. Satorra, A., & Saris, W. E. (1985). Power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika, 50, 83-90.
73. Schoonen, R., van Gelderen, A., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2003). First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53, 165-202.
74. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323- 337.
75. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
76. Scientific Software International. (2012). LISREL. Retrieved from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/.
77. Shin, S.-K. (2005). Did they take the same test? Examinee language proficiency and the structure of language tests. Language Testing, 22, 31-57.
78. Silverman. S. K. (2010). What is diversity?: An inquiry into preservice teacher beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 292-329.
79. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
80. Teo, T., & Khine, M. S. (Eds.). (2009). Structural equation modeling in educational research: Concepts and applications. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
81. Tong, F., Lara-Alecio, R., Irby, B., Mathes, P., & Kwok, O.-m. (2008). Accelerating early academic oral English development in transitional bilingual and structured English immersion programs. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1011-1044.
82. Ullman, J. B. (2007). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell, Using multivariate statistics (5th ed., pp. 676-780). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
83. Wang, M.-T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents' perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 633-662.
84. Widaman, K. F. (2010). Multitrait-multimethod analysis. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 299-314). New York: Routledge.
85. Williams, L., Edwards, J., & Vandenberg, R. (2003). Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research. Journal of Management, 29, 903-936.
86. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806-838.
87. Yeo, S., Fearrington, J., & Christ, T. J. (2011). An investigation of gender, income, and special education status bias on curriculum-based measurement slope in reading. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 119-130.