Are we ready to embrace connected and self-driving vehicles? A case study of Texans

Transportation

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 641-675

  Bansal, Prateek ^a   Kockelman, Kara M ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Connected and autonomous vehicles; Interval regression; Ordered probit; Public opinion survey; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMMERCE; CRASHWORTHINESS; ECONOMICS; LAND USE; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SURVEYS; TRANSPORTATION;

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; INTERVAL REGRESSION; ORDERED PROBIT; PUBLIC OPINIONS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

VEHICLES;

PUBLIC ATTITUDE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRAVEL DEMAND; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

CHICKEN ANEMIA VIRUS;

EID: 84995767401     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-016-9745-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Accenture Research. Embedded software consumer pulse survey. https://newsroom.accenture.com/content/1101/files/EmbeddedSoftwareOverall.pdf (2011). Accessed 18 Sept 2015
2. Anderson, J.M., Kalra, N., Stanley, K.D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., Olumatola, O.A.: Autonomous vehicle technology. A guide for policymakers. RAND Report. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR400/RR443-1/RAND_RR443-1.pdf (2014). Accessed 5 March 2015
3. Bansal, P., Kockelman, K.M.: Forecasting Americans’ long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies. In: Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting (No. 16-1871) and accepted for publication in Transportation Research Part A. http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/kockelman/public_html/TRB16CAVTechAdoption.pdf (2016). Accessed 4 Sept 2015
4. Bansal, P., Kockelman, K.M., Singh, A.: Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: an Austin perspective. Transp. Res. C 67, 1–14. http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/kockelman/public_html/TRB16NewTechsAustin.pdf (2016). Accessed 22 Sept 2015
5. Burns, L., Jordan, W., Scarborough, B.: Transforming Personal Mobility. The Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York. http://sustainablemobility.ei.columbia.edu/files/2012/12/Transforming-Personal-Mobility-Jan-27-20132.pdf (2013). Accessed 6 Oct 2014
6. Casley, S.V., Jardim, A.S., Quartulli, A.M.: A study of public acceptance of autonomous cars. Bachelor of Science thesis. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA. http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-043013--/unrestricted/A_Study_of_Public_Acceptance_of_Autonomous_Cars.pdf (2013). Accessed 8 March 2015
7. Cisco Systems. Cisco Customer Experience Research: Automotive Industry. Cisco Systems. https://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/ccer_report_manufacturing.pdf. (2013). Accessed 13 Sept 2015
8. Chen, T.D., Kockelman, K.M., Hanna, J.P.: Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transp. Res. A. 94, 243–254. http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/kockelman/public_html/TRB16SAEVs100mi.pdf (2016)
9. Clark, B., Parkhurst, G., Ricci, M.: Understanding the socioeconomic adoption scenarios for autonomous vehicles: a literature review. Project Report, University of the West of England, Bristol. http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/29134 (2016). Accessed 4 Aug 2016
10. Danise, A.: Women say no thanks to driverless cars, survey finds; Men say tell me more. NerdWallet: http://www.nerdwallet.com/blog/insurance/2015/06/09/survey-consumer-fears-self-driving-cars/ (2015). Accessed 21 Sept 2015
11. Fagnant, D., Kockelman, K.: Environmental implications for autonomous shared vehicles using agent-based model scenarios. Transp. Res. C 40, 1–13 (2014)
12. Fagnant, D., Kockelman, K.: Dynamic ride-sharing and optimal fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles. Transportation. http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/kockelman/public_html/TRB15SAVswithDRSinAustin.pdf (2016)
13. Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K., Bansal, P.: Operations of a shared autonomous vehicle fleet for the Austin, Texas market. Transp. Res. Rec. 2536, 98–106 (2015)
14. Greenblatt, J.B., Shaheen, S.: Automated vehicles, on-demand mobility, and environmental impacts. Curr Sustain 2(3), 74–81. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40518-015-0038-5 (2015). Accessed 2 Aug 2016
15. Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Education, Boston (2012)
16. Gulipalli, P.K., Kockelman, K.: Credit-based congestion pricing: a Dallas–Fort worth application. Transp. Policy 15(1), 23–32 (2008)
17. Haboucha, C.J., Ishaq, R., Shiftan, Y. User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles: giving up your private car. Presented at the IATBR 2015—WINDSOR. Abstract retrieved from http://www.iatbr2015.org.uk/index.php/iatbr/iatbr2015/paper/view/28 (2015). Accessed 3 Aug 2016
18. Howard, D., Dai, D.: Public perceptions of self-driving cars: the case of Berkeley, California. Presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC. https://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~djhoward/reports/Report%20-%20Public%20Perceptions%20of%20Self%20Driving%20Cars.pdf (2013). Accessed 20 Sept 2015
19. Ipsos MORI. Ipsos MORI Loyalty Automotive Survey. https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3427/Only-18-per-cent-of-Britons-believe-driverless-cars-to-be-an-important-development-for-the-car-industry-to-focus-on.aspx (2014). Accessed 12 Sept 2015
20. Kockelman, K.M., Li, T. Valuing the safety benefits of connected and automated vehicle technologies. In: Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting (No. 16-1468) (2016)
21. KPMG. Self-driving cars: are we ready? KPMG LLP. https://www.kpmg.com/US/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/self-driving-cars-are-we-ready.pdf (2013). Accessed 20 Sept 2015
22. Krueger, R., Rashidi, T.H., Rose, J.M.: Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. C 69, 343–355 (2016)
23. Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., de Winter, J.C.F.: Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transp. Res. F 32, 127–140 (2015)
24. Liu, J., Kockelman, K., Boesch, P., Francesco, C.: Tracking a system of shared autonomous vehicles across the Austin, Texas network using agent-based simulation. Under review for presentation at the 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/kockelman/public_html/TRB17SAVs_acrossAustin.pdf (2016)
25. Loeb, B., Kockelman, K., Liu, J.: Shared autonomous electric vehicle (SAEV) operations across the Austin, Texas network with a focus on charging infrastructure decisions. In: Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board and under review for publication in Transportation Research Part C, Emerging Technologies http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/kockelman/public_html/TRB17SAEVOperations.pdf (2016)
26. Long, J.S., Freese, J.: Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. Stata Press, College Station (2006)
27. NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey. U.S. Department of Transportation, Report DOT HS 811 059. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811059.PDF (2008). Accessed 15 Sept 2015
28. NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. Washington, D.C. http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/Automated_Vehicles_Policy.pdf (2013). Accessed 15 Sept 2015
29. Power, J.D.: 2015 U.S. Tech Choice Study. J.D. Power and Associates, McGraw Hill Financial. http://www.jdpower.com/sites/default/files/2015044%20Tech%20Choice%20Study%20(FINAL).pdf (2015). Accessed 21 Sept 2015
30. PUMS (Public Use Microdata Sample). United State Census Bureau: American Community Survey. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/pums_data (2013). Accessed 15 Sept 2015
31. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M.: A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK and Australia. University of Michigan, Michigan. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/108384/103024.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (2014). Accessed 4 Aug 2016
32. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M.: Motorists’ preferences for different levels of vehicle automation. University of Michigan, Technical Report No. UMTRI-2015-22. http://www.umich.edu/~umtriswt/PDF/UMTRI-2015-22_Abstract_English.pdf (2015). Accessed 20 Sept 2015
33. Sheldrick, M.: NHTSA calls for V2V technology in models built after 2020. In: Automotive Digest. http://automotivedigest.com/2014/08/nhtsa-eyes-half-million-crashes-prevented-v2v-technology/ (2014). Accessed 19 July 2015
34. Sommer, K.: Continental mobility study 2013. Continental AG http://www.continental-corporation.com/www/download/pressportal_com_en/themes/initiatives/channel_mobility_study_en/ov_mobility_study2013_en/download_channel/pres_mobility_study_en.pdf (2013). Accessed 14 Sept 2015
35. Tirumalachetty, S., Kockelman, K., Kumar S.: Micro-simulation models of urban regions: anticipating greenhouse gas emissions from transport and housing in Austin, Texas. In: Proceedings of the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/kockelman/public_html/TRB09MicrosimulationCO2.pdf (2009). Accessed 2 Aug 2016
36. Underwood, S.E.: Automated vehicles forecast vehicle symposium opinion survey. Presented at the Automated Vehicles Symposium 2014, San Francisco, CA. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8gGx-CYkV-wREVMTEhHQUxjOWM/edit (2014). Accessed 13 Sept 2015
37. Vallet, M.: Autonomous cars: will you be a co-pilot or a passenger? http://www.insurance.com/auto-insurance/claims/autonomous-cars-self-driving.html (2014). Accessed 21 Sept 2015
38. Wooldridge, J.M.: Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5th edn. South-Western, Mason (2013)