Socratic dialogue in the Swedish political context

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 1998, Issue 77, 1998, Pages 21-38

  Karlsson, Ove ^a  

^a MÄLARDALEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958055618     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1093     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Adler, M. J. Reforming Education: The Opening of the American Mind. Old Tappan, N.J.: Macmillan, 1977.
2. Bakhtin, M. M. “Epic and Novel: Toward a Methodology for the Study of the Novel.” In M. Holquist (ed.), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
3. Benhabib, S. Autonomi och gemenskap: Kommunikativ etik, feminism och postmodernism [Situating the self: Gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics]. Göteborg, Sweden: Bokförlaget Daidalos AB, 1994.
4. Bjørklund, S. Forskningsanknytning genom disputation [To connect research through disputation]. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1991.
5. Bryk, A. S.(ed.). Stakeholder-Based Evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 17. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983.
6. Buber, M. I and Thou. (W. Kaufman trans.). Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1970.
7. Buber, M. Between Man and Man. London: Fount Paperback, 1979.
8. Chelimsky, E. “What Have We Learned About the Politics of Program Evaluation?” Evaluation Practice, 1987, 8 (1), 5–21.
9. Engdahl, H. “Dialogue, and Enlightenment.” In B. Göranzon and M. Florin (eds.), Dialogue and Technology: Art and Knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
10. Franke-Wikberg, S. “The American Research on Educational Evaluation and the National Evaluation in Sweden.” In M. Granheim, M. Kogan, and U. P. Lundgren (eds.), Evaluation as Policymaking. London: Kingsley, 1990.
11. Franke-Wikberg, S. “Profilen: Sigbrit Franke-Wikberg” [The Profile: Sigbrit Franke-Wikberg]. Forskning om utbildning, 1992a, 19 (3), 45–51.
12. Franke-Wikberg, S. Utvärderingens mångfald. Några ledtrådar för vilsna utbildare [The multiplicity of evaluation. Some clues for lost educators]. Stockholm: Universitets-och Högskoleämbetet, 1992b.
13. Franke-Wikberg, S. (ed.). Skolan och utvärderingen [The school and the evaluation]. Stockholm: HLS Förlag, 1989.
14. Franke-Wikberg, S., and Lundgren, U. P. Att värdera undervisning, Del 1 [Evaluating education, Part One]. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand, 1980.
15. Furubo, J:-E., and Sandahl, R. Some Notes on Evaluation in Sweden. Newsletter of the European Evaluation Society, Jan. 1996. (c/o Riksrevisionsverket, P.O. Box 4507–0, S10430 Stockholm, Sweden.)
16. Gadamer, H.-G. Truth and Method. New York: Continuum, 1975.
17. Gallagher, S. Hermeneutics and Education. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press, 1992.
18. Gold, N. The Stakeholder Process in Educational Program Evaluation. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education, 1981.
19. Gruber, J. E. Controlling Bureaucracies: Dilemmas in Democratic Governance. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.
20. Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1989.
21. Gustavsson, B. Bildning I vår tid. Om bildningens möjligheter och villkor I det moderna samhället [Education in our time. About the possibilities and conditions for education in modern society]. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand, 1996.
22. Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.
23. House, E. R. “How We Think About Evaluation.” In E. R. House (ed.), Philosophy of Evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 19. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983.
24. House, E. R. “Internal Evaluation.” Evaluation Practice, 1986, 7 (1), 63–64.
25. House, E. R. “Evaluating the FBI: A Response to Sonnichsen.” Evaluation Practice, 1988, 9(3), 43–46.
26. House, E. R. “Methodology and Justice.” In K. A. Sirotnik (ed.), Evaluation and Social Justice: Issues in Public Education. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 45. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
27. House, E. R. “Evaluation and Social Justice: Where Are We?” In M. W. McLaughlin and D. C. Phillips (eds.), Evaluation and Education: At Quarter Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
28. House, E. R. “Putting Things Together Coherently: Logic and Justice.” In D. M. Fournier (ed.), Reasoning in Evaluation: Inferential Links and Leaps. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 68. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
29. Kapborg, I. “Evaluation of Swedish Nursing Education and Professional Practice.” Studies in Educational Sciences 4. Stockholm: HLS-Förlag, 1996.
30. Karlsson, O. Utvärdering av fritidsklubbar [Evaluation of school-age child-care/youth clubs]. Eskilstuna, Sweden: Socialtjänsten, 1990.
31. Karlsson, O. Att utvärdera-mot vad? Om kritierie problemet vid intressentutvärdering [To evaluate—to what purpose? On the problem of criteria in interest evaluation]. Studies in Educational Sciences, no. 1. Stockholm: HLS Förlag, 1995.
32. Karlsson, O. “A Critical Dialogue in Evaluation: How Can the Interaction Between Evaluation and Politics Be Tackled?” Evaluation, 1996, 2 (4), 405–416.
33. Lander, R. Utvärderingsforskning—till vilken nytta? Pedagogiska röster och två exempel från forskningsfältet skolutveckling [Evaluation research—what good is it? Educational voices and two examples from the research field of school development]. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 1987.
34. Lindensjö, B., and Lundgren, U. P. “Att skilja det goda från det dåliga” [To separate the good from the bad] In I. Palmlund (ed.), Utvärdering av offentlig verksamhet [Evaluation in the public sector]. Stockholm: Liber, 1986.
35. Lundgren, U. P. “Educational Policy-Making, Decentralisation, and Evaluation.” In M. Granheim, M. Kogan, and U. P. Lundgren (eds.), Evaluation as Policymaking. London: Kingsley, 1990.
36. Molander, B. “Socratic Dialogue: On Dialogue and Discussion in the Formation of Knowledge.” In B. Göranzon and M. Florin (eds.), Artificial Intelligence, Culture and Language: On Education and Work. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
37. Nemo, D. School-Based Evaluation: A Dialogue for School Improvement. New York: Pergamon Press, 1995.
38. Olsen, P. Svensk demokrati I förändring [The change of Swedish democracy]. Helsingborg, Sweden: Carlssons Bokförlag, 1991.
39. Palumbo, D. J. (ed.). The Politics of Program Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1987.
40. Patton, M. Q. “Politics and Evaluation.” Evaluation Practice, 1988, 9 (1), 89–99.
41. Pettersson, O. “Democracy and Power in Sweden.” Scandinavian Political Studies, 1991, 14 (2), 173–191.
42. Pettersson, S., and Wallin, E. “Utvärderingsmakt” [Power of evaluation]. In B. Rombach and K. Sahlin-Andersson (eds.), Från sanningssökande till styrmedel. Moderna utvärderingar I offentlig sektor [From a search for truth to a means of steering. Modern evaluation in the public sector]. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santérus Förlag, 1995.
43. Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.
44. Richardson, J., and Kindblad, B.-M. “Programme Evaluation and Effectiveness Auditing in Sweden: The Changing Swedish Policy Style.” Scandinavian Political Studies, 1983, 6 (1), 75–98.
45. Ricoeur, P. “The Conflict of Interpretations: Debate with Hans-Georg Gadamer.” In Mario J. Valdés (ed.), A Ricoeur Reader: Reflection and Imagination. New York: Harvester Wheat-sheaf, 1991.
46. Rombach, B., and Sahlin-Andersson, K.(eds.). Från sanningssökande till styrmedel. Moderna utvärderingar I offentlig sektor [From a search for truth to a means of steering. Modern evaluation in the public sector]. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santérus Förlag, 1995.
47. Rothstein, B. Vad bör staten göra? Om välfärdsstatens moraliska och politiska logik [What can the state do? About the moral and political logic of the welfare state]. Stockholm: SNS Förlag, 1994.
48. Salisbury, R. H. Interest Group Politics in America. New York: HarperCollins, 1970.
49. Scriven, M. Hard-Won Lessons in Program Evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 58. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
50. Scriven, M. “The Logic of Evaluation and Evaluation Practice.” In D. M. Fournier (ed.), Reasoning in Evaluation: Inferential Links and Leaps. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 68. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
51. Shadish, W. R., Jr., Cook, T. D., and Leviton, L. C. Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of Practice. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1991.
52. Sonnichsen, R. C. “An Internal Evaluator Responds to Ernest House's Views on Internal Evaluation.” Evaluation Practice, 1987, 8 (4), 34–36.
53. Sonnichsen, R. C. “Open Letter to Ernest House.” Evaluation Practice, 1989, 10 (3), 59–63.
54. Strauss, A. Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979.
55. Taylor, A. E. Sokrates [Socrates]. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur, 1939.
56. Thesleff, H. Platon [Plato]. Göteborg, Sweden: Pegas, 1990.
57. Vedung, E. “Five Observations on Evaluation in Sweden.” In J. Mayne, M. L. Bemelmans-Vides, J. Hudson, R. Conner, Advancing Public Policy Evaluation: Learning from International Experiences. New York: Elsevier Science, 1992a.
58. Vedung, E. Utvärdering I politik och förvaltning [Evaluation in politics and public administration]. Lund, Sweden: Stundentlitteratur, 1992b.
59. Vedung, E. Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 1997.
60. Wallin, E. “Some Notes on a Norwegian Evaluation Programme.” In M. Granheim, M. Kogan, and U. P. Lundgren (eds.), Evaluation as Policymaking. London: Kingsley, 1990.
61. Weinsheimer, J.-C. Gadamer's Hermeneutics: A Reading of Truth and Method. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.
62. Weinsheimer, J.-C “Gadamer's Metaphorical Hermeneutics.” In H. J. Silverman (ed.), Gadamer and Hermeneutics. New York: Routledge, 1991.
63. Weiss, C. H. “The Stakeholder Approach to Evaluation: Origins and Promise.” In A. S. Bryk (ed.), Stakeholder-Based Evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 17. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983a.
64. Weiss, C. H. “Toward the Future of Stakeholder Approaches in Evaluation.” In A. S. Bryk (ed.), Stakeholders-Based Evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 17. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983b.
65. Weiss, C. H. “Where Politics and Evaluation Research Meet.” In D. J. Palumbo (ed.), The Politics of Program Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1987.
66. Weiss, C. H. “Evaluation Research in the Political Context: Sixteen Years and Four Administrations Later.” In M. W. McLaughlin and D. C. Phillips (eds.), Evaluation and Education: At Quarter Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
67. Welch, S. D. A Feminist Ethic of Risk. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1990.
68. Wootton, G. Interest Groups: Policy and Politics in America. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1985.
69. Zetterberg, H. “Den falska bilden av svensk välfärd” [The false picture of Swedish welfare]. Dagens Nyheter, Jan. 5, 1997, p. 2.