Safety and efficacy of rocuronium with sugammadex reversal versus succinylcholine in outpatient surgery-a multicenter, randomized, safety assessor-blinded trial

American Journal of Therapeutics

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2016, Pages e1654-e1662

  Soto, Roy ^a   Jahr, Jonathan S ^b   Pavlin, Janet ^c   Sabo, Daniel ^d   Philip, Beverly K ^e   Egan, Talmage D ^f   Rowe, Everton ^g   De Bie, Joris ^g   Woo, Tiffany ^g  

^a WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^g MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Neuromuscular blockade; Outpatient; Rocuronium; Succinylcholine; Sugammadex

Indexed keywords

ANDROSTANE DERIVATIVE; GAMMA CYCLODEXTRIN DERIVATIVE; ROCURONIUM; SUGAMMADEX; SUXAMETHONIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TIME FACTOR; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ANDROSTANOLS; FEMALE; GAMMA-CYCLODEXTRINS; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SUCCINYLCHOLINE; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84995810427     PISSN: 10752765     EISSN: 15363686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000206     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Report. 2009; 11:1-25.
2. White PF, Kehlet H, Neal JM, et al. The role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery: from multimodal analgesia to perioperative medical care. Anesth Analg. 2007; 104:1380-1396.
3. Ogunnaike BO, Jones SB, Jones DB, et al. Anesthetic considerations for bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002;95: 1793-1805.
4. Bettelli G. Which muscle relaxants should be used in day surgery and when. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19:600-605.
5. Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, et al. Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2008;107: 130-137.
6. Fisher DM. Clinical pharmacology of neuromuscular blocking agents. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56:S4-S9.
7. Feinberg M. The problems of anticholinergic adverse effects in older patients. Drugs Aging. 1993;3:335-348.
8. Sabo D, Jahr J, Pavlin J, et al. The increases in potassium concentrations are greater with succinylcholine than with rocuronium-sugammadex in outpatient surgery: a randomized, multicentre trial. Can J Anaesth. 2014;61: 423-432.
9. Jonsson M, Dabrowski M, Gurley DA, et al. Activation and inhibition of human muscular and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by succinylcholine. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:724-733.
10. Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, et al. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:693-700.
11. Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, et al. Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:816-824.
12. Tang J, Joshi GP, White PF. Comparison of rocuronium and mivacurium to succinylcholine during outpatient laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg. 1996;82:994-998.
13. Geldner G, Niskanen M, Laurila P, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing sugammadex and neostigmine at different depths of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:991-998.
14. Lee C, Jahr JS, Candiotti KA, et al. Reversal of profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex administered three minutes after rocuronium: a comparison with spontaneous recovery from succinylcholine. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1020-1025.
15. Naguib M, Lien CA, Aker J, et al. Posttetanic potentiation and fade in the response to tetanic and train-of-four stimulation during succinylcholine-induced block. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1686-1691.
16. Drobnik L, Sparr HJ, Thorn SE, et al. A randomized simultaneous comparison of acceleromyography with a peripheral nerve stimulator for assessing reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:866-873.
17. Hemmerling TM, Le N. Brief review: neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:58-72.
18. Debaene B, Plaud B, Dilly MP, et al. Residual paralysis in the PACU after a single intubating dose of nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with an intermediate duration of action. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1042-1048.
19. Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, et al. Residual paralysis after emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2010; 112:1013-1022.