Women's perceptions of informed choice in maternity care

Midwifery

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 136-144

  O'Cathain, Alicia ^a   Thomas, Kate ^a   Walters, Stephen J ^a   Nicholl, Jon ^a   Kirkham, Mavis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN SYNDROME; FEMALE; FETUS MONITORING; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MANUAL LABOR; MATERNAL CARE; MATERNITY WARD; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL SERVICE; MULTIPARA; PRENATAL PERIOD; PRENATAL SCREENING; SCREENING TEST; SPINA BIFIDA; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; MOTHER; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; MOTHERS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; WALES;

EID: 84995355522     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/midw.2002.0301     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Anderson T, Rosser J 1998 Informed choice. Was it the wrong choice? Editorial. The Practising Midwife 1: 4-5
2. Audit Commission 1998 First class delivery: a national survey of women's views of maternity care. Audit Commission, London
3. Charles C, Redko C, Whelan T et al. 1998 Doing nothing is no choice: lay constructions of treatment decision-making among women with early-stage breast cancer. Sociology of Health and Illness 20: 71-95
4. Churchill H, Benbow A 2000 Informed choice in maternity services. British Journal of Midwifery 8: 41-47
5. Degner LF, Sloan JA 1992 Decision making during serious illness; what role do patients really want to play? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 45: 9 41-950
6. Department of Health 1993 Changing Childbirth. Report of the Expert Maternity Group. HMSO, London
7. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Smith C et al. 2001 Consumers' views of quality in the consultation and their relevance to 'shared decision-making' approaches. Health Expectations 4: 151-161
8. Entwistle VA, Sheldon TA, Sowden A et al. 1998 Evidence-informed patient choice. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 14: 212-225
9. Entwistle VA, Skea ZC, O'Donnell MT 2001 Decisions about treatment: interpretations of two measures of control by women having a hysterectomy. Social Science and Medicine 53: 721-732
10. Kendall L 2001 The future patient. Institute for Public Policy Research, London
11. Kirkham M, Stapleton H 2001 Informed choice in maternity care: an evaluation of evidence based leaflets. Report 20, The University of York, York
12. Lavender T, Walkinshaw SA, Wallon I 1999 A prospective study of women's views of factors contributing to a positive birth experience. Midwifery 15: 40-46
13. Levy V 1999 Maintaining equilibrium: a grounded theory study of the processes involved when women make informed choices during pregnancy. Midwifery 15: 109-119
14. Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S 2001 A measure of informed choice. Health Expectations 4: 99-108
15. McKinstry B 2000 Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes. British Medical Journal 321: 867-871
16. Oliver S, Rajan L, Turner H et al. 1996 Informed choice for users of health services: views on ultrasonography leaflets of women in early pregnancy, midwives, and ultrasonographers. British Medical Journal 313: 1251-1255
17. Wyke S, Hewison J, Elton R et al. 2001 Does general practitioner involvement in commissioning maternity care make a difference? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 6: 99-104