Sustainability assessment to support governmental biodiesel policy in Colombia: A system dynamics model

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 141, Issue , 2017, Pages 1145-1163

  Espinoza, A ^a,c   Bautista, S ^d   Narvaez P C ^b   Alfaro, M ^c   Camargo, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE SANTIAGO DE CHILE   (Chile)

^d UNIVERSIDAD EL BOSQUE   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Biodiesel; Policy analysis; Sustainability; System dynamics

Indexed keywords

BIODIESEL; COMMERCE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOSSIL FUELS; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEM THEORY;

BIODIESEL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; POLICY ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY DIMENSIONS; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODEL; TRANSPORT SECTORS;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84994520415     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.168     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Acuerdo 218, Colombian Government. 2012 Available on: http://web.fedepalma.org/sites/default/files/files/Fedepalma/acuerdo%20218%20de%202012_actualizacionesymodificaciones_corte%20oct%202013.pdf.
2. Acuerdo 258, Colombian Government. 2013 Available on: http://web.fedepalma.org/sites/default/files/files/Fedepalma/ACUERDOFEP258_2013_modificacionmetodologiacalculooperacionesestabilizacion.pdf.
3. Ahi, P., Searcy, C., Assessing sustainability in the supply chain: a triple bottom line approach. Appl. Math. Model. 39:10–11 (1 June 2015), 2882–2896, 10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.055.
4. Albin, S., Building a System Dynamics Model Part 1: Conceptualization 34. 1997.
5. American Society for Cybernetics, Systems Analysis. American Society for Cybernetics (ASC): Foundations: ASC GLOSSARY. 2014 http://www.asc-cybernetics.org/foundations/ASCGlossary.htm (accessed 12.12.14.).
6. Bantz, S.G., Deaton, M.L., Understanding U.S. Biodiesel industry growth using system dynamics modeling. IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, 2006, 156–161.
7. Barisa, A., Romagnoli, F., Blumberga, A., Blumberga, D., Future biodiesel policy designs and consumption patterns in Latvia: a system dynamics model. J. Clean. Prod., Sustain. Dev. Energy, Water Environ. Syst. 88 (2015), 71–82, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.067.
8. Barlas, Y., Model validation in system dynamics. International Systems Dynamics Conference. Stirling, Scotland, 1994, 10.
9. Barlas, Y., Multiple tests for validation of system dynamics type of simulation models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 42 (1989), 59–87, 10.1016/0377-2217(89)90059-3.
10. Bautista, S., et al. Biodiesel -TBL+: a new hierarchical sustainability assessment framework of PC&I for biodiesel production. Ecol. Indic. 69 (October 2016), 803–817.
11. Beltràn Vargas, J.E., Formulación de un modelo dinámico de simulación ecológica del Humedal de Jaboque – Bogotá D.C., con fines de restauración y conservación (phd). 2012, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
12. Bérard, C., Group model building using system dynamics: an analysis of methodological frameworks. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods, 8, 2010, 35.
13. Buytaert, V., Muys, B., Devriendt, N., Pelkmans, L., Kretzschmar, J.G., Samson, R., Towards integrated sustainability assessment for energetic use of biomass: a state of the art evaluation of assessment tools. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15 (2011), 3918–3933, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.036.
14. Chang, P.-L., Ho, S.-P., Hsu, C.-W., Dynamic simulation of government subsidy policy effects on solar water heaters installation in Taiwan. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 20 (2013), 385–396, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.009.
15. Congresso Nacional Brazil, 2014. LEI No 13.033.
16. Consorcio CUE, Evaluación del ciclo de vida de la cadena de producción de biocombustibles en Colombia. Issuu. 2012 http://issuu.com/asocana/docs/capitulo_0_resumen_ejecutivo_final (Accessed 16 December 2014).
17. Decreto 2025, Colombian Government. 1996 Available on: http://web.fedepalma.org/sites/default/files/files/Fedepalma/decreto225de1996.pdf.
18. Decreto 2354, Colombian Government. 1996 Available on: http://web.fedepalma.org/sites/default/files/files/Fedepalma/decreto2354_1996.pdf.
19. de Wit, M., Junginger, M., Lensink, S., Londo, M., Faaij, A., Competition between biofuels: modeling technological learning and cost reductions over time. Biomass Bioenergy 34 (2010), 203–217, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.07.012.
20. Draper, N.R., Smith, H., Draper, N.R., Applied regression analysis. 1998, John Wiley & Sons, New York Edición: Revised.
21. EIA, (U.S. Energy Information Administration), Biodiesel Overview - U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2014 Total Energy - US Energy Inf. Adm. http://www.eia.gov/beta/MER/index.cfm?tbl=T10.04#/?f=A&start=2001&end=2013&charted=5-22 (Accessed 12 December 2014).
22. European Parliament, Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, L 140. 2009.
23. FAO, (Food and Agriculture Organization of the Nations), The State of Food and Agriculture 2008. 2008, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
24. Fedebiocombustibles, (Federación Nacional de Biocombustibles de Colombia), Biodiesel Production and Sales. 2014 http://www.fedebiocombustibles.com/v3/estadistica-produccion-titulo-Biodiesel.htm (Accessed 16 December 2014).
25. Fedepalma, (Federación Nacional de Cultivadores de Palma de Aceite), Statistical Yearbook. 2012.
26. Fontaine, E.R., Teoria de Los Precios - 5b* Edicion. Édition: 5, 2000, Alfaomega Grupo Editor, México.
27. Forrester, J.W., Industrial Dynamics. 2013, Martino Fine Books.
28. Franco, C.J., Zapata, S., Dyner, I., Simulation for assessing the liberalization of biofuels. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 41 (2015), 298–307, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.025.
29. Garcés, I.C., Cuéllar, S.M., Productos derivados de la industria de la palma de aceite. 1996 Usos. Presented at the Primer Curso Internacional Sobre El Cultivo de la Palma de Aceite en Colombia, p. 16.
30. Godoy, L., Bartó, C., Validación y valoración de modelos en la Dinámica de Sistemas. Rev. Argent. Enseñanza Ing., 2002, 31–47.
31. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., Jafarian, A., A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J. Clean. Prod. 47 (2013), 345–354, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014.
32. Hacking, T., Guthrie, P., A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 28 (2008), 73–89, 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.002.
33. Law 693, Colombian Congress. 2001 Available on: http://www.minminas.gov.co/documents/10180//23517//21462-3660.pdf.
34. Law 788, Colombian Congress. 2002 Available on: http://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=7260.
35. Law 939, Colombian Congress. 2004 Available on: https://www.minambiente.gov.co/images/normativa/leyes/2004/ley_0939_2004.pdf.
36. Lee, S., Geum, Y., Lee, H., Park, Y., Dynamic and multidimensional measurement of product-service system (PSS) sustainability: a triple bottom line (TBL)-based system dynamics approach. J. Clean. Prod. 32 (2012), 173–182, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.032.
37. Marchetti, J.M., The effect of economic variables over a biodiesel production plant. Energy Convers. Manag. 52 (2011), 3227–3233, 10.1016/j.enconman.2011.05.008.
38. Michael, J.R., Robert, A.T., Introduction to System Dynamics, Adapted from Foundations of System Dynamics Modeling Michael J. Radzicki, Ph.D. 1997 Sustainable Solutions, Inc. Copyright © 1997. ed. U.S. Department of Energy's.
39. MinAgricultura, C., Federación Nacional de Biocombustibles de Colombia. Procesos Los Biocombustibles. http://www.fedebiocombustibles.com/v3/main-pagina-id-4-titulo-proceso_de_los_biocombustibles.htm, 2014 (Accessed 15 December 2014).
40. MinAmbiente, MinMinas, Resolución 9 0963. 2014.
41. MinMinas, Resolución 9 1664. 2012.
42. MinMinas, C., Federación Nacional de Biocombustibles de Colombia. Resoluciones Precios. 2014 http://www.fedebiocombustibles.com/v3/main-pagina-id-30.htm (Accessed 12 December 2014).
43. MinMinas, MinAgricultura, MinAmbiente, MinComercio, Industria Y Turismo, MinSalud, MinHacienda, MinTransporte, Colciencias. 2008 Conpes 3510.
44. MinMinas, UPME, (Unidad de Planeación Minero Energética), Proyección de Demanda de Energía en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia. 2010.
45. Musango, J.K., Brent, A.C., Amigun, B., Pretorius, L., Hans, M., A System Dynamics Approach to Technology Sustainability Assessment : the Case of Biodiesel Developments in South Africa, vol. 32, 2012, 639–651, 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.06.003.
46. Musango, J.K., Brent, A.C., Amigun, B., Pretorius, L., Müller, H., Technology sustainability assessment of biodiesel development in South Africa : a system dynamics approach. Energy 36 (2011), 6922–6940, 10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.028.
47. Olivier, J., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Muntean, M., Peters, J., TRENDS IN GLOBAL CO2 EMISSIONS: 2014 Report., 2014, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
48. Oviedo, S., Camargo, M., Narváez, P., Morel, L., Forradellas, R., Contribución de la Dinámica de sistemas a la modelización de escenarios para la evaluación de la cadena de producción de biocombustibles. 2010, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, Francia.
49. Oviedo, S., Narváez, P., Camargo, M., Morel, L., Forradellas, Forecasting of the world production of biodiésel: a system dynamics modeling approach. Presented at the International Association for Management of Technology, IAMOT, Proceedings. 20th International Conference on Management of Technology, Miami, USA, 2011, 12.
50. Schade, B., Wiesenthal, T., Biofuels: a model based assessment under uncertainty applying the Monte Carlo method. J. Policy Model. 33 (2011), 92–126, 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.10.008.
51. SIGP, (Sistema de Información de Petroleo y Gas Colombiano), PETROLEO - REFINACIÓN - Consumo de Combustible Mensual relacionada con Diésel (ACPM). 2014 http://www.upme.gov.co/generadorconsultas/Consulta_Series.aspx?idModulo=3&tipoSerie=202&grupo=542 (Accessed 12 December 2014).
52. UPME (Unidad de Planeación Minero Energética), Costo Fiscal de Subsidios y Exenciones Tributarias al Consumo de Gasolina y ACPM Subdirección de Hidrocarburos. Bogotá, Colombia. 2014.
53. US EPA, (United States Environmental Protection Agency), Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS): Overview and Issues. 2013.
54. Wang, Y., Chang, X., Chen, Z., Zhong, Y., Fan, T., Impact of subsidy policies on recycling and remanufacturing using system dynamics methodology: a case of auto parts in China. J. Clean. Prod. 74 (2014), 161–171, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.023.
55. Yazan, D.M., Claudio Garavelli, A., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Albino, V., The effect of spatial variables on the economic and environmental performance of bioenergy production chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 131 (2011), 224–233, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.017.
56. Zhang, J., He, K., Shi, X., Zhao, Y., Comparison of particle emissions from an engine operating on biodiesel and petroleum diesel. Fuel 90 (2011), 2089–2097, 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.01.039.