Do Peer Reviews Help Improve Student Writing Abilities in an EFL High School Classroom?

TESOL Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 450-470

  Kurihara, Noriko ^a  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994644451     PISSN: 10567941     EISSN: 19493533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tesj.282     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 215–237. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5
2. Bruffee, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind.” College English, 46, 635–652. doi:10.2307/376924
3. Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1994). Writing groups: Cross cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(1), 17–30. doi:10.1016/1060-3743(94)90003-5
4. Chaudron, C. (1984). The effects of feedback on students’ composition revisions. RELC Journal, 15(2), 1–14. doi:10.1177/003368828401500201
5. Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 257–276. doi:10.1016/1060-3743(94)90019-1
6. Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Kamimura, T. (2006). Effects of peer feedback on EFL student writers at different levels of English proficiency: A Japanese context. TESL Canada Journal, 23(2), 12–39. doi:10.18806/tesl.v23i2.53
8. Kurihara, N. (2014). The adoption of the process-oriented writing approach in a Japanese high school classroom. The Language Teacher, 38(5), 31–36.
9. Leki, I. (1990). Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes. CATESOL Journal, 3, 5–19.
10. Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
11. Mendonҫa, C. O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 4, 745–769. doi:10.2307/3587558
12. Min, H. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33, 293–308. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003
13. Min, H. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118–141. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
14. Nelson, G., & Murphy, J. M. (1992). An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 171–193. doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90002-7
15. Nystrand, M. (1989). A social-interactive model of writing. Written Communication, 6(1), 66–85. doi:10.1177/0741088389006001005
16. Paulus, T. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265–289. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9
17. Sengupta, S. (1998). From text revision to text improvement: A story of secondary school composition. RELC Journal, 29(1), 110–137. doi:10.1177/003368829802900107
18. Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions. In B. Kroll (Ed.), ESL second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 11–23). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Tsui, A., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 147–170. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9
20. Villamil, O. S., & Guerrero, M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51–75. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90015-6
21. Villamil, O. S., & Guerrero, M. (2006). Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 23–41). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Weir, C. J. (1990). Communicative language testing. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
24. Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179–200. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90015-6
25. Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209–223. doi:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1
26. Zhao, H. (2012). Who takes the floor? Peer feedback or teacher feedback: An investigation of Chinese university English learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing. In T. Muller, S. Herder, J. Adamson, & P. Brown (Eds.), Innovating EFL teaching in Asia (pp. 245–252). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.