The impact of critical event checklists on medical management and teamwork during simulated crises in a surgical daycare facility

Anaesthesia

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 350-358

  Everett, T C ^a   Morgan, P J ^b   Brydges, R ^b   Kurrek, M ^b   Tregunno, D ^c   Cunningham, L ^b   Chan, A ^d   Forde, D ^b   Tarshis, J ^b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

cognitive aids; critical events; simulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CHECKLIST; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRISIS INTERVENTION; CRITICAL EVENT CHECKLIST; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE; OPERATING ROOM; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; SIMULATION TRAINING; SURGEON; SURGICAL DAYCARE FACILITY; SURGICAL WARD; TEAM EMERGENCY ASSESSMENT MEASURE SCORE; TEAMWORK; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EMERGENCY; ONTARIO; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RANDOMIZATION; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CHECKLIST; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EMERGENCIES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ONTARIO; OPERATING ROOMS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84996671213     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/anae.13683     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Marshall S. The use of cognitive aids during emergencies in anesthesia: a review of the literature. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2013; 117: 1162–71.
2. The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015.
3. The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Malignant Hyperthermia Crisis Safety Guideline. London: The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, 2015.
4. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New England Journal of Medicine 2009; 360: 491–9.
5. Urbach DR, Govindarajan A, Saskin R, Wilton AS, Baxter NN. Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada. New England Journal of Medicine 2014; 370: 1029–38.
6. Harrison TK, Manser T, Howard SK, Gaba DM. Use of cognitive aids in a simulated anesthetic crisis. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2006; 103: 551–6.
7. Low D, Clark N, Soar J, et al. A randomised control trial to determine if use of the iResus(c) application on a smart phone improves the performance of an advanced life support provider in a simulated medical emergency. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 255–62.
8. McEvoy MD, Hand WR, Stoll WD, Furse CM, Nietert PJ. Adherence to guidelines for the management of local anesthetic systemic toxicity is improved by an electronic decision support tool and designated “Reader”. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2014; 39: 299–305.
9. Neal JM, Hsiung RL, Mulroy MF, Halpern BB, Dragnich AD, Slee AE. ASRA checklist improves trainee performance during a simulated episode of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2012; 37: 8–15.
10. Arriaga AF, Bader AM, Wong JM, et al. Simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists. New England Journal of Medicine 2013; 368: 246–53.
11. Ziewacz EJ, Arriaga AF, Bader AM, et al. Crisis checklists for the operating room: development and pilot testing. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2011; 213: 212–7, e10.
12. Marshall SD, Mehra R. The effects of a displayed cognitive aid on non-technical skills in a simulated ‘can't intubate, can't oxygenate’ crisis. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 669–77.
13. Bould MD, Hayter MA, Campbell DM, Chandra DB, Joo HS, Naik VN. Cognitive aid for neonatal resuscitation: a prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009; 103: 570–5.
14. Burden AR, Carr ZJ, Staman GW, Littman JJ, Torjman MC. Does every code need a “reader?” improvement of rare event management with a cognitive aid “reader” during a simulated emergency: a pilot study. Simulation in Healthcare 2012; 7: 1–9.
15. Mills PD, DeRosier JM, Neily J, McKnight SD, Weeks WB, Bagian JP. A cognitive aid for cardiac arrest: you can't use it if you don't know about it. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Saftey 2004; 30: 488–96.
16. Neily J, DeRosier JM, Mills PD, Bishop MJ, Weeks WB, Bagian JP. Awareness and use of a cognitive aid for anesthesiology. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Saftey 2007; 33: 502–11.
17. Nelson KL, Shilkofski NA, Haggerty JA, Saliski M, Hunt EA. The use of cognitive AIDS during simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary arrests. Simulation in Healthcare 2008; 3: 138–45.
18. Catchpole K, Russ S. The problem with checklists. British Medical Journal Quality and Safety 2015; 24: 545–9.
19. Vila Jr, Soto R, Cantor AB, Mackey D. Comparative outcomes analysis of procedures performed in physician offices and ambulatory surgery centers. Archives of Surgery 2003; 138: 991–5.
20. Kazdin AE. Single-case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
21. Janosky J. An Overview of the Analysis of a Single-subject Design with Recommendations. Chicago, IL: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1991.
22. Engel R, Schutt R. The Practice of Research in Social Work, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2008.
23. Weiner IS, Eisen RG. Clinical research: the case study and single-subject designs. Journal of Allied Health 1985; 14: 191–201.
24. Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Academic Medicine 2014; 89: 387–92.
25. Cooper S, Cant R, Porter J, et al. Rating medical emergency teamwork performance: development of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Resuscitation 2010; 81: 446–52.
26. Cooper SJ, Cant RP. Measuring non-technical skills of medical emergency teams: an update on the validity and reliability of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure. Resuscitation 2014; 85: 31–3.
27. Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluating Training Programs. San Francisco, BK Berrett: Koehler Publishers Inc, 1998.
28. Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simulation in Healthcare 2015; 10: 106–15.
29. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment 1994; 6: 284–90.
30. Salas E, Rosen M, King H. Managing teams managing crises: principles of teamwork to improve patient safety in the emergency room and beyond. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 2007; 8: 381–94.
31. Goldhaber-Fiebert SN, Howard SK. Implementing emergency manuals: can cognitive aids help translate best practices for patient care during acute events? Anesthesia and Analgesia 2013; 117: 1149–61.
32. Joint Commission. Communication: a critical component in delivering quality care. Joint Commission: The Source 2005; 3: 1–10.
33. Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2004; 13: 330–4.
34. Russ S, Rout S, Sevdalis N, Moorthy K, Darzi A, Vincent C. Do safety checklists improve teamwork and communication in the operating room? A systematic review. Annals of Surgery 2013; 258: 856–71.
35. Marshall SD, Sanderson P, McIntosh CA, Kolawole H. The effect of two cognitive aid designs on team functioning during intra-operative anaphylaxis emergencies: a multi-centre simulation study. Anaesthesia 2016; 71: 389–404.
36. Power DJ, Boet S, Bould MD. Code Reader: a novel concept that warrants more research. Simulation in Healthcare 2012; 7: 136–7; author reply 137.