The EU Legislative Process: Academics vs. Practictioners - Round 2

European Union Politics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 353-366

  Garrett, Geoffrey ^a   Tsebelis, George ^b   Corbett, Richard ^c  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c European Parliament   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996242940     PISSN: 14651165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1465116501002003005     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Corbett, Richard (2000) ‘Academic Modelling of the Conclusion Procedure: A Practitioner's Puzzled Reaction’, European Union Politics 1: 373-381.
2. Corbett, Richard, Francis Jacobs and Michael Shackleton (1995) The European Parliament, 3rd edn. London: Longman.
3. Crombez, Christophe (1996) ‘Legislative Procedures in the European Community’, British Journal of Political Science 26: 199-228.
4. Crombez, Christophe (1997) ‘The Co-Decision Procedure in the European Union’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 22: 97-119.
5. Crombez, Christopher (2000) ‘Codecision: Towards a Bicameral European Union’, European Union Politics 1(3): 363-368.
6. Doering, Herbert (1995) ‘Time as a Scarce Resource: Government control of the agenda’, in Herbert Doering (ed.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.
7. Earnshaw, David and David Judge (1996) ‘From Co-operation to Co-decision: The European Parliament's Path to Legislative Power’, in J. J. Richardson (ed.) European Union: Power and policy-making. London: Routledge.
8. Garrett, Geoffrey and George Tsebelis (1996) ‘An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism’, International Organization 50: 269-299.
9. Golub, Jonathan (1999) ‘Decision Making Efficiency in the European Community’, International Organization 53: 733-764.
10. Hix, Simon (forthcoming) ‘Constitutional Agenda-Setting through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament won at Amsterdam’, British Journal of Political Science.
11. Huber, John D. (1996) ‘The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Political Science Review 90: 269-282.
12. Kreppel, Amie (1999) ‘What Effects the European Parliament's Legislative Influence? An Analysis of the Success of EP Amendments’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37: 521-538.
13. Kreppel, Amie (2000) ‘Rules, Ideology and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament’, European Union Politics 1: 340-362.
14. Lijphart, Arend (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15. Londregan, John (2001) Legislative Institutions and Ideology in Chile's Transition toward Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Moravcsik, Andrew and Kalypso Nicolaïdis (1999) ‘Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37: 59-85.
17. Scully, Roger M. (1997) ‘The European Parliament and the Co-Decision Procedure: A re-assessment’, Journal of Legislative Studies 3: 58-73.
18. Steunenberg, Bernard (2000) ‘Seeing What You Want to See: The Limits of Current Modelling on the European Union’, European Union Politics 1: 368-373.
19. Tsebelis, George (1994) ‘The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda-Setter’, American Political Science Review 88: 128-142.
20. Tsebelis, George (1995a) ‘Decisionmaking in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism, and Multipartyism’, British Journal of Political Science 25: 289-326.
21. Tsebelis, George (1995b) ‘Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies’ in Herbert Doering (ed.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.
22. Tsebelis, George (forthcoming) Veto Players: Foundations of Institutional Analysis.
23. Tsebelis, George and Geoffrey Garrett (1997) ‘Agenda Setting, Vetoes and the European Union's Co-decision Procedure’, Journal of Legislative Studies 3: 74-92.
24. Tsebelis, George and Geoffrey Garrett (2000) ‘Legislative Politics in the European Union’, European Union Politics 1: 9-36.
25. Tsebelis, George and Anastassios Kalandrakis (1999) ‘The European Parliament and Environmental Legislation: The Case of Chemicals’, European Journal of Political Research: 36: 119-154.
26. Tsebelis, George, Christian B. Jensen, Anastassios Kalandrakis and Amie Kreppel (1999) ‘Legislative Procedures in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis’, working paper, UCLA.
27. Tsebelis, George, Christian B. Jensen, Anastassios Kalandrakis and Amie Kreppel (forthcoming) ‘Legislative Procedures in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis’, British Journal of Political Science.