A data integration framework to support Triad projects

Remediation

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 21-37

  Mack, Jim ^a   Crumbling, Deana M ^b   Ellerbusch, Fred ^a,c  

^a NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994586675     PISSN: 10515658     EISSN: 15206831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rem.20030     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (1998a). Standard guide for accelerated site characterization for confirmed or suspected petroleum releases. ASTM E-1912-98. West Conshohocken, PA: Author.
2. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (1998b). Standard practice for expedited site characterization of vadose zone and ground water contamination at hazardous waste contaminated sites. ASTM D-6235-98. West Conshohocken, PA: Author.
3. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). (1999). Guide for developing and implementing short term measures or early actions for site remediation. ASTM D-5745-95. West Conshohocken, PA: Author.
4. Applegate, J. L., & Fitton, D. M. (1997). Rapid site assessment applied to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Drycleaning Solver Cleanup Program. In Proceedings of the Superfund XVIII Conference (Vol. 2, pp.695–703), Washington, DC.
5. Burton, J. C., Walker, J. L., Aggarwal, P. K., & Meyer, W. T. (1995). Expedited site characterization: An integrated approach for cost- and time-effective remedial investigation. Argonne, IL: Argonne National Laboratory.
6. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program. (2000). Expedited site assessment: The CD (Version 1.0)—UST site investigation guidance for a new millennium. Hartford, CT: Author.
7. Crumbling, D., Groenjes, C., Lesnik, B., Lynch, K., Shockley, J., VanEe, J., et al. (2001). Applying the concept of effective data to contaminated sites could reduce costs and improve cleanups. Environmental Science and Technology, 35(19), 405A–409A.
8. Crumbling, D. M., Griffith, J., & Powell, D. M. (2003). Improving decision quality: Making the case for adopting next-generation site characterization practices. Remediation, 13(2), 91–111.
9. Ellerbusch, F., Mack, J., & Shim, J. S. (2004). Using the Triad approach to expedite the acquisition of an Abbott District School Site. Remediation, 14(2), 85–105.
10. Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC). (2003). Technical and regulatory guidance for the Triad approach: A new paradigm for environmental project management (SCM-1). Prepared by the ITRC Sampling, Characterization and Monitoring Team. Washington, DC.
11. Retrieved October 20, 2004, from http://www.itrcweb.org/SCM-1.pdf.
12. Mack, J., Ellerbusch, F., & Librizzi, W. (2003). Characterizing a Brownfields recreational reuse scenario using the Triad approach—Assunpink Creek Greenways Project. Remediation, 13(4), 41–59.
13. Robbat, A. (1994, May). Case Study Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Methods development, feasibility, cost/benefit analysis for performing on-site thermal desorption gas chromatography/mass spectrometry of organic compounds at Army facilities. Paper prepared for the U.S. Army Environmental Engineering Center, Aberdeen, MD.
14. Robbat, A. (1997). Dynamic workplans and field analytics: The keys to cost effective site characterization and cleanup. Medford, MA: Tufts University Center for Field Analytical Studies and Technology.
15. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. (1995). Accelerated site assessment process procedure: A guidance manual for accessing LPST sites in Texas. Austin, TX: Author.
16. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (1997). Expedited site assessment tools for underground storage tank sites: A guide for regulators. EPA 510-B-97-001. Washington, DC: Office of Underground Storage Tanks, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
17. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (2000). Innovations in site characterization. Case study: Site cleanup of the Wenatchee Tree Fruit Test plot site using a dynamic work plan. EPA-542-R-00-009. Washington, DC: Author.
18. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (2001). Improving sampling, analysis, and data management for site investigations and cleanups. EPA-542-F-01-030a. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
19. Woll, B., Mack, J., Ellerbusch, F., & Vetter. J. (2003). Facilitating Brownfields transactions using Triad and environmental insurance. Remediation, 13(2), 113–130.