Progress, development and change

Progress in Development Studies

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-4

  Potter, Robert B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996265717     PISSN: 14649934     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/146499340100100101     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Blaikie, P. 2000: Development, post-, anti-, and populist: a critical review. Environment and Planning A 32, 1033-1055.
2. Brookfield, H. 1975: Interdependent development. London: Methuen.
3. Hanley, E. 2001: Thinking and doing things about poverty: new initiatives from the centre. Progress in Development Studies 1, 57-61.
4. Hettne, B. 2001: Discourses on peace and development. Progress in Development Studies 1, 21-36.
5. Morrissey, O. 2001: Does aid increase growth? Progress in Development Studies 1, 37-50.
6. Momsen, J. H. 2001: Backlash: or how to snatch failure from the jaws of success in gender and development. Progress in Development Studies 1, 51-56.
7. Nanderveen Pieterse, J. 2000: After post-development. Third World Quarterly 21, 175-191.
8. Payne, T. 2001: The global politics of development: towards a new research agenda. Progress in Development Studies 1, 5-19.
9. Potter, R. B., Binns, T., Elliott, J. and Smith, D. 1999: Geographies of development. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
10. Therien, J-P. and Lloyd, C. 2000: Development assistance on the brink. Third World Quarterly 21, 21-38.
11. Wheat, S. 2000: UK Development aid. The Courier, 181, 47-49
12. World Bank (1998) Assessing aid: what works, what doesn’t, andwhy. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press for theWorld Bank.