Road map for improvement: Point prevalence audit and survey of central venous access devices in paediatric acute care

Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 123-130

  Ullman, Amanda J ^a,b   Cooke, Marie ^a,b   Kleidon, Tricia ^b,c   Rickard, Claire M ^a,b  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c LADY CILENTO CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

audit; central venous catheter; evidence based care; paediatrics; quality care; survey

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; BLOODSTREAM INFECTION; CATHETER BLOCKAGE; CATHETER DISLODGEMENT; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CHILD; CHILD CARE; CLINICAL AUDIT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMERGENCY CARE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXTRAVASATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INJECTION SITE CONTUSION; INJECTION SITE ERYTHEMA; INJECTION SITE INFECTION; INJECTION SITE PAIN; INJECTION SITE REACTION; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANAGER; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PATIENT CARE; PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL; PEDIATRICS; PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; PHYSICIAN; POINT PREVALENCE AUDIT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PREVALENCE; RASH; SCHOOL CHILD; SCIENTIST; SKIN INJURY; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; THROMBOSIS; WOUND DRESSING; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AUSTRALIA; CATHETERIZATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HOSPITAL; INTENSIVE CARE; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

AUSTRALIA; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS; CRITICAL CARE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HOSPITALS, PEDIATRIC; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; PREVALENCE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

EID: 84995632395     PISSN: 10344810     EISSN: 14401754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.13347     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ullman AJ, Marsh N, Mihala G, Cooke M, Rickard CM. Complications of central venous access devices: A systematic review. Pediatrics 2015; 136: e1331–44.
2. World Health Organization. Preventing Bloodstream Infections from Central Line Venous Catheters. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2012. Available from http://www.who.int/patientsafety/implementation/bsi/en/index.html [accessed 11 September 2013].
3. Peng C, Monagle P, Newall F. Clinical outcomes of management of CVAD occlusions. Arch. Dis. Child. 2011; 96: 885–7.
4. van Miert C, Hill R, Jones L. Interventions for restoring patency of occluded central venous catheter lumens. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012; 4: CD007119.
5. Ullman AJ, Long DA, Rickard CM. Prevention of central venous catheter infections: A survey of paediatric ICU nurses’ knowledge and practice. Nurse Educ. Today 2014; 34: 202–7.
6. Miller MR, Niedner MF, Huskins WC et al. Reducing PICU central line-associated bloodstream infections: 3-Year results. Pediatrics 2011; 128: e1077–83.
7. Ullman AJ, Cooke ML, Mitchell M et al. Dressings and securement devices for central venous catheters (CVC). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015; 9: CD010367.
8. Safdar N, O'Horo JC, Ghufran A et al. Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection: A meta-analysis. Crit. Care Med. 2014; 42: 1703–13.
9. Loveday HP, Wilson JA, Pratt RJ et al. epic3: National evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections. J. Hosp. Infect. 2014; 86: S1–70.
10. Infusion Nurses Society. Infusion therapy standards of practice. J. Infus. Nurs. 2016; 39: S1–160.
11. Marschall J, Mermel LA, Fakih M et al. Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2014; 35: S89–107.
12. Ullman AJ, Cooke ML, Gillies D et al. Optimal timing for intravascular administration set replacement. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013; 9: CD003588.
13. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011; 52: e162–93.
14. Harron K, Ramachandra G, Mok Q, Gilbert R, CATCH Team. Consistency between guidelines and reported practice for reducing the risk of catheter-related infection in British paediatric intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2011; 37: 1641–7.
15. Rickard CM, Courtney M, Webster J. Central venous catheters: A survey of ICU practices. J. Adv. Nurs. 2004; 48: 247–56.
16. Broadhurst D, Moureau N, Ullman AJ. Central venous access devices site care practices: An international survey of 34 countries. J. Vasc. Access 2016; 17: 78–86.
17. Russell E, Chan RJ, Marsh N, New K. A point prevalence study of cancer nursing practices for managing intravascular devices in an Australian tertiary cancer center. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2013; 18: 231–5.
18. Goddard L, Clayton S, Peto TE, Bowler IC. The ‘just-in-case venflon’: Effect of surveillance and feedback on prevalence of peripherally inserted intravascular devices. J. Hosp. Infect. 2006; 64: 401–2.
19. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S et al. Audit and feedback: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012; 6: CD000259.
20. New KA, Webster J, Marsh NM, Hewer B. Intravascular device use, management, documentation and complications: A point prevalence survey. Aust. Health Rev. 2014; 38: 345–9.
21. Alexandrou E. The one million global catheters PIVC worldwide prevalence study. Br. J. Nurs. 2014; 23: S16–7.
22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Healthcare Safety Network Device Associated Module: CLABSI. Atlanta: Government USoA, 2014.
23. Fratino G, Molinari AC, Parodi S et al. Central venous catheter-related complications in children with oncological/hematological diseases: An observational study of 418 devices. Ann. Oncol. 2005; 16: 648–54.
24. Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J. Clin. Nurs. 2007; 16: 234–43.
25. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs. Res. 1986; 35: 382–5.
26. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res. Nurs. Health 2007; 30: 459–67.
27. Hallgren KA. Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 2012; 8: 23–34.
28. Griffiths P, Murrells T. Reliability assessment and approaches to determining agreement between measurements: Classic methods paper. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2010; 47: 937–8.
29. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–74.
30. Bannigan K, Watson R. Reliability and validity in a nutshell. J. Clin. Nurs. 2009; 18: 3237–43.
31. Wall JB, Divito SJ, Talbot SG. Chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated central-line dressings and necrosis in complicated skin disorder patients. J. Crit. Care 2014; 29: 1130.e1–4.
32. Bradford NK, Edwards RM, Chan RJ. Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride intermittent flushing for the prevention of occlusion in long term central venous catheters in infants and children. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015; 11: CD010996.
33. Lopez-Briz E, Ruiz Garcia V, Cabello JB, Bort-Marti S, Carbonell Sanchis R, Burls A. Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride intermittent flushing for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014; 10: CD008462.
34. Zhang L, Keogh S, Rickard CM. Reducing the risk of infection associated with vascular access devices through nanotechnology: A perspective. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2013; 8: 4453–66.
35. Keogh S, Flynn J, Marsh N, Higgins N, Davies K, Rickard CM. Nursing and midwifery practice for maintenance of vascular access device patency. A cross-sectional survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2015; 52: 1678–85.