Biodiesel-triple bottom line (TBL): A new hierarchical sustainability assessment framework of principles criteria & indicators (PC&I) for biodiesel production. Part II-validation

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 69, Issue , 2016, Pages 803-817

  Bautista, S ^a   Enjolras, M ^b   Narvaez, P ^a   Camargo, M ^b   Morel, L ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

Biodiesel; Expert survey; Framework; Sustainability criteria

Indexed keywords

BIODIESEL; BIODIVERSITY; COMPETITION; DATA VISUALIZATION; LAND USE; SURVEYS;

EXPERT SURVEY; FRAMEWORK; INDIRECT LAND-USE CHANGES; PRINCIPLES AND CRITERION; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY CRITERIA; SUSTAINABILITY DIMENSIONS; SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BIOFUEL; DIESEL; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; EXPERT SYSTEM; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; LITERATURE REVIEW; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 84973875455     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.046     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. J. Augusiak, P.J. Van den Brink, and V. Grimm Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to evaludation: a review of terminology and a practical approach Ecol. Modell. 280 2014 117 128
2. S. Barrett European Expert Group reports on future transport fuels Fuel Cells Bull. 2011 2 2011 12 16
3. S. Bautista, and et al. Biodiesel -TBL+: a new hierarchical sustainability assessment framework of PC&I for biodiesel production - part I Ecol. Indic. 60 2016 84 107 (Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.020)
4. A. Bisaro, and et al. Global drivers setting desertification research priorities: insights from a stakeholder consultation forum Land Degrad. Dev. 25 1 2014 5 16
5. A.C. Brent, and J.K. Musango Application of a new framework for energy technology sustainability assessment: results from survey 22nd Internationa Conference for the International Association of Management of Thecnology IAMOT 2013 Science, Technology and Innovation in the Emerging Market Economies 2013 1 14
6. T. Buchholz, V.a. Luzadis, and T.a. Volk Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey J. Clean. Prod. 17 Suppl. 1 2009 S86 S98 (Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.015.)
7. Bueren, E.L.; Van, Blom, E.; 1996. Hierarchical Framework for the Formulation of Sustainable Forest Management Standards, vol. 1, p. 1-97.
8. V. Buytaert, and et al. Towards integrated sustainability assessment for energetic use of biomass: a state of the art evaluation of assessment tools Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15 8 2011 3918 3933 (Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.036)
9. Cramer, J. et al.; 2007. Testing Framework for Sustainable Biomass (Cramer Criteria), The Netherlands.; pp. 1-16.
10. Cucek, L.; Kravanja, Z.; 2012. A Review of Footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability, p. 34.
11. Dreier, T.; Geiger, B.; Wagner, U.; 1998. Environmental Impacts and System Analysis of Biofuels. In: H. Kopetz et al. (Eds.) Biomass for Energy and Industry: 10th European Conference and Technology Exhibition, proceedings of the International Conference. Wurzburg, pp. 544-548. Available at: http://www.gbv.de/dms/tib-ub-hannover/246435062. pdf.
12. FAO, BEFSCI, 2011. A Compilation of Bioenergy Sustainability Initiatives Overview.
13. FAO, F. and A.O. of the U.N. & BEFSCI, B. and F.S.C. and I. project, 2012. A compilation of Tools and Methodologies to Assess the Sustainability of Modern Bioenergy.
14. FAO, F. and A.O. of the U.N.; 2013. Biofuels and the sustainability challenge: A global assessment of policies for biofuels and related feedstocks.
15. Fao, F. and A.O. of the U.N. & Befsci, B. and F.S.C. and I.P.; 2007. Sustainability criteria for biomass and biofuels.; pp. 1-5. Available at: http://www.worldenergy.org/documents/annex8sustcritrgbelg.pdf.
16. G. Finnveden, and T. Ekvall Life-cycle assessment as a decision-support tool - the case of recycling versus incineration of paper Resour. Conserva. Recycl. 24 3-4 1998 235 256 (Available at: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031782337&partnerID=tZOtx3y1 (accessed 11.2.2016)
17. G. Fiorese, and et al. Advanced biofuels: future perspectives from an expert elicitation survey Energy Policy 56 2013 293 311
18. M.J. Florin, G.W.J. van de Ven, and M.K. van Ittersum What drives sustainable biofuels? A review of indicator assessments of biofuel production systems involving smallholder farmers Environ. Sci. Policy 2013 1 16
19. E. Fort, P. Lobies, and A. Bergeret Phénomène de rupture professionnelle chez des salariés en consultation en service de maladie professionnelle. Analyse factorielle et classification Arch. Mal. Prof. Environ. 72 5 2011 426 438
20. Fritsche, U. et al.; 2006. Sustainability Standards for Bioenergy, Frankfurt
21. E. Gnansounou Assessing the sustainability of biofuels: a logic-based model Energy 36 4 2011 2089 2096 (Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.027.)
22. T. Hacking, and P. Guthrie A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 28 2-3 2008 73 89
23. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman The elements of statistical learning Math. Intell. 27 2009 p721
24. I. Herman, and et al. Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: a survey IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 6 1 2000 24 43
25. J. Hill, and et al. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 30 2006 11206 11210
26. Y. Hu Efficient and high quality force-directed graph drawing Math. J. 10 1 2005 37 71
27. R. Janssen, and D.D. Rutz Sustainability of biofuels in Latin America: risks and opportunities Energy Policy 39 10 2011 5717 5725 (Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.047)
28. M. Kaltschmitt, G.A. Reinhardt, and T. Stelzer Life cycle analysis of biofuels under different environmental aspects Biomass Bioenergy 12 2 1997 121 134 Available at: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030616102&partnerID=tZOtx3y1 (accessed 27.12.2015).
29. B. Kampman, A. Grinsven, and H. Croezen Sustainable Alternatives for Land-based Biofuels in the European Union Assessment of Options and Development of a Policy Strategy 2012 C. Delft Delft
30. T. Kurka, and D. Blackwood Participatory selection of sustainability criteria and indicators for bioenergy developments Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 24 2013 92 102 (Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.062)
31. S. Lee, and et al. Dynamic and multidimensional measurement of product-service system (PSS) sustainability: a triple bottom line (TBL)-based system dynamics approach J. Clean. Prod. 32 2012 173 182
32. H.L. MacLean, and et al. A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 50 10 2000 1769 1779 (Available at: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0033625794&partnerID=tZOtx3y1)
33. a. Markevičius, and et al. Trends and sustainability criteria of the production and use of liquid biofuels Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 14 9 2010 3226 3231
34. G. Mendoza, and et al. Guidelines for applying Multi-Criteria Analysis to the assessment of criteria an d indicators Criteria Indic. Toolbox Ser. 1999 (Available at: http://www.cifor.org/acm/methods/toolbox1.html)
35. J.-F. Petiot, and B. Yannou Measuring consumer perceptions for a better comprehension, specification and assessment of product semantics Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 33 6 2004 507 525
36. G. Reinhardt Life cycle assessments (LCAs) of liquid biofuels: latest results In 2nd European Motor Biofuels Forum, Proceedings, Graz, AT Graz 1996 297 303 Available at: https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/tema%3ATEMAM97040096579/Life-cycle-assessments-LCAs-of-liquid-biofuels/#morelikethis (accessed 11.12.2016).
37. Scarlat, N.; 2011. Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: A global overview.; 39, pp. 1630-1646.
38. E.E. Silva Lora, and et al. Issues to consider, existing tools and constraints in biofuels sustainability assessments Energy 36 4 2011 2097 2110 (Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.012)
39. C. Syms Principal components analysis S.E. Jørgensen, B.D. Fath, Encyclopedia of Ecology 2008 Academic Press Oxford 2940 2949
40. T. Tickner 11th International Specialist Conference on Biofuels in Berlin: Expert Forums on Biodiesel, Bioethanol, Biomethane and Biomass Demand for Biofuel Production Give Insights into the Latest Developments. Automotive Industries AI 193 12 2013
41. N. Van Cauwenbergh, and et al. SAFE-A hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 120 2-4 2007 229 242
42. J.P. Van der Sluijs, and et al. Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system Risk Anal. 25 2 2005 481 492
43. S. Vermeulen, and L. Cotula Over the heads of local people: consultation, consent, and recompense in large-scale land deals for biofuels projects in Africa J. Peasant Stud. 37 4 2010 899 916
44. J.H. Ward Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58 301 1963 236 244
45. R. Zah, and et al. Standardized and simplified life-cycle assessment (LCA) as a driver for more sustainable biofuels J. Clean. Prod. 17 Suppl 1 2009 102 105
46. Zemanek, G.; Reinhardt, G.; 1999. First total evaluation of the ecological comparison: Biofuels versus conventional fuels. In: R. P. Overend, E. Chornet (Eds.) Biomass, a Growth Opportunity in Green Energy and Value-added Products: Proceedings of the 4th Biomass Conference of the Americas. Biomass, a Growth Opportunity in Green Energy and Value-added Products: Proceedings of the 4th Biomass Conference of the Americas. Elsevier Science, pp. 393-399. Available at: https://books.google.com.co/books?id=Db9GAAAAYAAJ.