UML4IoT—A UML-based approach to exploit IoT in cyber-physical manufacturing systems

Computers in Industry

Volumn 82, Issue , 2016, Pages 259-272

  Thramboulidis, Kleanthis ^a   Christoulakis, Foivos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Cyber physical systems; Industrial Automation Thing; Industry 4.0; Internet of Things (IoT); Manufacturing systems; Mechatronics; UML profile

Indexed keywords

CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEM; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; INDUSTRY 4.0; MANUFACTURE; MECHATRONICS; SPECIFICATIONS;

DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION; INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT); MANUFACTURING ENVIRONMENTS; MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES; PRODUCTION LABORATORIES; PROTOTYPE IMPLEMENTATIONS; UML PROFILES;

INTERNET OF THINGS;

EID: 84995741402     PISSN: 01663615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2016.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. [1] Bonev, Martin, Hvam, Lars, Clarkson, John, Maier, Anja, Formal computer-aided product family architecture design for mass customization. Comput. Ind. 74 (2015), 58–70.
2. [2] Thramboulidis, K., An open distributed architecture for flexible hybrid assembly systems: a model driven engineering approach. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2015, 10.1007/s00170-015-8064-42015.
3. [3] Thramboulidis, K., Sierla, N., Koskinen, K., An IEC 61499 based approach for distributed batch process control. 5th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, July 23–27, Vienna, Austria, 2007.
4. [4] Wang, L., Törngren, M., Onori, M., Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 37:October (2) (2015), 517–527.
5. [5] Bi, Zhuming, Xu, Li Da, Wang, Chengen, Internet of things for enterprise systems of modern manufacturing. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 10(2), 2014.
6. [6] Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J., Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative industrie 4.0. Final Report of the Industry 4.0 Working Group, 2013.
7. [7] Philipp Limbourg, Dependability Modelling Under Un-certainty: An Imprecise Probabilistic Approach. 2008, Springer.
8. [8] Rzevski, G., On conceptual design of intelligent mechatronic systems. Mechatronics 13:December (10) (2003), 1029–1044.
9. [9] Thramboulidis, K., Model integrated mechatronics—towards a new paradigm in the development of manufacturing systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 1(1), 2005.
10. [10] Thramboulidis, K., The 3 + 1 SysML view-model in model integrated mechatronics. J. Software Eng. Appl. (JSEA) 3:2 (2010), 109–118.
11. [11] Macana, C.A., Quijano, N., Mojica-Nava, E., Innovative smart grid technologies (ISGT latin america). 2011 IEEE PES Conference, 19–21 October, 2011, 1–7, 10.1109/ISGT-LA.2011.6083194.
12. [12] FESTO, Industry 4.0: Efficient engineering processes with OPAK, Available on-line: https://www.festo.com/net/en_corp/SupportPortal/MobilePressDetails.aspx?documentId=368146&q=.
13. [13] Zuehlke, D., SmartFactory—towards a factory-of-Things. Annu. Rev. Control 34 (2010), 129–138.
14. [14] Girbea, A., Suciu, C., Nechifor, S., Sisak, F., Design and implementation of a service-oriented architecture for the optimization of industrial applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 10:1 (2014), 185–196, 10.1109/TII.2013.2253112.
15. [15] Cucinotta, T., Mancina, A., Anastasi, G.F., Lipari, G., Mangeruca, L., Checcozzo, R., Rusina, F., A real-time service-oriented architecture for industrial automation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 5:August (3) (2009), 267–277.
16. [16] Puttonen, J., Lobov, A., Martinez Lastra, J.L., Semantics-based composition of factory automation processes encapsulated by web services. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 9:4 (2013), 2349–2359, 10.1109/TII.2012.2220554.
17. [17] TwinCAT Beckoff [Online]. Available: http://www.beckhoff.com/english.asp?press/pr1414.htm.
18. [18] Conzon, D., Brizzi, P., Kasinathan, P., Pastrone, C., Pramudianto, F., Cultrona, P., Industrial application development exploiting IoT vision and model driven programming. Intelligence in Next Generation Networks (ICIN), 2015 18th International Conference, 2015, 168–175.
19. [19] Givehchi, Omid, Trsek, Henning, Jasperneite, Jürgen, Cloud computing for industrial automation systems—a comprehensive overview. 18th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA 2013), Cagliari, Italy, September, 2013.
20. [20] Open Mobile Alliance (OMA), Lightweight Machine to Machine Technical Specification, Candidate Version 1.0, 14 Dec 2015. Available on line: http://technical.openmobilealliance.org/Technical/technical-information/release-program/current-releases/oma-lightweightm2m-v1-0.
21. [21] Internet Protocol for Smart Objects (IPSO) Alliance, IPSO Smart Object Committee, IPSO SmartObject Guideline, 21September, 2014. Available on line: http://challenge.ipso-alliance.org/so-starter-pack.
22. [22] Thramboulidis, K., A cyber-physical system-based approach for industrial automation systems. Comput. Ind. 72 (2015), 92–102.
23. [23] Bradley, D., Russell, D., Ferguson, I., Isaacs, J., MacLeod, A., White, R., The Internet of Things—the future or the end of mechatronics. Mechatronics 27:April (2015), 57–74.
24. [24] Basile, F., Chiacchio, P., Gerbasio, D., On the implementation of industrial automation systems based on PLC. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 10:October (4) (2013), 990–1003.
25. [25] Object Management Group. OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Version 2.5, OMG Document Number formal/2015-03-01. Available On-line: http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.
26. [26] D. Guinard, V., Trifa, T., Pham, O. Liechti, Towards physical mashups in the Web of Things, International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS), 2009 Sixth, 17–19 June 2009, 1–4, Pittsburgh, PA, doi: 10.1109/INSS.2009.5409925.
27. [27] Forbes, How the Internet Of Things is transforming manufacturing. Available on line: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ptc/2014/07/01/how-the-internet-of-things-is-transforming-manufacturing/.
28. [28] Eclipse, Leshan project, Part of Eclipse IoT project. https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/leshan.
29. [29] Lee, Edward A., The past present and future of cyber-physical systems: a focus on models. Sensors 15 (2015), 4837–4869, 10.3390/s150304837.
30. [30] Herterich, Matthias M., Uebernickel, Falk, Brenner, Walter, The impact of cyber-physical systems on industrial services in manufacturing., Procedia CIRP 7th Industrial Product-Service Systems Conference—PSS, Industry Transformation for Sustainability and Business, 30, 2015, 323–328.
31. [31] Jatzkowski, Jan, Kleinjohann, Bernd, Self-reconfiguration of real-time communication in cyber-physical systems. Mechatronics, 2015 Available online, 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2015.04.014 (accessed 6.05.15).
32. [32] Jammes, F., Smit, H., Service-oriented paradigms in industrial automation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 1:1 (2005), 62–70.
33. [33] Cucinotta, T., Mancina, A., Anastasi, G.F., Lipari, G., Mangeruca, L., Checcozzo, R., Rusina, F., A real-time service-oriented architecture for industrial automation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 5:August (3) (2009), 267–277.
34. [34] Thramboulidis, K., Perdikis, D., Kantas, S., Model driven development of distributed control applications. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 33(June (3–4)), 2007.
35. [35] Elfwing, R.; Paulsson, U.; Lundberg, L., Performance of SOAP in Web Service environment compared to CORBA Software Engineering Conference (2002). Ninth Asia-Pacific.
36. [36] OASIS, Devices Profile for Web Services (DPWS). [Online] Available: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-dd/ns/dpws/2009/01.
37. [37] W3C, SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework, second ed. Available on-line: http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12/.
38. [38] Fielding, R.T., Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures. Dissertation. 2000, University of California, Irvine.
39. [39] Candido, G., Colombo, A.W., Barata, J., Jammes, F., Service-oriented infrastructure to support the deployment of evolvable production systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 7:4 (2011), 759–767, 10.1109/TII.2011.2166779.
40. [40] Jestratjew, A., Kwiecien, A., Performance of HTTP protocol in networked control systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 9:1 (2013), 271–276, 10.1109/TII.2012.2183138.
41. [41] Khaleel, H., Conzon, D., Kasinathan, P., Brizzi, P., Pastrone, C., et al. Heterogeneous applications, tools, and methodologies in the car manufacturing industry through an IoT approach. Syst. J. IEEE, 2015, 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2469681.
42. [42] Fei Tao, Ying Cheng, Li Da Xu, Lin Zhang, Bo Hu Li, CCIoT-CMfg: cloud computing and internet of things-based cloud manufacturing service system, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 10 (2) (2014) 1435–1442.
43. [43] Houyou, A.M., Huth, H.-P., Trsek, H., Kloukinas, C., Rotondi, D., Agile manufacturing: general challenges and an IoT@Work perspective, emerging technologies & factory automation (ETFA). IEEE 17th Conference, 2012, 1–7, 10.1109/ETFA.2012.6489653.
44. [44] Díaz, M., Martín, C., Rubio, B., State-of-the-art, challenges, and open issues in the integration of Internet of things and cloud computing. J. Network Comput. Appl. 67:May (2016), 99–117.
45. [45] Diaz-Cacho, Miguel, Delgado, Emma, Falcon, Pablo, Barreiro, Antonio, IoT integration on industrial environments. Factory Communication Systems (WFCS), 2015 IEEE World Conference, 2015, 1–7.
46. [46] Lee, Jay, Bagheri, Behrad, Kao, Hung-An, A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 3 (2015), 18–23.
47. [47] J. Jasperneite, Smart Factory based on intelligent technical systems, Lecture Notes in Informatic, Bonn (2015).
48. [48] Wang, L., Machine availability monitoring and machining process planning towards cloud manufacturing. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 6 (2013), 263–273.
49. [49] Internet Protocol for Smart Objects (IPSO) Alliance, IPSO Smart Object Committee, IPSO SmartObject Guideline, Smart Objects Expansion Pack, 27 October, 2015.
50. [50] Fuentes, L., Vallecillo, A., An introduction to UML profiles. UPGRADE Eur. J. Inf. Prof. 5:2 (2004), 5–13.
51. [51] Selic, B., A systematic approach to domain-specific language design using UML ISORC’07. 10th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, 2007.
52. [52] Boutekkouk, M., Benmohammed, S., UML2.0 profiles for embedded systems and systems on a chip (SOCs). J. Object Technol., 8(January–February (1)), 2009.
53. [53] Demathieu, S., Thomas, F., André, C., Gérard, S., Terrier, F., First experiments using the UML profile for MARTE. 11th IEEE Symposium on Object Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), 2011.
54. [54] Gherbi, A., Khendek, F., UML profiles for real-time systems and their applications. J. Object Technol., 5(May–June (4)), 2006.
55. [55] Cadavid, J., Alférez, M., Gérard, S., Tessier, P., Conceiving the model-driven smart factory. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process, ICSSP, 2015, 72–76.
56. [56] Mernik, M., Heering, J., Sloane, A.M., When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 37:December (4) (2005), 316–344.
57. [57] Albreshne, A., Pasquier, J., A domain specific language for high-Level process control programming in smart buildings., Procedia Comput. Sci. The 6th International Conference on Emerging Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks, (EUSPN 2015), 63, 2015, 65–73.
58. [58] Kosar, T., Bohra, S., Mernik, M., Domain-specific languages: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Software Technol. 71 (2016), 77–91.
59. [59] Eterovic, T., Kaljic, E., Donko, D., Salihbegovic, A., Ribic, S., An Internet of Things visual domain specific modeling language based on UML. Information, Communication and Automation Technologies (ICAT), 2015 XXV International Conference, 2015, 1–5, 10.1109/ICAT.2015.7340537.
60. [60] Prehofer, C., Models at REST or modelling RESTful interfaces for the Internet of Things. Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum, 2015, 251–255, 10.1109/WF-IoT.2015.7389061.
61. [61] Poole, J.D., Model-driven architecture: vision, standards and emerging technologies. Workshop on Metamodeling and Adaptive Object Models (ECOOP 2001), 2001.
62. [62] J. Bézivin, In search of a basic principle for model driven engineering. Special Novática Issue UML and Model Engineering, V(2) (2004).
63. [63] Thang, X., Huu, N., Tran, T., Baraki, H., Geihs, K., FRASAD: a framework for model-driven IoT application development. Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum, 2015, 387–392, 10.1109/WF-IoT.2015.7389085.
64. [64] Marand, E.A., Marand, E.A., Challenger, M., DSML4CP: a domain-specific modeling language for concurrent programming. Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct. 44 (2015), 319–341.
65. [65] Sobernig, S., Hoisl, B., Strembeck, M., Extracting reusable design decisions for UML-based domain-specific languages: a multi-method study. J. Syst. Software 113 (2016), 140–172.
66. [66] Prehofer, C., Chiarabini, L., From internet of things mashups to model-based development. 2015 IEEE 39th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), 1–5 July, 2015, 499–504.
67. [67] García, C.G., Cristina Pelayo G-Bustelo, B., Pascual Espada, J., Cueva-Fernandez, G., Midgar: generation of heterogeneous objects interconnecting applications. A domain specific language proposal for Internet of Things scenarios. Comput. Networks 64 (2014), 143–158.
68. [68] G. Klas, F. Rodermund, Z. Shelby, S. Akhouri, J. Höller, Lightweight M2M: enabling device management and applications for the Internet of Things, Febuary 2014. Available on line: http://archive.ericsson.net/service/internet/picov/get?DocNo=1/28701-FGB101973.
69. [69] Z. Shelby, K. Hartke, C. Bormann, The constrained application protocol (CoAP) IETF request for comments: 7252. Available on-line: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7252.
70. [70] IoT Eclipse org, LwM2M Over MQTT. Available online: http://openiotchallenge.tumblr.com/post/110888019710/lwm2m-over-mqtt.