Erratum: Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (The Lancet (2016) 388(10052) (1408–1416) (S0140673616313411)(10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31341-1));Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

The Lancet

Volumn 388, Issue 10052, 2016, Pages 1408-1416

  Clark, William ^f   Bird, Paul ^a   Gonski, Peter ^a,b   Diamond, Terrence H ^a,c   Smerdely, Peter ^a,c   McNeil, H Patrick ^d   Schlaphoff, Glen ^a,e   Bryant, Carl ^f   Barnes, Elizabeth ^g   Gebski, Val ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b SUTHERLAND HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c ST GEORGE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e LIVERPOOL HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^f St George Private Hospital   (Australia)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; CORTICOSTEROID; OPIATE; SEDATIVE AGENT;

AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; HUMERAL SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURE; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NUMERIC RATING SCALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARAPLEGIA; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; PLASTER CAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; RESPIRATORY ARREST; RESUSCITATION; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; SPINE FRACTURE; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURE; VERTEBRA COMPRESSION; VERTEBRAL FILL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; COMPRESSION FRACTURE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FRACTURES, COMPRESSION; HUMANS; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBROPLASTY;

EID: 84994810754     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31468-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (30)

1. 1 Johnell, O, Kanis, JA, An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17 (2006), 1726–1733.
2. 2 Jacobsen, SJ, Cooper, C, Gottlieb, MS, Goldberg, J, Yahnke, DP, Melton, LJ, Hospitalization with vertebral fracture among the aged: a national population-based study, 1986–1989. Epidemiology 3 (1992), 515–518.
3. 3 Goldstein, CL, Chutkan, NB, Choma, TJ, Orr, RD, Management of the elderly with vertebral compression fractures. Neurosurgery 77:suppl 4 (2015), S33–S45.
4. 4 Kallmes, DF, Comstock, BA, Heagerty, PJ, et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 361 (2009), 569–579.
5. 5 Buchbinder, R, Osborne, RH, Ebeling, PR, et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 361 (2009), 557–568.
6. 6 Boszczyk, B, Volume matters: a review of procedural details of two controlled vertebroplasty trials of 2009. Eur Spine J 19 (2010), 1837–1840.
7. 7 Klazen, CA, Lohle, PN, de Vries, J, et al. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet 376 (2010), 1085–1092.
8. 8 Rousing, R, Andersen, MO, Jespersen, SM, Thomsen, K, Lauritsen, J, Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared to conservative treatment in patients with painful acute or subacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: three-months follow-up in a clinical randomized study. Spine 34 (2009), 1349–1354.
9. 9 Rousing, R, Hansen, KL, Andersen, MO, Jespersen, SM, Thomsen, K, Lauritsen, JM, Twelve-months follow-up in forty-nine patients with acute/semiacute osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated conservatively or with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a clinical randomized study. Spine 35 (2010), 478–482.
10. 10 Staples, MP, Kallmes, DF, Comstock, BA, et al. Effectiveness of vertebroplasty using individual patient data from two randomised placebo controlled trials: meta-analysis. BMJ, 343, 2011, d3952.
11. 11 Clark, WA, Bird, P, Diamond, TH, Gonski, PN, Vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 16, 2015, 159.
12. 12 Roland, M, Fairbank, J, The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 25 (2000), 3115–3124.
13. 13 Lips, P, Cooper, C, Agnusdei, D, et al. Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 10 (1999), 150–160.
14. 14 Rabin, R, de Charro, F, EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med 33 (2001), 337–343.
15. 15 Podsiadlo, D, Richardson, S, The timed “Up and Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39 (1991), 142–148.
16. 16 Genant, HK, Wu, CY, van Kujik, C, Nevitt, MC, Vertebral fracture assessment using a semi-quantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8 (1993), 1137–1148.
17. 17 Han, SL, Wan, SL, Li, QT, et al. Is vertebroplasty a risk factor for subsequent vertebral fracture, meta-analysis of published evidence?. Osteoporos Int 26 (2015), 113–122.
18. 18 Liu, JT, Liao, WJ, Tan, WC, et al. Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study. Osteoporos Int 21 (2010), 359–364.
19. 19 Klazen, CAH, Venmans, A, de Vries, J, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is not a risk factor for new osteoporotic compression fractures–results from VERTOS II. Am J Neuroradiol 31 (2010), 1447–1450.
20. 20 McKiernan, F, Jensen, R, Faciszewski, T, The dynamic mobility of vertebral compression fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18 (2003), 24–29.
21. 21 McKiernan, F, Faciszewski, T, Intravertebral clefts in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Arthritis Rheum 48 (2003), 1414–1419.
22. 22 Wilson, DJ, Owen, S, Corkill, RA, Facet joint injections as a means of reducing the need for vertebroplasty in insufficiency fractures of the spine. Eur Radiol 21 (2011), 1772–1778.
23. 23 Kroon, F, Staples, M, Ebeling, PR, et al. Two-year results of a randomized placebo-controlled trial of vertebroplasty for acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 29 (2014), 1346–1355.
24. 24 Doidge, J, Merlin, T, Liufu, Z, Tamblyn, D, Jia, LY, Hiller, JE, Review of interim funded service: vertebroplasty and new review of Kyphoplasty. MSAC Application 27.1, 2011, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, ACT http://www.msac.gov.au/internet/msac/publishing.nsf/Content/27.1-public (accessed June 15, 2016).
25. 25 Buchbinder, R, Golmohammadi, K, Johnston, RV, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4, 2015 CD006349.
26. 26 Wardlaw, D, Cummings, SR, Van Meirhaeghe, J, et al. Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373 (2009), 1016–1024.
27. 27 Evans, AJ, Kip, KE, Brinjikji, W, et al. Randomized controlled trial of vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. J NeuroIntervent Surg, 2015, 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011811 published online June 24.
28. 28 Dohm, M, Black, CM, Dacre, A, Tillman, JB, Fueredi, G, A randomized trial comparing balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis. Am J Neuroradiol 35 (2014), 2227–2236.
29. 29 Gu, CN, Brinjikji, W, Evans, AJ, Murad, MH, Kallmes, DF, Outcomes of vertebroplasty compared with kyphoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 8 (2016), 636–642.
30. 30 Boutron, I, Moher, D, Altman, DG, Schulz, KF, Ravaud, P, Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 148 (2008), 295–309.