Return to work stakeholders' perspectives on work disability

Handbook of Work Disability: Prevention and Management

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 409-423

  Young, Amanda E ^a  

^a LIBERTY MUTUAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SAFETY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994661134     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6214-9_25     Document Type: Chapter

References (93)

1. Amick, B. C., III, et al. (2000). Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10, 21-38.
2. Amir, Z., et al. (2010). Return to work after cancer in the UK: Attitudes and experiences of line managers. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20 (4), 435-442.
3. Anema, J. R., et al. (2002). Ineffective disability management by doctors is an obstacle for return-to-work: A cohort study on low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59 (11), 729-733.
4. Bickenbach, J. (2001). Disability human rights, law and policy. In G. Albrecht, K. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 565-584). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Black, C. (2008). Working for a healthier tomorrow: Dame Carol Black's review of the health of Britain's working age population. Norwich: The Stationery Office.
6. Bloch, F., & Prins, R. (Eds.). (2001). Who returns to work and why?: A six country study of work incapacity and reintegration. International Social Security Series. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
7. Briand, C., et al. (2008). How well do return-to-work interventions for musculoskeletal conditions address the multicausality of work disability? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18 (2), 207-217.
8. Briggs, A. M., & Buchbinder, R. (2009). Back pain: A national health priority area in Australia? The Medical Journal of Australia, 190 (9), 499-502.
9. Brooker, A. S., et al. (2000). Effective disability management and return-to-work practices: What we can learn from low back pain. Toronto: Institute for Work and Health.
10. Bruckman, R. Z., & Harris, J. S. (1998). Occupational medicine practice guidelines. Occupational Medicine, 13 (4), 679-691.
11. Buchbinder, R. (2008). Self-management education en masse: Effectiveness of the back pain: Don't take it lying down mass media campaign. The Medical Journal of Australia, 189 (10 Suppl), S29-S32.
12. Buchbinder, R., & Jolley, D. (2004). Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs: Three year follow up population survey. British Medical Journal, 328 (7435), 321.
13. Burton, J. (2004). A primer on workers' compensation. Workers' Compensation Policy Review, 4, 2-16.
14. Burton, W. N., et al. (1999). The role of health risk factors and disease on worker productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 41 (10), 863-877.
15. Cater, B. (2000). Employment, wage, and accommodation patterns of permanently injured workers. Journal of Labor Economics, 18, 74-97.
16. Cifu, D. X., et al. (1999). Age, outcome, and rehabilitation costs after tetraplegia spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 12, 177-185.
17. Cott, C. A. (2004). Client-centred rehabilitation: Client perspectives. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26 (24), 1411-1422.
18. Dekkers-Sanchez, P. M., et al. (2011). What promotes sustained return to work of employees on long-term sick leave? Perspectives of vocational rehabilitation professionals. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 37 (6), 481-493.
19. Department of Work and Pensions. (2002). Pathways to work: Helping people into employment. London: Department of Work and Pensions.
20. Deyo, R. A., & Diehl, A. K. (1986). Patient satisfaction with medical care for low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 11 (1), 28-30.
21. Drake, R. (2001). Welfare states and disabled people. In G. Albrecht, K. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 412-429). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Drake, R. E., et al. (2004). Three-year outcomes of longterm patients with co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorders. Biological Psychiatry, 56 (10), 749-756.
23. Eijkemans, G. J., & Takala, J. (2005). Moving knowledge of global burden into preventive action. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 48 (6), 395-399.
24. Fisher, T. (2003). Perception differences between groups of employees identifying the factors that influence a return to work after a work-related musculoskeletal injury. Work, 21, 211-220.
25. Franche, R. L., & Krause, N. (2002). Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: Conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 12 (4), 233-256.
26. Franche, R. L., et al. (2005). Workplace-based return-towork interventions: Optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15 (4), 525-542.
27. Frank, J., et al. (1996). Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part II: What do we know about secondary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 21 (24), 2918-2929.
28. Frank, J., et al. (1998). Preventing disability from workrelated low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope-if we can just get all the players onside. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 158 (12), 1625-1631.
29. Fulton-Kehoe, D., et al. (2000). Years of productivity lost among injured workers in Washington state: Modeling disability burden in workers' compensation. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 37 (6), 656-662.
30. Guzman, J., et al. (2003). Stakeholder views of return to work after occupational injury. In T. Sullivan & J. Frank (Eds.), Preventing and managing disability at work (pp. 87-100). London: Taylor and Francis.
31. Guzman, J., et al. (2007). Key factors in back disability prevention: What influences the choice of priorities? Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 32 (9), E281-E289.
32. Hunt, H., Barth, P., & Leahy, M. (1996). The workers' compensation system of British Columbia: Still in transition. Upjohn Institute Technical Report No 95-008. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
33. Hunt, H., et al. (1993). Disability prevention among Michigan employers, 1988-1993. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
34. Jakobsen, K. (2001). Employment and reconstruction of the self: A model of space for maintenance of identify of occupation. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8, 40-48.
35. Johnstone, B., et al. (2003). Predictors of success for state vocational rehabilitation clients with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84 (2), 161-167.
36. Keogh, J. P., et al. (2000). The impact of occupational injury on injured worker and family: Outcomes of upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in Maryland workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 38 (5), 498-506.
37. Kirsh, B., & McKee, P. (2003). The needs and experiences of injured workers: A participatory research study. Work, 21 (3), 221-231.
38. Krause, N., Dasinger, L. K., & Neuhauser, F. (1998). Modified work and return to work: A review of the literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 8 (2), 113-139.
39. Kyes, K. B., Wickizer, T. M., & Franklin, G. (2003). Employer satisfaction with workers' compensation health care: Results of the Washington State Workers' Compensation Managed Care Pilot. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45 (3), 234-240.
40. Larsson, A., & Gard, G. (2003). How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employers' perspective. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 13 (3), 169-181.
41. Lerner, D. J., et al. (2000). A national survey of healthrelated work limitations among employed persons in the United States. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22 (5), 225-232.
42. Lerner, D., et al. (2001). The work limitations questionnaire. Medical Care, 39 (1), 72-85.
43. Leyshon, R. (2010). A stakeholder generated conceptualization for successful return to work outcome evaluation: A concept mapping approach. London, ON: The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, The University of Western Ontario.
44. Loisel, P. (2005). Intervention for return to work-what is really effective? Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 31 (4), 245-247.
45. Loisel, P., et al. (1997). A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine, 22 (24), 2911-2918.
46. Maiwald, K., et al. (2010). Evaluation of a workplace disability prevention intervention in Canada: Examining differing perceptions of stakeholders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21 (2), 179-189.
47. Malec, J. F., et al. (2000). A medical/vocational case coordination system for persons with brain injury: An evaluation of employment outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81 (8), 1007-1015.
48. Margoshes, B., & Webster, B. (2000). Why do occupational injuries have different health outcomes? In T. Mayer, R. Gatchel, & P. Polatin (Eds.), Occupational musculoskeletal disorders: Function, outcomes, and evidence. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
49. McMordie, W. R., Barker, S. L., & Paolo, T. M. (1990). Return to work (RTW) after head injury. Brain Injury, 4 (1), 57-69.
50. Mittag, O., et al. (2001). Return to work after myocardial infarction/coronary artery bypass grafting: Patients' and physicians' initial viewpoints and outcome 12 months later. Social Science & Medicine, 52 (9), 1441-1450.
51. Mortelmans, K., Donceel, P., & Lahaye, D. (2006a). Disability management through positive intervention in stakeholders' information asymmetry. A pilot study. Occupational Medicine (Lond), 56 (2), 129-136.
52. Mortelmans, A. K., et al. (2006b). Does enhanced information exchange between social insurance physicians and occupational physicians improve patient work resumption? A controlled intervention study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63 (7), 495-502.
53. Ouellette, V., et al. (2007). Worker satisfaction with a workplace injury prevention and return-to-work program in a large Canadian hospital: The importance of an integrated approach. Work, 28 (2), 175-181.
54. Power, P., & Hensherson, D. (2001). Assessment of career development and maturity. In B. Bolton (Ed.), Handbook of measurement and evaluation in rehabilitation (pp. 339-363). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
55. Pransky, G., Wasiak, R., & Himmelstein, J. (2001). Disability systems: The physician's role. Clinics in Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1, 829-842.
56. Pransky, G., et al. (2000). Outcomes in work-related upper extremity and low back injuries: Results of a retrospective study. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 37 (4), 400-409.
57. Pransky, G., et al. (2002). Improving the physician role in evaluating work ability and managing disability: A survey of primary care practitioners. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24 (16), 867-874.
58. Pransky, G., et al. (2005). Improving return to work research. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15 (4), 453-457.
59. Rainville, J., et al. (2005). The physician as disability advisor for patients with musculoskeletal complaints. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30 (22), 2579-2584.
60. Reynolds, C. A., Wagner, S. L., & Harder, H. G. (2006). Physician-stakeholder collaboration in disability management: A Canadian perspective on guidelines and expectations. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28 (15), 955-963.
61. Robinson, J. P., et al. (1997). Industrial rehabilitation medicine. 1. Why is industrial rehabilitation medicine unique? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78 (3 Suppl), S3-S9.
62. Rubin, S., & Roessler, R. (2001). Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
63. Rudolph, L., et al. (2002). What do injured workers think about their medical care and outcomes after work injury? Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44 (5), 425-434.
64. Schriner, K. (2001). A disability studies perspective on employment issues and policies for disabled people: An international view. In K. Seelman, G. Albrecht, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 642-662). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65. Schuring, M., et al. (2011). The effect of re-employment on perceived health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65 (7), 639-644.
66. Shaw, W. S., & Feuerstein, M. (2004). Generating workplace accommodations: Lessons learned from the integrated case management study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 14 (3), 207-216.
67. Shaw, W. S., et al. (2001). Case management services for work related upper extremity disorders. Integrating workplace accommodation and problem solving. AAOHN Journal, 49 (8), 378-389.
68. Shaw, W. S., et al. (2003). Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 13 (3), 129-142.
69. Shilts, J., & Managhan, J. (2003). WCD's injured worker survey. Corvallis, OR: Oregon Workers' Compensation Division.
70. Sim, J. (1999). Improving return-to-work strategies in the United States disability programs, with analysis of program practices in Germany and Sweden. Social Security Bulletin, 62 (3), 41-50.
71. Soklaridis, S., et al. (2011). "Can you go back to work?": Family physicians' experiences with assessing patients' functional ability to return to work. Canadian Family Physician, 57 (2), 202-209.
72. Strunin, L., & Boden, L. I. (2004a). The workers' compensation system: Worker friend or foe? American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 45 (4), 338-345.
73. Strunin, L., & Boden, L. I. (2004b). Family consequences of chronic back pain. Social Science & Medicine, 58 (7), 1385-1393.
74. Sum, J., & Frank, J. (2001). Return-to-work in California: Listening to stakeholders' voices. Berkeley: Commission on Health & Safety and Workers' Compensation.
75. Szymanski, E., et al. (2003). Work and disability. In E. Szymanski & R. Parker (Eds.), Work and disability: Basic constructs (pp. 1-26). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
76. Thomason, T. (2003). Economic incentives and workplace safety. In T. J. Sullivan & J. W. Frank (Eds.), Preventing and managing disabling injury at work (pp. 183-204). London: Taylor and Francis.
77. Thulesius, H. O., & Grahn, B. E. (2007). Reincentivizing-a new theory of work and work absence. BMC Health Services Research, 7, 100.
78. Uegaki, K., et al. (2007). Consensus-based findings and recommendations for estimating the costs of healthrelated productivity loss from a company's perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 33 (2), 122-130.
79. van Oostrom, S. H., et al. (2009). Workplace interventions for preventing work disability. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD006955.
80. Waddell, G., Aylward, M., & Sawney, P. (2002). Back pain, incapacity for work and social security benefits: An international literature review and analysis. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
81. Waddell, G., & Burton, K. (2006). Is work good for your health and well-being? Great Britain: Department for Work and Pensions.
82. Wasiak, R., et al. (2004). Risk factors for recurrent episodes of care and work disability: Case of low back pain. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46 (1), 68-76.
83. Westmorland, M., & Williams, R. (2002). Employers and policy makers can make a difference to the employment of persons with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24 (15), 802-809.
84. Westmorland, M., et al. (2002). Perspectives on work (re) entry for persons with disabilities: Implications for clinicians. Work, 18 (1), 29-40.
85. Wickizer, T. M., et al. (2001). Improving the quality of workers' compensation health care delivery: The Washington State Occupational Health Services Project. The Milbank Quarterly, 79 (1), 5-33.
86. Wickizer, T. M., et al. (2004). Patient satisfaction, treatment experience, and disability outcomes in a population-based cohort of injured workers in Washington state: Implications for quality improvement. Health Services Research, 39 (4 Pt 1), 727-748.
87. Williams, R. M., & Westmorland, M. (2002). Perspectives on workplace disability management: A review of the literature. Work, 19 (1), 87-93.
88. Workplace Health Safety and Compensation Commission of New Brunswick. (2001). Report to stakeholders: Working hard and working together. New Brunswick: Workplace Health, Safety, and Compensation Commission of New Brunswick.
89. World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. WHO/EIP/GPE/CAS/01.3. Geneva: World Health Organization.
90. Yassi, A. (2005). Health promotion in the workplace-the merging of the paradigms. Methods of Information in Medicine, 44 (2), 278-284.
91. Yassi, A., et al. (1990). Evaluating medical performance in the diagnosis and treatment of occupational health problems: A standardized patient approach. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 32 (7), 582-585.
92. Ydreborg, B., Ekberg, K., & Nilsson, K. (2007). Swedish social insurance officers' experiences of difficulties in assessing applications for disability pensions-an interview study. BMC Public Health, 7, 128.
93. Young, A. E., et al. (2005). Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: Stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15 (4), 543-556.