Nuclear power: Economic, safety, health, and environmental issues of near-term technologies

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volumn 34, Issue , 2009, Pages 127-152

  Ramana, M V ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accidents; Climate change; Costs; Waste

Indexed keywords

CAPITAL COSTS; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES; NUCLEAR POWER; NUCLEAR WASTE; REACTOR DESIGNS;

NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR REACTOR ACCIDENTS; RADIOACTIVE WASTES;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 72949096993     PISSN: 15435938     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.environ.033108.092057     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Deutch J, Moniz EJ, Ansolabehere S, Driscoll M, Gray PE, et al. 2003. The future of nuclear power: an interdisciplinary MIT study. Rep. 0615124208, Mass. Inst. Technol., Cambridge, MA
2. Tolley GS, Jones DW. 2004. The Economic Future of Nuclear Power. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago
3. Charpin J-M, Dessus B, Pellat R. 2000. Economic Forecast Study of the Nuclear Power Option. Paris: Off. Prime Minist. France
4. Sustain. Dev. Comm. (SDC). 2006. The role of nuclear power in a low carbon economy. Position Pap., UK SDC, London
5. UK Dep. Trade Ind. 2007. The Future of Nuclear Power. London: UK Dep. Trade Ind.
6. US Congr. Budg. Off. 2008. Nuclear Power's Role in Generating Electricity.Washington, DC: US Congr. Budg. Off.
7. World Nucl. Assoc. 2005. The New Economics of Nuclear Power. London:World Nucl. Assoc.
8. Int. At. Energy Agency (IAEA). 2008. Energy, Electricity and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2030. Vienna: IAEA
9. Smith B. 2006. Insurmountable Risks: The Dangers of Using Nuclear Power to Combat Global Climate Change. Takoma Park, MD: IEER Press
10. Gronlund L, Lochbaum D, Lyman E. 2007. Nuclear Power in a Warming World: Assessing the Risks, Addressing the Challenges. Cambridge, MA: Union Concerned Sci.
11. Int. Energy Agency (IEA). 2001. Nuclear Power in the OECD. Paris: IEA
12. Int. Energy Agency (IEA). 2006. World Energy Outlook 2006. Paris: IEA
13. Int. At. Energy Agency (IAEA). 2008. Nuclear Power Reactors in the World. Vienna: IAEA
14. Int. At. Energy Agency (IAEA). 2009. Factsheets & FAQs: advanced reactors. http://www.iaea.org/ Publications/Factsheets/English/advrea.html
15. Cowan R. 1990. Nuclear power reactors: a study in technological lock-in. J. Econ. Hist. 50:541-567
16. Thomas S. 2005. The Economics of Nuclear Power. Berlin, Ger.: Heinrich Böll Found.
17. Abram T, Ion S. 2008. Generation-IV nuclear power: a review of the state of the science. Energy Policy 36:4323-4330
18. Bhardwaj SA. 2006. The future 700 MWe pressurized heavy water reactor. Nucl. Eng. Des. 236:861-871
19. Int. At. Energy Agency (IAEA). 2009. Factsheets & FAQs: some examples of advanced LWR designs. http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Factsheets/English/ lwrdesig.html
20. Energy Inf. Adm. (EIA). 2006. New commercial reactor designs. http://www.eia.doe.gov/ cneaf/nuclear/page/analysis/nucenviss2.html
21. Sinha RK, Kakodkar A. 2006. Design and development of the AHWR-the Indian thorium fuelled innovative nuclear reactor. Nucl. Eng. Des. 236:683-700
22. Gagarinski AY, Ignatiev VV, Novikov VM, Subbotin SA. 1992. Advanced light-water reactor: Russian approaches. IAEA Bull. 34:37-40
23. Int. Panel Fissile Mater. (IPFM). 2007. Global Fissile Material Report 2007. Princeton, NJ: IPFM
24. Int. At. Energy Agency (IAEA). 2007. Energy, Electricity and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2030. Vienna: IAEA
25. Energy Inf. Adm. (EIA). 2008. Annual Energy Outlook 2008, With Projections to 2030. Washington, DC: EIA, US Dep. Energy
26. Nucl. Energy Agency (NEA). 2005. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity: Update 2005. Paris: NEA, OECD
27. Kammen DM, Pacca S. 2004. Assessing the costs of electricity. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 29:301-344
28. Kazimi MS, Todreas NE. 1999. Nuclear power economic performance: challenges and opportunities. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 24:140-171
29. Harding J. 2007. Economics of nuclear power and proliferation risks in a carbon-constrained world. Electr. J. 20:65-76
30. Bohra SA, Sharma PD. 2006. Construction management of Indian pressurized heavy water reactors. Nucl. Eng. Des. 236:836-851
31. Nucl. Energy Agency (NEA). 1998. Projected Costs of Generating Electricity: Update 1998. Paris: NEA, OECD
32. Mackerron G. 1992. Nuclear costs: Why do they keep rising? Energy Policy 20:641-652
33. Keystone. 2007. Nuclear Power Joint Fact-Finding. Keystone, CO: Keystone Cent.
34. Ayres M, MacRae M, Stogran M. 2004. Levelised Unit Electricity Cost Comparison of Alternate Technologies for Baseload Generation in Ontario, Can. Energy Res. Inst., prepared for Can. Nucl. Assoc., Calgary, Alta.
35. 2008. Nuclear renaissance: U. S. A: Coping with the new NPP sticker shock. NUKEM Mark. Rep. Apr.: 1-43
36. Wald ML. 2007. Costs surge for building power plants. N. Y. Times, July 10. http://www.nytimes. com/2007/07/10/business/worldbusiness/10energy.html
37. Brattle Group. 2007. Rising Utility Construction Costs: Sources and Impacts,Washington, DC: Brattle Group, prepared for the Edison Found.
38. 2006. Credit aspects of North American and European nuclear power. Standard & Poor's. Jan. 9
39. Hempstead J. 2008. New nuclear generating capacity: potential credit implications for U.S. investor owned utilities. Moody's Corp. Finance, Rep. 109152. May:1-20. http://massimobray. italianieuropei.it/ 080527MoodysNewNukeGenCapacity.pdf
40. Thomas S. 2008. The Credit Crunch and Nuclear Power.Washington, DC:Nonprolif. Policy Educ. Cent.
41. Koomey JG, Hultman NE. 2007. A reactor-level analysis of busbar costs for US nuclear plants, 1970-2005. Energy Policy 35:5630-5642
42. Hultman NE, Koomey JG. 2007. The risk of surprise in energy technology costs. Environ. Res. Lett. 2:1-6
43. Wallace E, Matzie R, Heiderd R, Maddalena J. 2006. From field to factory-Taking advantage of shop manufacturing for the pebble bed modular reactor. Nucl. Eng. Des. 236:445-453
44. Carelli MD, Petrovic B, Mycoff CW, Trucco P, Ricotti ME, Locatelli G. 2007. Economic comparison of different size nuclear reactors. Presented at 2007 Int. Joint Meet. Lat. Am. Sect. Am. Nucl. Soc., Cancun
45. Marshall JM, Navarro P. 1991. Costs of nuclear power plant construction: theory and new evidence. RAND J. Econ. 22:148-154
46. Ramana MV, D'Sa A, Reddy AKN. 2005. Economics of nuclear power from heavy water reactors. Econ. Pol. Weekly XL(17):1763-1773
47. Adams R. 1996. Economy of scale? Is bigger better? At. Insights 2. http://www. atomicinsights.com/may96/Big machines.html
48. McDonald A, Schrattenholzer L. 2001. Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29:255-261
49. Cantor R, Hewlett J. 1988. The economics of nuclear power: further evidence on learning, economies of scale, and regulatory effects. Resour. Energy 10:315-335
50. Thomas S, Bradford P, Froggatt A, Milborrow D. 2007. The Economics of Nuclear Power. Amsterdam: Greenpeace Int.
51. Howarth R, Norgaard R. 1993. Intergenerational transfers and the social discount rate. Environ. Resour. Econ. 3:337-358
52. Lev B. 1974. On the association between operating leverage and risk. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 9:627-641
53. Farber S. 1991. Nuclear power, systematic risk, and the cost of capital. Contemp. Econ. Policy 9:73-82
54. Wald M. 2005. Interest in building reactors, but industry is still cautious. N. Y. Times, May 2: p. 19
55. Hill J, Schneeweis T. 1983. The effect of Three Mile Island on electric utility stock prices: a note. J. Financ. 38:1285-1292
56. Kalra R, Henderson GV Jr, Raines GA. 1993. Effects of the Chernobyl nuclear accident on utility share prices. Q. J. Bus. Econ. 32:52-77
57. World Nucl. Assoc. (WNA). 2008. The Economics of Nuclear Power. London: WNA
58. Nucl. Energy Agency (NEA). 2003. Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants: Policies, Strategies and Costs. Paris: NEA, OECD
59. Nucl. Decomm. Auth./UKAEA. 2007. Dounreay site summary. http://www.nda.gov.uk/documents/ loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/getfile. cfm&pageid=3962
60. Macfarlane A. 2001. Interim storage of spent fuel in the United States. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 26:201-235
61. Ramana MV, Suchitra JY. 2007. Costing plutonium: economics of reprocessing in India. Int. J. Glob. Energy Issues 27:454-471
62. Nucl. Energy Agency (NEA). 1994. The Economics of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle. Paris: NEA, OECD
63. Natl. Res. Counc. 1996. NuclearWastes: Technologies for Separations and Transmutation.Washington, DC: Natl. Acad.
64. Bunn M, Holdren JP, Fetter S, Zwaan BVD. 2005. The economics of reprocessing versus direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Nucl. Technol. 150:209-230
65. Ramana MV, Suchitra JY. 2009. The many phases of nuclear insecurity. In India's Energy Security, ed. L Noronha, A Sudarshan, pp. 207-222 New York: Routledge
66. Joint Waste Owners. 2004. Costs of Alternative Approaches for the Long-Term Management of Canada's Nuclear Fuel Waste: Deep Geologic Disposal Approach, Ontario Power Generation, Hydro Quebec, New Brunswick Power, At. Energy Can.
67. Kastchiev G, Kromp W, Kurth S, Lochbaum D, Lyman E, et al. 2007. Residual Risk: An Account of Events in Nuclear Power Plants Since the Chernobyl Accident in 1986. Brussels: Greens/Eur. Free Alliance
68. Nucl. Energy Agency (NEA). 2006. Nuclear Power Plant Operating Experiences from the IAEA/NEA Incident Reporting System: 2002-2005. Paris: NEA, OECD
69. Mynatt FR. 1982. Nuclear reactor safety research since Three Mile Island. Science 216:131-135
70. Martensson A. 1992. Inherently safe reactors. Energy Policy 20:660-671
71. Forsberg CW,Weinberg AM. 1990. Advanced reactors, passive safety, and acceptance of nuclear energy. Annu. Rev. Energy 15:133-152
72. Lyman ES. 2001. The pebble-bed modular reactor (PBMR): safety issues. Forum Phys. Soc. 30:16-19
73. Int. At. Energy Agency (IAEA). 1991. Safety related terms for advanced nuclear plants, IAEA-TECDOC-626, Int. At. Energy Agency, Vienna
74. Lidsky LM. 1988. Nuclear power: levels of safety. Radiat. Res. 113:217-226
75. US Nucl. Regul. Comm. 1975. Reactor Safety Study: an assessment of accident risks in U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. Rep.WASH-1400 (NUREG-75/014), US Nucl. Regul. Comm.,Washington, DC
76. Lewis HW, Budnitz RJ, Kouts HJC, Loewenstein WB, Rowe WD, et al. 1978. Risk Assessment Review Group report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Rep. NUREG/CR-0400, US Nucl. Regul. Comm.,Washington, DC
77. Keller W, Modarres M. 2005. A historical overview of probabilistic risk assessment development and its use in the nuclear power industry: a tribute to the late Professor Norman Carl Rasmussen. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 89:271-285
78. Leveson N. 2004. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf. Sci. 42:237-270
79. Marais K, Dulac N, Leveson N. 2004. Beyond normal accidents and high reliability organizations: the need for an alternative approach to safety in complex systems. Presented at MIT Eng. Syst. Symp. Mar. 29-31. Cambridge, MA
80. Comm. Saf. Nucl. Inst. 1986. A critical review of analytical techniques for risk studies in nuclear power stations. Rep. 123, Comm. Saf. Nucl. Inst., Nucl. Energy Agency, OECD, Paris
81. Nucl. Regul. Comm. (NRC). 1990. Severe accident risks: an assessment for five U.S. nuclear power plants. Rep. NUREG-1150, US Nucl. Regul. Comm.,Washington, DC
82. Gertman DI, Hallbert BP, Parrish MW, Sattision MB, Brownson D, Tortorelli JP. 2001. Review of findings for human error contribution to risk in operating events. Rep. NUREG/CR-6753, Idaho Natl. Eng. Environ. Lab./US Nucl. Regul. Comm.,Washington, DC
83. Simola K. 2002. Advances in operational safety and severe accident research. Rep. NKS-61,Nordic Nucl. Saf. Res., Roskilde, Den.
84. Perrow C. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books
85. Sagan S. 2004. Learning from normal accidents. Organ. Environ. 17:15-19
86. Sagan S. 1993. The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents and Nuclear Weapons. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
87. Sagan S. 2004. The problem of redundancy problem: why more nuclear security forces may produce less nuclear security. Risk Anal. 24:936-946
88. Miller DW. 1999. Sociology, not engineering, may explain our vulnerability to technological disaster. Chron. High. Educ. 15:A19-20
89. Wolf FG. 2001. Operationalizing and testing normal accident theory in petrochemical plants and refineries. Prod. Oper. Manag. 10:292-305
90. Sammarco JJ. 2005. Operationalizing normal accident theory for safety-related computer systems. Saf. Sci. 43(9):697-714
91. CumminsWE,CorlettiMM,Schulz TL. 2003.Westinghouse AP1000 advanced passive plant. Presented at Int. Congr. Adv. Nucl. Power Plants 2003. Ć ordoba, Spain
92. Pidgeon NF. 1991. Safety culture and risk management in organizations. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 22:129-140
93. Zhang H, Wiegmann DA, Thaden TLV, Sharma G, Mitchell AA. 2002. Safety culture: a concept in chaos? Proc. 46th Annu. Meet. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Santa Monica, CA: Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc.
94. Choudhry RM, Fang D, Mohamed S. 2007. The nature of safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art. Saf. Sci. 45:993-1012
95. Int. Nucl. Saf. Advis. Group (INSAG). 1999. Basic safety principles for nuclear power plants: 75-INSAG- 3 rev. 1. Rep. INSAG-12, Int. Nucl. Saf. Advis. Group, Int. At. Energy Agency, Vienna
96. Meshkati N. 1991. Human factors in large-scale technological systems accidents: Three Mile Island, Bhopal, Chernobyl. Ind. Crisis Q. 5:131-154
97. Comm. Hum. Factors. 1988. Human Factors Research and Nuclear Safety. Washington, DC: Natl. Res. Counc., Natl. Acad.
98. Roberts KH, Rousseau DM. 1989. Research in nearly failure-free, high-reliability organizations: having the bubble. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 36:132-139
99. Schulman PR. 1993. The negotiated order of organizational reliability. Adm. Soc. 25:353-372
100. La Porte TR. 1996. High reliability organizations: unlikely, demanding and at risk. J. Conting. Crisis Manag. 4:60-71
101. Bigley GA, Roberts KH. 2001. The incident command system: high reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Manag. J. 44:1281-1300
102. La Porte TR, Rochlin G. 1994. A rejoinder to Perrow. J. Conting. Crisis Manag. 2:221-227
103. Barkenbus JN, Forsberg C. 1995. Internationalizing nuclear safety: the pursuit of collective responsibility. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 20:179-212
104. Rasmussen J. 1997. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 27:183-213
105. Pigford TH. 1974. Environmental aspects of nuclear energy production. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 24:515-559
106. Budnitz RJ, Holdren JP. 1976. Social and environmental costs of energy systems. Annu. Rev. Energy 1:553-580
107. Glasstone S, Jordan WH. 1980. Nuclear Power and Its Environmental Effects. La Grange Park, IL: Am. Nucl. Soc. 395 pp.
108. Beck HL,Miller KM. 1980. Some radiological aspects of coal combustion. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 27:689-694
109. UN Sci. Comm. Effects At. Radiat. (UNSCEAR). 1993. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR 1993 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. New York: UN Sci. Comm. Effects At. Radiat. 922 pp.
110. Ball DJ. 1993. Comparative health risks of electricity generating systems. Sci. Meas. Technol. IEE Proc. A 140:81-85
111. Joyce MJ, Port SN. 1999. Environmental impact of the nuclear fuel cycle. In Environmental Impact of Power Generation, ed. RE Hester, RM Harrison, pp. 73-96. Cambridge, UK: R. Soc. Chem.
112. UN Sci. Comm. Effects At. Radiat. (UNSCEAR). 2000. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. New York: UN Sci. Comm. Effects At. Radiat. 566 pp.
113. Williams D. 2001. Lessons from Chernobyl. Br. Med. J. 323:643-644
114. Nucl. Energy Agency (NEA). 2002. Chernobyl: Assessment of Radiological and Health Impacts (2002 Update of Chernobyl: Ten Years On). Paris: NEA, OECD
115. Williams D. 2002. Cancer after nuclear fallout: lessons from the Chernobyl accident. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2:543-549
116. Chernobyl Forum. 2005. Chernobyl's Legacy: Health, Environmental and Socio-economic Impacts and Recommendations to the Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Vienna: Int. At. Energy Agency
117. Bennett B, Repacholi M, Carr Z. 2006. Health effects of the Chernobyl accident and special health care programmes: report of the UN Chernobyl forum expert group 'health.'World Health Organ., Geneva
118. Cardis EKD, Boniol M, Drozdovitch V, Darby SC, Gilbert ES, et al. 2006. Estimates of the cancer burden in Europe from radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl accident. Int. J. Cancer 119:1224-1235
119. Ivanov VK. 2007. Late cancer and noncancer risks among Chernobyl emergency workers of Russia. Health Phys. 93:470-479
120. Abramenko IBN, Chumak A, Davidova E, Kryachok I, Martina Z, et al. 2008. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients exposed to ionizing radiation due to the Chernobyl NPP accident-with focus on immunoglobulin heavy chain gene analysis. Leuk. Res. 32:535-545
121. Noshchenko AG, Moysich KB, Bondar A, Zamostyan PV, Drosdova VD, Michalek AM. 2001. Patterns of acute leukaemia occurrence among children in the Chernobyl region. Int. J. Epidemiol. 30:125-129
122. Williams D, Baverstock K. 2006. Too soon for a final diagnosis. Nature 440:993-994
123. Forum Chernobyl. 2005. Environmental Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident and Their Remediation: Twenty Years of Experience. Vienna: Int. At. Energy Agency
124. Peplow M. 2006. Counting the dead. Nature 440:982-983
125. Natl. Res. Counc. 2006. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII, Phase 2. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad.
126. Baker PJ, Hoel D. 2007. Meta-analysis of standardized incidence and mortality rates of childhood leukaemia in proximity to nuclear facilities. Eur. J. Cancer Care 16:355-363
127. Spix C, Schmiedel S, Kaatsch P, Schulze-Rath R, Blettner M. 2008. Case-control study on childhood cancer in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Germany 1980-2003. Eur. J. Cancer 44:275-284
128. Nucl. Energy Agency (NEA). 2008. Moving Forward with Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste. Paris: NEA, OECD
129. Holdren JP. 1992. Radioactive-waste management in the United States: evolving policy prospects and dilemmas. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 17:235-259
130. Flynn J, Slovic P. 1995. Yucca Mountain: a crisis for policy: prospects for America' s high-level nuclear waste program. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 20:83-118
131. Ewing RC, Macfarlane A. 2002. Yucca Mountain. Science 296:659-660
132. Von Hippel F. 2007. Managing Spent Fuel in the United States: The Illogic of Reprocessing. Princeton, NJ: Int. Panel Fissile Mater.
133. Alvarez R. 2007. Radioactive Wastes and the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership. Washington, DC: Inst. Policy Stud./Friends Earth USA/Gov. Account. Proj.
134. Natl. Res. Counc. 2008. Review of DOE's Nuclear Energy Research and Development Program.Washington, DC: Natl. Acad.
135. Kraft ME. 2000. Policy design and the acceptability of environmental risks: nuclear waste disposal in Canada and the United States. Policy Stud. J. 28:206-218
136. Nucl. Waste Manag. Organ. (NWMO). 2005. Adaptive phased management: questions and answers. NWMO News, Oct. Vol.3.2
137. Gowda MVR, Easterling D. 1998. Nuclear waste and native America: the MRS siting exercise. Risk: Health Saf. Environ. 9:229-258
138. Sailor WC, Bodansky D, Braun C, Fetter S, Zwaan BVD. 2000. A nuclear solution to climate change? Science 288:1177-1178
139. Van Der Zwaan B. 2002. Nuclear energy: tenfold expansion or phase-out? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 69:287-307
140. Schneider E, Sailor WC. 2006. Nuclear fission. Sci. Glob. Secur. 14:183-211
141. Pacala S, Socolow R. 2004. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968-972
142. Keepin B, Kats G. 1988. Greenhouse warming: comparative analysis of nuclear and efficiency abatement strategies. Energy Policy 16:536-561
143. Byrne J, Wang Y-D, Alleng G, Glover L, Innis V, Mun Y-M. 2000. Ecological justice in the greenhouse. http://ceep.udel.edu/publications/ globalenvironments/publications/2000 ge cop6 ecological justice greenhouse %20position paper.pdf
144. Mitchell C, Woodman B. 2006. New nuclear power: implications for a sustainable energy system. Rep. ISBN 0954975766, Green Alliance, London
145. Sovacool BK. 2008. Valuing the greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power: a critical survey. Energy Policy 36:2950-2963
146. Fthenakis VM, Kim HC. 2007. Greenhouse-gas emissions from solar electric-and nuclear power: a life-cycle study. Energy Policy 35:2549-2557
147. Jacobson MZ. 2009. Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security. Energy Environ. Sci. 2:148-173