Framework for enhancing clinical practice guidelines through continuous patient engagement

Health Expectations

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 3-10

  Armstrong, Melissa J ^a,b   Rueda, Juan David ^c   Gronseth, Gary S ^d   Mullins, C Daniel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF PHARMACY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

decision making; guideline adherence; guidelines as topic; patient participation; patient centred care

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

EID: 84995695191     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12467     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2010; 182: E839–E842.
2. Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2006; 5: 22.
3. Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F et al. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2012; 156: 525–531.
4. Jarrett L, Patient Involvement Unit. A report on a study to evaluate patient/carer membership of the first NICE Guideline Development Groups. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2004.
5. Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworhty Clinical Practice Guidelines. Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM et al., eds. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine, The National Academies Press, 2011.
6. G-I-N PUBLIC Toolkit: Patient and Public Involvement in Guidelines. 2015. Available at: http://www.g-i-n.net/working-groups/gin-public/toolkit. accessed 26 January 2016.
7. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Strategy for patient-oriented research – patient engagement framework, 2014. Available at: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html. accessed 26 January 2016.
8. Légaré F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Medical Decision Making, 2011; 31: E45–E74.
9. Tong A, Lopez-Vargas P, Howell M et al. Consumer involvement in topic and outcome selection in the development of clinical practice guidelines. Health Expectations, 2011; 15: 410–423.
10. Mullins CD, Abdulhalim AM, Lavallee DC. Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 2012; 307: 1587–1588.
11. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011; 64: 395–400.
12. van de Bovenkamp HM, Trappenburg MJ. Reconsidering patient participation in guideline development. Health Care Analysis, 2009; 17: 198–216.
13. van Wersch A, Eccles M. Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme. Quality in Health Care, 2001; 10: 10–16.
14. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2010; 19: e22.