Facilitating brownfields transactions using triad and environmental insurance

Remediation

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 113-130

  Woll, Bryn ^a,b   Mack, James ^c   Ellerbusch, Fred ^c,d   Vetter, James R ^a  

^a Stevens Institute of Technology ^*

^b STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d University of Medicine and Dentistry   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992953885     PISSN: 10515658     EISSN: 15206831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rem.10067     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alberini, A., & Austin, D. (1999). Accidents waiting to happen: Liability and toxic pollution releases (Discussion paper 99-29). Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
2. Arrandale, T. (1997). Lots of trouble; Old industrial sites aren't usually as contaminated as people think. Butit's what people think that matters. Governing, 10(10), 20–24.
3. Bartsch, C., Andress, C., Setzman, J., & Cooney, D. (1991). New life for old buildings: Confronting environmental and economic barriers to industrial reuse. Washington DC: Northeast-Midwest Institute.
4. Bartsch, C., & Collaton, E. (1997). Cleaning and reusing contaminated properties. Westport CT: Praeger.
5. Bartsch, C., & Munson, R. (1994). Restoring contaminated industrial sites. Issues in Science and Technology, 10(3), 74.
6. Bressler, A. J., & Hannah, J. A. (2000). Redevelopment: A risk versus reward proposition. International Risk Management Institute. Available: http://www.irmi.com/expert/articles/hannah003.asp.
7. Bush, G. W. (2001). Address of the President to the Joint Session of Congress, February 27, 2001. The United States Congress. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/02/20010228.html.
8. Clinton, W. J. (1998). Remarks by the President at the U.S. Conference of Mayors Breakfast, January 30, 1998. U.S. Conference of Mayors. Available: http://clinton4.nara.gov/textonly/WH/New/html/19980130-25315.html.
9. Crumbling, D., et al. (2001, October 1). Applying the concept of effective data to contaminated sites could reduce costs and improvecleanups. Environmental Science and Technology, 405A–409A.
10. ELI (Environmental Law Institute). (1998). An analysis of state superfund programs: 50 state study, 1998 update. Washington, DC.
11. NACo (National Association of Counties). (1998). NACo resolution urging cleanup of brownfields, section 2K of the American County Platform andResolutions. Washington, DC.
12. NGA (National Governors' Association). (2000). Where do we grow from here? New mission for brownfields—Attacking sprawl by revitalizingolder communities. Washington, DC.
13. NRC (National Research Council). (1983). Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
14. OTA (Office of Technology Assessment). (1995). State of the states on brownfields: Programs for cleanup and reuse of contaminated sites. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States.
15. Robbat, A. (1997). Dynamic workplans and field analytics: The keys to cost effective site characterization andcleanup. Medford, MA: Tufts University Center for Field Analytical Studies andTechnology.
16. Savage, S. (2002). The flaw of averages. Harvard Business Review, 11(80), 18–19.
17. Silkowski-Hackett, M., & Schiavo, M.C. (1996). The challenge of brownfields redevelopment. Society for Risk Analysis 1996 Annual Meeting.
18. Simons, R. (1998). Turning brownfields into greenbacks—Developing and financing environmentally contaminated urbanreal estate. Washington DC: Urban Land Institute.
19. Simons, R. (1999). How many brownfields are out there? An economic base contraction analysis of 31 U.S.cities. Public Works Management and Policy, 2(3), 267–273.
20. TRC Environmental Corporation. (1993). Feasibility study report Albert Steel Drum/Prentiss Drug and Chemical Site, Newark, NewJersey. Windsor, CT: TRC Environmental Corporation.
21. USCoM (U.S. Conference of Mayors). (2000). Recycling America's land—A national report on brownfields redevelopment, Volume3. Washington, DC.
22. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (1997). Expediting cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields: Addressing the major barriers to private sectorinvolvement—Real or perceived. Washington, DC.
23. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2001, June). Improving sampling, analysis, and data management for site investigations and cleanups(EPA-542-F-01-030a). Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
24. USGAO (U.S, Government Accounting Office). (1996). Superfund: Barriers to brownfields redevelopment(GAO/RCED-96-125). Washington, DC.
25. Van Horn, C., Dixon, K., & Lawler, G. (1999). Turning brownfields in jobfields. New Brunswick, NJ: John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development, RutgersUniversity.