Experts’ versus laypersons’ perception of urban cultural ecosystem services

Urban Ecosystems

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 715-727

  Riechers, Maraja ^a   Noack, Eva Maria ^a   Tscharntke, Teja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bundles of services; Management of urban green; Millennium ecosystem assessment; Political conflict; Public participation; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996566952     PISSN: 10838155     EISSN: 15731642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-016-0616-3     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alberts DJ (2007) Stakeholders or subject matter experts, who should be consulted? Energ Policy. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.08.006
2. Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg (2014) http://www.statistik-berlin-brandenburg.de. Accessed 16 May 2014
3. Andersson E, McPhearson T, Kremer P, Gomez-Baggethun E, Haase D, Tuvendal M, Wurster D (2015a) Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing. Ecosyst Serv 12:157–164. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.001
4. Andersson E, Tengö M, McPhearson T, Kremer P (2015b) Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability. Ecosyst Serv. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.002
5. Backhaus K, Erichson B, Weiber R (2006) Fortgeschrittene Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Springer, Berlin
6. Beierle TC, Cayford J (2002) Democracy in practice: public participation in environmental decisions. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore
7. Bendt P, Barthel S, Colding J (2013) Civic greening and environmental learning in public-access community gardens in berlin. Landsc Urban Plan. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.003
8. Bieling C (2014) Cultural ecosystem services as revealed through short stories from residents of the Swabian Alb (Germany). Ecosystem Services. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.002
9. Bonnes M, Uzzell D, Carrus G, Kelay K (2007) Inhabitants’ and experts’ assessments of environmental quality for urban sustainability. J Soc Issues. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00496.x
10. Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J (2012) Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
11. Chrebah B (2009) Umweltbewusstsein und Umweltverhalten – Ein Vergleich von deutschen und syrischen Studierenden. Dissertation, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg. http://oops.uni-oldenburg.de/892/. Accessed 12 Dec 2014
12. Churchman A, Sadan E (2004) Public participation in environmental design and planning. In: Spielberger C (ed) Encyclopedia of applied psychology. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 793–800
13. Coeterier JF (2002) Lay people’s evaluation of historic sites. Landsc Urban Plan. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00007-5
14. Coffey A, Atkinson P (1996) Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
15. Cumming GS, Buerkert A, Hoffmann EM, Schlecht E, von Cramon-Taubadel S, Tscharntke T (2014) Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature13945
16. Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KMA, Costanza R et al (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem service agenda. P Natl Acad Sci USA. doi:10.1073/pnas.1114773109
17. Demokratische Initiative 100% Tempelhofer Feld e. V. (2014) 100% Tempelhofer Feld 2014. http://www.thf100.de. Accessed 8 Oct 2014
18. Dooling S, Simon G, Yocom K (2006) Place-based urban ecology: a century of park planning in Seattle. Urban Ecosyst. doi:10.1007/s11252-006-0008-1
19. Ernstson H (2013) The social production of ecosystem services: a framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005
20. Faehnle M, Bäcklund P, Tyrväinen L, Niemelä J, Yli-Pelkonen V (2014) How can residents’ experiences inform planning of urban green infrastructure? Case Finland. Landsc Urban Plan. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.012
21. Fischer F (2000) Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Duke, Durham
22. Flick U (2006) Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung, Rowohlt
23. Friggens M, Raish C, Finch D, McSweeney A (2014) The influence of personal belief, agency mission and city size on open space decision making processes in three southwestern cities. Urban Ecosyst. doi:10.1007/s11252-014-0419-3
24. Gee K, Burkhard B (2010) Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: a case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein. Ecol Complex. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.02.008
25. Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN (2013) Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol Econ. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
26. Gould RK, Ardoin NM, Woodside U, Satterfield T, Hannahs N, Daily GC (2014) The forest has a story: cultural ecosystem services in Kona, Hawai‘i. Ecol Soc. doi:10.5751/ES-06893-190355
27. Green O, Garmestani AS, Albro S et al (2015) Urban Ecosyst. doi:10.1007/s11252-015-0476-2
28. Guo Z, Zhang L, Li Y (2010) Increased dependence of humans on ecosystem services and biodiversity. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013113
29. Hartel T, Fischer J, Câmpeanu C, Milcu AI, Hanspach J, Fazey I (2014) The importance of ecosystem services for rural inhabitants in a changing cultural landscape in Romania. Ecol Soc. doi:10.5751/ES-06333-190242
30. Haslett JR, Berry PM, Bela G, Jongman RHG, Pataki G, Samways MJ, Zobel M (2010) Changing conservation strategies in Europe: a framework integrating ecosystem services and dynamics. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-009-9743-y
31. Herringshaw CJ, Thompson JR, Stewart TW (2010) Learning about restoration of urban ecosystems: a case study integrating public participation, stormwater management, and ecological research. Urban Ecosyst. doi:10.1007/s11252-010-0134-7
32. Hunziker M, Felber P, Gehring K, Buchecker M, Bauer N, Kienast F (2008) Evaluation of landscape change of different social groups. Results of two empirical studies in Swizerland. Mt Res Dev. doi:10.1659/mrd.0952
33. Kabisch N, Haase D (2014) Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landsc Urban Plan. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.016
34. La Rosa D, Spyra M, Inostroza L (2015). Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: a review. Ecol Indic. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.028
35. Lazo JK, Kinell JC, Fisher A (2000) Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Anal. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202019
36. López-Santiago CA, Oteros-Rozas E, Martín-López B, Plieninger T, González Martín E, González JA (2014) Using visual stimuli to explore the social perceptions of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes: the case of transhumance in Mediterranean Spain. Ecol Soc. doi:10.5751/ES-06401-190227
37. Louv R (2008) Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin, North Carolina
38. Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Del Amo DG, Gómez-Baggethun E, Oteros-Rozas E, Palacios-Agundez I, Willaarts B, González JA, Santos-Martín F, Onaindia M, López-Santiago C, Montes C (2012) Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038970
39. Mayring P (2002) Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken. Weinheim, Beltz
40. Mayring P (2008) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken, 10th edn. Weinheim, Beltz
41. MEA: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island, Washington, DC
42. Melichar J, Kaprová K (2013) Revealing preferences of Prague’s homebuyers toward greenery amenities: the empirical evidence of distance–size effect. Landsc Urban Plan. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.003
43. Milcu AI, Hanspach J, Abson D, Fischer J (2013) Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol Soc. doi:10.5751/ES-05790-180344
44. Norton LR, Inwood H, Crowe A, Baker A (2012) Trialling a method to quantify the ‘cultural services’ of the English landscape using countryside survey data. Land Use Policy. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.002
45. OECD: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001) Engaging citizens in policy-making: Information, consultation and public participations. PUMA Policy Brief 10. OECD, Paris
46. Petts J, Brooks C (2006) Expert conceptualisations of the role of lay knowledge in environmental decisionmaking: challenges for deliberative democracy. Environ Plann A. doi:10.1068/a37373
47. Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C (2013) Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013
48. Renn O, Webler T, Rakel H, Dienel P, Johnson B (1993) Public participation in decision making: a three-step procedure. Policy Sci. doi:10.1007/BF00999716
49. Riechers M, Barkmann J, Tscharntke T (2016) Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green. Ecosyst Serv. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007
50. Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt (2014a) Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de. Accessed 8 Oct 2014
51. Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt (2014b) Antwort auf die Schriftliche Anfrage Nr. 17 t13888 vom 26. Mai 2014 über Welche Kosten hat der “Masterplan Tempelhofer Freiheit” bisher verursacht? (Response to the written inquiry No. 17 t13888 from Mai 26, 2014 about Which costs has the “Masterplan Tempelhofer Freiheit” already incurred?) https://www.piratenfraktion-berlin.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/PIRATEN-Schriftliche-Anfrage-Kosten-Masterplan-THF-.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2014
52. Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt (2015a) Öffentliche Grünflächen in Berlin. Tabelle: Flächen im Berliner Stadtgebiet Stand: 31.12.2013. http://stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/umwelt/stadtgruen/gruenanlagen/de/daten_fakten/downloadd/ausw_4.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2015
53. Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt (2015b) Tempelhofer Feld https://tempelhofer-feld.berlin.de/. Accessed 11 Aug 2015
54. Tengberg A, Fredholm S, Eliasson I, Knez I, Saltzman K, Wetterberg O (2012) Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosyst Serv. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006
55. Turner KG, Odgaard MV, Bøcher PK, Dalgaard T, Svenning JC (2014) Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landsc Urban Plan. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007
56. Urban D (1986) Was ist Umweltbewußtsein? Exploration eines mehrdimensionalen Einstellungskonstruktes. Z Soziol 15:363–377 http://www.zfs-online.org/index.php/zfs/article/view/2598. Accessed 12 Dec 2014
57. Vouligny È, Domon G, Ruiz J (2009) An assessment of ordinary landscapes by an expert and by its residents: landscape values in areas of intensive agriculture use. Land Use Policy. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.016
58. Witzel A (2000) Das problemzentrierte Interview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 1(1):22