Multiparametric sensitivity analysis of the additive model in data envelopment analysis

International Transactions in Operational Research

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 365-380

  Singh, Sanjeet ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT CALCUTTA   (India)

Author keywords

Additive model; Data envelopment analysis; Linear programming; Maximum volume region; Parametric analysis; Sensitivity analysis; Tolerance approach

Indexed keywords

EID: 84995315321     PISSN: 09696016     EISSN: 14753995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2009.00735.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ahn, T.S., Seiford, L.M., 1993. Sensitivity of DEA to models and variable sets in a hypothesis test setting: The efficiency operations. In Yuji, I. (ed.) Creative and Innovative Approaches to the Science of Management. Quorum Books, New York, pp. 191–208.
2. Andersen, P., Petersen, N.C., 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39, 1261–1264.
3. Banker, R.D., Kemerer, C.F., 1989. Scale economies in new software development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 15, 1199–1205.
4. Barr, R.S., Siems, T.F., 1997. Bank failure prediction using DEA to measure management quality. In Barr, R.S., Helgason, R.V., Kennington, J.L. (eds) Advances in Metaheuristics, Optimization, and Stochastic Modeling Techniques. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 341–365.
5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Golany, B., Seiford, L.M., Stutz, J., 1985. Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics 30, 91–107.
6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444.
7. Charnes, A., Haag, S., Jaska, P., Semple, J.H., 1992. Sensitivity of efficiency classification in the additive model of data envelopment analysis. International Journal of System Science 23, 5, 789–798.
8. Charnes, A., Neralić, L., 1989a. Sensitivity analysis in data envelopment analysis 2. Glasnik Matematicǩi Series III 24, 44, 449–463.
9. Charnes, A., Neralić, L., 1989b. Sensitivity analysis in data envelopment analysis 1. Glasnik Matematicǩi Series III 24, 44, 211–226.
10. Charnes, A., Neralić, L., 1990. Sensitivity analysis of the additive model in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 48, 332–341.
11. Charnes, A., Neralić, L., 1992a. Sensitivity analysis for the case of proportionate change of inputs (or outputs) in data envelopment analysis. Glasnik Matematicǩi Series III 27, 47, 393–405.
12. Charnes, A., Neralić, L., 1992b. Sensitivity analysis in data envelopment analysis 3. Glasnik Matematicǩi Series III 27, 47, 191–201.
13. Charnes, A., Neralić, L., 1995. Sensitivity analysis in data envelopment analysis for the case of non-discretionary inputs and outputs. Glasnik Matematicǩi Series III 30, 50, 359–371.
14. Charnes, A., Rousseau, J.J., Semple, J.H., 1996. Sensitivity and stability of efficiency classification in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 7, 5–18.
15. Charnes, A., Zlobec, S., 1989. Stability of efficiency evaluations in data envelopment analysis. Zeitschrift für Operations Research 33, 167–179.
16. Cook, W.D., Roll, Y., Kazakov, A., 1990. A DEA model for measuring the relative efficiency of highway maintenance patrols. INFOR 28, 2, 113–124.
17. Cook, W.D., Seiford, L.M., 2009. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) – Thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research 192, 1–17.
18. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Tone, K., 2007. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text With Models, Applications, References, and DEA-Solver Software. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
19. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Logan, J., Lovell, C.A.K., 1985. Measuring efficiency in production: with an application to electric utilities. In Färe, R.S., Grosskopf, G., Lovell, C.A.K. (eds) The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 185–214.
20. Farrell, M.J., 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120, 3, 253–290.
21. Gal, T., Greenberg, H.J., 1997. Advances in Sensitivity Analysis and Parametric Programming. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, MA.
22. Gattoufi, S., Oral, M., Kumar, A., Reisman, A., 2004a. Epistemology of data envelopment analysis and comparison with other fields of OR/MS for relevance to applications. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 38, 123–140.
23. Gattoufi, S., Oral, M., Reisman, A., 2004b. A taxonomy for data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 38, 141–158.
24. Gonzalez-Lima, M.D., Tapia, R.A., Thrall, R.M., 1996. On the construction of strong complementarity slackness solutions for DEA linear programming problems using a primal-dual interior-point method. Annals of Operations Research 66, 139–162.
25. Liebman, J., Ladson, L., Scharge, L., Waren, A., 1986. Modeling and Optimization with GINO. The Scientific Press, San Francisco, CA.
26. Neralić, L., 1992. Sensitivity analysis of the proportionate change of outputs or/and inputs of the additive model in data envelopment analysis. In Bahovec, V., Martić, LJ., Neralić, L. (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Operational Research KOI '92, Rovinj. CORS, Croatia, pp. 71–80.
27. Neralić, L., 1997. Sensitivity in data envelopment analysis for arbitrary perturbations of data. Glasnik Mathematicǩi Series III 32, 52, 315–335.
28. Ray, S., Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J., 1998. Market entity behaviour of Chinese state-owned enterprises. OMEGA 26, 2, 263–278.
29. Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J., 1999. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science 45, 9, 1270–1288.
30. Sherman, H.D., 1984. Improving the productivity of service businesses. Sloan Management Review 35, 3, 11–23.
31. Singh, S., Gupta, P., Bhatia, D., 2005. Multiparametric sensitivity analysis in programming problems with linear-plus-linear fractional objective function. European Journal of Operational Research 160, 232–241.
32. Smith, P., 1997. Model misspecification in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research 73, 233–252.
33. Thompson, R., Dharmapala, P.S., Thrall, R.M., 1994. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency measures with application to Kansas farming and Illinois coal mining. In Charnes, A., et al. (eds) Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 393–423.
34. Thompson, R.G., Dharmapala, D.J., Gonzalez-Lima, M.D., Thrall, R.M., 1996. DEA multiplier analytic center sensitivity with an illustrative application to independent oil companies. Annals of Operations Research 66, 163–177.
35. Wang, H.F., Huang, C.S., 1992. The maximal tolerance analysis on the constraint matrix in linear programming. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 15, 5, 507–517.
36. Wang, H.F., Huang, C.S., 1993. Multi-parametric analysis of the maximum tolerance in a linear programming problem. European Journal of Operational Research 67, 75–87.
37. Wilkens, K., Zhu, J., 2001. Portfolio evaluation and benchmark selection: A mathematical programming approach. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 11, 319–323.
38. Zhu, J., 1996a. DEA/AR analysis of the 1988–1989 performance of the Nanjing Textile Corporation. Annals of Operations Research 66, 311–335.
39. Zhu, J., 1996b. Robustness of efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 90, 451–460.