Avoiding ethics pitfalls in publishing: a perspective from COPE

Oral Diseases

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 416-419

  Pierson, C A ^a  

^a Committee on Publication Ethics ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

authorship; data management; ethics; plagiarism; reviewers

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MISCONDUCT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; REVIEW; WRITING; ETHICS; PUBLICATION;

GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84994607565     PISSN: 1354523X     EISSN: 16010825     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/odi.12539     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. BioMed Central (2014). How to deal with text recycling. Available at http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines [accessed on 5 July 2016].
2. COPE Council (2014). What constitutes authorship? COPE Discussion Document. Available at http://publicationethics.org/resources/discussion-documents [accessed on 5 July 2016].
3. Hames I (ed.) (2007). Peer Review and Manuscript Management in Scientific Journals: Guidelines for Good Practice, 1st edn. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
4. Hames I, on behalf of COPE (2013).COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. Available at http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines [accessed on 5 July 2016].
5. Hames I, Pierson C, Ridgeway N., Barbour V (2013) Publication Ethics: 16 years of COPE. Presented at the 7th International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication: Chicago, IL. Available at: http://publicationethics.org/cope-case-taxonomy [accessed on 5 July 2016].
6. Hicks R, Berg JA (2014). Multiple publications from a single study: ethical dilemmas. American Assoc Nurse Prac 26: 233–235.
7. Ioannidis JP (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2: e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
8. Pierson CA (2015). Lessons learned from yet another case of fake science. American Assoc Nurse Prac 27: 413–414.
9. Reproducing COPE resources (July, 2016) COPE Digest. Available at: http://publicationethics.org/cope-newsletter [accessed on 5 July 2016].
10. Wager E, Field E, Grossman L (2003). Good Publication Practice for Pharmaceutical Companies. Curr Med Res Opin 19: 149–154.
11. Warne V. (2016). Rewarding reviewers – sense or sensibility? A Wiley study explained Learned Publishing, 29: 41–50.