Implications of climate change mitigation for sustainable development

Environmental Research Letters

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2016, Pages

  Jakob, Michael ^a   Steckel, Jan Christoph ^a,b,c  

^a MERCATOR RESEARCH INSTITUTE ON GLOBAL COMMONS AND CLIMATE CHANGE   (Germany)

^b Potsdam Institute for Climate Change Impact Research   (Germany)

^c TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

climate scenarios; multiple objectives; sustainable development

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; CLIMATE MODELS; COMMERCE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENERGY SECURITY; PLANNING; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATER POLLUTION;

CARBON CAPTURE AND SEQUESTRATIONS; CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION; CLIMATE SCENARIOS; FOOD AVAILABILITY; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELS; LOCAL AIR POLLUTIONS; MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVES; TECHNOLOGICAL RISK;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INTEGRATED APPROACH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 84994508584     PISSN: 17489318     EISSN: 17489326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/104010     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. IPPC 2014 Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability IPCC Working Group II Contribution to AR5 (http://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/)
2. World Bank 2012 Turn Down the Heat: Why a 4 °C Warmer World Must be Avoided (http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/11/17097815/turn-down-heat-4%C2%B0c-warmer-world-must-avoided)
3. UNFCCC 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf) - ref-separator -
4. IPCC 2013 Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers (Internet) (cited 19 Feb 2014) (https://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1)
5. IPCC 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change IPCC Working Group III Contribution to AR5 (https://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/)
6. Lotze-Campen H et al 2014 Impacts of increased bioenergy demand on global food markets: an AgMIP economic model intercomparison Agricul. Econ. 45 103-16
7. UNFCCC 2015 Paris Agreement (http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf)
8. Hejazi M I et al 2013 Integrated assessment of global water scarcity over the 21st century: II. Climate change mitigation policies Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 10 3383-425
9. Biewald A, Kowarsch M, Lotze-Campen H and Gerten D 2015 Ethical aspects in the economic modeling of water policy options Glob. Environ. Change 30 80-91
10. McCollum D L et al 2013 Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges Clim. Change 119 479-94
11. Stechow C et al 2016 2 °C and SDGs: united they stand, divided they fall? Environ. Res. Lett. 11 34022
12. Jakob M and Steckel J C 2014 How climate change mitigation could harm development in poor countries: how climate change mitigation could harm Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. 5 161-8
13. Ramana M V 2009 Nuclear power: economic, safety, health, and environmental issues of near-term technologies Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34 127-52
14. Wise M et al 2009 Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy Science 324 1183-6
15. Haberl H, Erb K-H, Krausmann F, Running S, Searchinger T D and Kolby Smith W 2013 Bioenergy: how much can we expect for 2050? Environ. Res. Lett. 8 31004
16. Schueler V, Fuss S, Steckel J C, Weddige U and Beringer T 2016 Productivity ranges of sustainable biomass potentials from non-agricultural land Environ. Res. Lett. 11 74026
17. Erb K-H, Haberl H and Plutzar C 2012 Dependency of global primary bioenergy crop potentials in 2050 on food systems, yields, biodiversity conservation and political stability Energy Policy 47 260-9
18. Arnell N W, Vuuren D P and van, Isaac M 2011 The implications of climate policy for the impacts of climate change on global water resources Glob. Environ. Change 21 592-603
19. Edenhofer O, Flachsland C, Jakob M and Lessmann K 2013 The Atmosphere as a Global Commons - Challenges for International Cooperation and Governance (Internet) Discussion paper 13-58. Harvard Project on Climate Agreements (http://belfercenter. hks. harvard. edu/publication/23364) (http://belfercenter.hks.harvard.edu/files/hpcadp58-edenhofer-flachsland-jakob-lessmann.pdf) (Accessed: 18 February 2014)
20. Luderer G, Pietzcker R C, Bertram C, Kriegler E, Meinshausen M and Edenhofer O 2013 Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets Environ. Res. Lett. 8 034033
21. Nemet G F, Holloway T and Meier P 2010 Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking Environ. Res. Lett. 5 14007
22. Dubash N K 2013 The politics of climate change in India: narratives of equity and cobenefits Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. 4 191-201
23. Zimmer A, Jakob M and Steckel J C 2015 What motivates Vietnam to strive for a low-carbon economy? - On the drivers of climate policy in a developing country Energy Sustainable Dev. 24 19-32
24. Stechow C et al 2015 Integrating global climate change mitigation goals with other sustainability objectives: a synthesis Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 40 363-94
25. Hallegatte S et al 2016 Mapping the climate change challenge Nat. Clim. Change 6 663-8
26. Griggs D et al 2013 Policy: sustainable development goals for people and planet Nature 495 305-7
27. IIASA 2015 AR5 Database (https://secure.iiasa.ac.at/web-apps/ene/AR5DB/dsd?Action=htmlpage&page=welcome)
28. Piontek F et al 2014 Multisectoral climate impact hotspots in a warming world Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111 3233-8
29. IIASA 2015 AMPERE Database (https://secure.iiasa.ac.at/web-apps/ene/AMPEREDB/dsd?Action=htmlpage&page=about)
30. Jaeger C C and Jaeger J 2010 Three views of two degrees Reg. Environ. Change 11 15-26
31. Rockstrom J et al 2009 A safe operating space for humanity Nature 461 472-5
32. Drèze J and Sen A 1989 Hunger and Public Action (Oxford : Oxford University Press)
33. d'Amour C B, Wenz L, Kalkuhl M, Steckel J C and Creutzig F 2016 Teleconnected food supply shocks Environ. Res. Lett. 11 35007
34. Wittneben B B F 2012 The impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on European energy policy Environ. Sci. Policy 15 1-3
35. Socolow R H and Glaser A 2009 Balancing risks: nuclear energy & climate change Daedalus 138 31-44
36. Jakob M and Edenhofer O 2014 Green growth, degrowth, and the commons Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 30
37. Luderer G et al 2011 The economics of decarbonizing the energy system - results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison Clim. Change 114 9-37
38. Popp A et al 2013 Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options Clim. Change 123 495-509
39. Rosenzweig C et al 2014 Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111 3268-73
40. Villoria N B, Elliott J, Müller C, Shin J, Zhao L and Song C 2016 Rapid aggregation of global gridded crop model outputs to facilitate cross-disciplinary analysis of climate change impacts in agriculture Environ. Model. Softw. 75 193-201
41. Fleurbaey M and Gaulier G 2009 International comparisons of living standards by equivalent incomes∗ Scand. J. Econ. 111 597-624
42. Bateman I J and Willis K G (ed) 2001 Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries (Internet) (Oxford : Oxford University Press) (OUP Catalogue) (https://ideas.repec.org/b/oxp/obooks/9780199248919.html)
43. Jun E, Kim W J, Jeong Y H and Chang S H 2010 Measuring the social value of nuclear energy using contingent valuation methodology Energy Policy 38 1470-6
44. Sun C and Zhu X 2014 Evaluating the public perceptions of nuclear power in China: evidence from a contingent valuation survey Energy Policy 69 397-405
45. Diamond P A and Hausman J A 1994 Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? J. Econ. Perspect. 8 45-64
46. Roe B, Teisl M F, Levy A and Russell M 2001 {US} consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity Energy Policy 29 917-25
47. Bechtel M M and Scheve K F 2013 Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110 13763-8
48. Schmid E and Knopf B 2012 Ambitious mitigation scenarios for Germany: a participatory approach Energy Policy 51 662-72