Rewarding reviewers – Sense or sensibility? A Wiley study explained

Learned Publishing

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 41-50

  Warne, Verity ^a  

^a John Wiley and Sons   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994738898     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: 17414857     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/leap.1002     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Black, N., van Rooyen, S., Godlee, F., Smith, R., & Evans, S. (1998).Whatmakes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? JAMA, 280(3), 231–233. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.231
2. Coin, L. (2015, January 21). A currency for peer review: PubCreds and Academic Karma. [Web log post] Message posted to http://software.ac.uk/blog
3. Glasziou, P., Altman, D. G., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Clarke, M., Julious, S., …Wager, E. (2014). Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. The Lancet, 383(9913), 267–276. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X
4. McCook, A. (2015, August 17). 64 more papers retracted for fake reviews, this time from Springer journals [Blog post]. Message posted to http://retractionwatch.com
5. Meadows, A. (2015, January 5). Recognition for peer review and editing in Australia – and beyond? [Blog post]. Message posted to http://exchanges.wiley.com/blog
6. Moher, D. (2014, October 7). Training for peer review: why we need it and how to get there. [Blog post]. Message posted to http://biome.biomedcentral.com
7. Rubriq (2013, June 3).How we found 15million hours of lost time [Blog post]. Message posted to http://blog.rubriq.com
8. Seife, C. (2015, April 1). Science’s Big Scandal [Blog post]. Message posted to http://www.slate.com/
9. Sense About Science (2009). Peer Review Survey. Retrieved 24 September 2014 from http://www.senseaboutscience.org/pages/peer-reviewsurvey-2009.html
10. Sense About Science (2012). Recognise Reviewing. Retrieved 24 September 2015 from http://www.senseaboutscience.org/pages/letter-to-hefcerecognise-reviewing-in-the-ref.html
11. Ware, M. (2008). Peer Review: Benefits, Perceptions and Alternatives (PRC Summary Papers 4). Publishing Research Consortium. Retrieved 18 September 2015 from http://publishingresearchconsortium.com/index.php/108-prc-projects/summary-papers/peer-review-in-scholarly-journalssummary-paper
12. Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2012). The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. Oxford, UK: International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers. Retrieved 18 September 2015 from http://www.stm-assoc.org/2012_12_11_STM_Report_2012.pdf