Information and communication technologies and public participation: interactive maps and value added for citizens

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 153-166

  Gagliardi, Dimitri ^a   Schina, Laura ^b   Sarcinella, Marco Lucio ^b   Mangialardi, Giovanna ^b   Niglia, Francesco ^c   Corallo, Angelo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO   (Italy)

^c KoysLab Knowledge for Simplification   (Italy)

Author keywords

Citizens participation; E government; Interactive city maps; Open data; Open government; Open innovation; Smart City

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994504496     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Albino, V., Berardi, U., Dangelico, R., Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology 22:1 (2015), 3–21.
2. Alexopoulos, C., Zuiderwijk, A., Charapabidis, Y., Loukis, E., Janssen, M., Designing a second generation of open data platforms: integrating open data and social media. Electronic Government, 2014, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 230–241.
3. Alford, J., Engaging public sector clients. From service delivery to co-production. 2009, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Hamps and New York, NY.
4. Appadurai, A., Holston, J., Cities and citizenship. Public Culture 8:2 (1996), 187–204.
5. Aurenhammer, F., Voronoi diagrams - A survey of a fundamental geometric data structure. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 23 (1991), 345–405.
6. Batty, M., Cities and complexity: Understanding cities through cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. 2005, The MIT Press.
7. Batty, M., The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319:5864 (2008), 769–771.
8. Batty, M., Cities as complex systems: Scaling, interaction, networks, dynamics and urban morphologies. Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science, 2009, Springer, New York, 1041–1071.
9. Batty, M., Cities in disequilibrium. Working paper of UCL Centre for Advances Spatial Analysis. https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/casa/pdf/Working_Paper_202.pdf, 2015.
10. Batty, M., Longley, P., Fractal cities: A geometry of form and function. 1994, Academic Press.
11. Bettencourt, L.M., The origins of scaling in cities. Science 340:6139 (2013), 1438–1441.
12. Bettencourt, L.M., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C., West, G.B., Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:17 (2007), 7301–7306.
13. Bie, J., Bijlsma, M., Broll, G., Cao, H., Hjalmarsson, A., Hodgson, F., Kusumastuti, D., Move better with tripzoom. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, 4(3/4), 2012.
14. Blumenfeld, H., Theory of city form, past and present. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 8:3/4 (1949), 7–16.
15. Calabrese, F., Colonna, M., Lovisolo, P., Parata, D., Ratti, C., Real-time urban monitoring using cell phones: A case study in Rome. Intelligent Transportation Systems 12:1 (2011), 141–151.
16. Chesbrough, H., Open innovation. 2003, Harvard Business School, Boston.
17. Chesbrough, H., Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, 2006, 1–12.
18. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Scholl, H.J., Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2012, 2289–2297.
19. Conradie, P., Choenni, S., On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Government Information Quarterly 31 (2014), S10–S17.
20. Curwell, S., Deakin, M., Cooper, I., Paskaleva-Shapira, K., Ravetz, J., Babicki, D., Citizens' expectations of information cities: Implications for urban planning and design. Building Research and Information 33:1 (2005), 55–66.
21. Depuru, S.S.S.R., Wang, L., Devabhaktuni, V., Smart meters for power grid: Challenges, issues, advantages and status. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15:6 (2011), 2736–2742.
22. di Milano, C., PGT Piano di Governo del Territorio piano dei servizi - Allegato 3 - Le 88 schede NIL. Piano dei Servizi vigente., 2014 Available at: http://download.comune.milano.it/26_06_2015/Le%2088%20Schede%20NIL_22%20dicembre%202,014%20(1435301392130).pdf.
23. Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., Chesbrough, H., Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management 39:4 (2009), 311–316.
24. Errichiello, L., Marasco, A., Open service innovation in smart cities: A framework for exploring innovation networks in the development of new city services. Advanced Engineering Forum 11 (2014), 115–124.
25. Erzsébet, R., Barabási, A.-L., Hierarchical organization in complex networks. Physical Review E, 67, 2003.
26. Gabrys, J., Programming environments: environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32:1 (2014), 30–48.
27. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., Meijers, E., Smart cities-Ranking of European medium-sized cities. 2007, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna.
28. Hancke, G.P., De Carvalho e Silva, B., Hancke, G.P. Jr., The role of advanced sensing in smart cities. Sensors 13 (2013), 393–425.
29. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S., Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28:1 (2004), 75–105.
30. Hickley, M., The grounds for citizen engagement and the roles of planners. 2003, VDM, Saarbruecken.
31. Hilger, D., Piller, F.T., A government 2.0 fosteringpublic sector rethinking by open innovation. Innovation management. http://www.InnovationManagement.se, 2011.
32. Hilgers, D., Ihl, C., Citizensourcing: Applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. The International Journal of Public Participation 4:1 (2010), 67–88.
33. Hollands, R.G., Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?. City 12:3 (2008), 303–320.
34. Hudson-Smith, A., Tracking, tagging and scanning the city. Architectural Design 84:1 (2014), 40–47.
35. Janowski, T., Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly 32:3 (2015), 221–236.
36. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A., Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management 29:4 (2012), 258–268.
37. Komninos, N., Intelligent cities: Innovation, knowledge systems, and digital spaces. 2002, Taylor & Francis.
38. Komninos, N., The architecture of intelligent cities: Integrating human, collective and artificial intelligence to enhance knowledge and innovation. Intelligent Environments, 2006. IE 06. 2nd IET International Conference on, 1, 2006, 13–20 (IET).
39. Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., Smart cities in the innovation age. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 25:2 (2012), 93–95.
40. Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., Arribas, D., Smart cities in perspective–a comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps. Innovation: The European journal of social science research 25:2 (2012), 229–246.
41. Koussouris, S., Lampathaki, F., Kokkinakos, P., Askounis, D., Misuraca, G., 4). Accelerating Policy Making 2.0: Innovation directions and research perspectives as distilled from four standout cases. Government Information Quarterly 32:2 (2015), 142–153.
42. Laursen, K., Salter, A.J., The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy 43:5 (2014), 867–878.
43. Lee, G., Kwak, Y.H., An open government maurity model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly 29:4 (2012), 492–503.
44. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., Yousef, W., Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 25:2 (2012), 137–149.
45. Lukensmeyer, C.J., Torres, L.H., Citizensourcing: Citizen participation in a networked nation. Yang, K., Bergrud, E., (eds.) Civic engagement in a network society, 2008, Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, North Carolina, 207–233.
46. Lüthje, C., Herstatt, C., von Hippel, E., User innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy 34:6 (2005), 951–965.
47. Lynch, K., The pattern of the metropolis. Daedalus 90:1 (1961), 79–98.
48. Mahrer, H., Krimmer, R., Towards the enhancement of e-democracy: Identifying the notion of the ‘middleman paradox’. Information Systems Journal 15:1 (2005), 27–42.
49. McGuire, M., Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review 66:1 (2006), 33–43.
50. Misuraca, G., Mureddu, F., Osimo, D., Policy-making 2.0: Unleashing the power of big data for public governance. Open government, 2014, Springer, New York, 171–188.
51. Nam, T., Pardo, T.A., Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 2011, June, 282–291 (ACM).
52. Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A.C., Mangano, G., Scorrano, F., Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities 38 (2014), 25–36.
53. Newman, M., Barabási, A.-L., Watts, D., The structure and dynamics of networks. 2005, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
54. Niglia, F., Schina, L., Building user-centricity within the NET-EUCEN network. In eChallenges e-2011 Conference Proceedings, Paul Cunningham and Miriam Cunningham, 2011, IIMC International Information Management Corporation Ltd (2011).
55. Noveck, B.S., Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. 2009, Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C.
56. Obama, B., Memorandum on transparency and open government. OGD, Executive Office of the President of United States of America, Washington, DC, 2009 Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10–06. pdf.
57. OECD, Promise and problems of e-democracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement. 2004, OECD Publications, Paris.
58. OECD, Rethinking e-government services: User-centred approaches. 2009, OECD Publications, Paris.
59. Open Knowledge Foundation, What is open?. https://okfn.org/opendata, 2014.
60. Paskaleva, K.A., The smart city: A nexus for open innovation?. Intelligent Buildings International 3:3 (2011), 153–171.
61. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S., A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24:3 (2007), 45–77.
62. Pitt, J., Bourazeri, A., Nowak, A., Roszczynska-Kurasinska, M., Rychwalska, A., Santiago, I.R., Sanduleac, M., Transforming big data into collective awareness. Computer 46:6 (2013), 40–45.
63. Portugali, J., Self-Organization and the City. 2000, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
64. Poslad, S., Ma, A., Wang, Z., Mei, H., Using a smart city IoT to incentivise and target shifts in mobility behaviour—Is it a piece of pie?. Sensors 15:6 (2015), 13,069–13,096.
65. Runeson, P., Höst, M., Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering 14:2 (2009), 131–164.
66. Russi, N., La qualità della città esistente. Individuazione e progetto dei nuclei di identità di locale nel Pgt di Milano. De Carli, M., De Carli, M., Fiorese, G., Oliva, F., Solero, E., (eds.) Pgt di Milano. Rifare, conservare o correggere?, 2011, Maggioli editore, Santarcangelo di Romagna, RN, 79–90.
67. Schaffers, H., Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., Oliveira, A., Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. Future Internet Assembly 6656 (2011), 431–446.
68. Sieber, R., Johnson, P., Civic open data at a crossroads: Dominant models and current challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 2015, 308–315.
69. Suakanto, S., Supangkat, S.H., Saragih, R., Smart city dashboard for integrating various data of sensor networks. ICT for smart society (ICISS), 2013 international conference on, 2013, 1–5 (IEEE).
70. Tapscott, D., Williams, A.D., Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. 2006, Portfolio, United States of America.
71. Von Hippel, E., Democratizing innovation. Cambridge Mass. 2005.
72. West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H., Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy 43:5 (2014), 805–811.
73. Yigitcanlar, T., Smart cities: an effective urban development and management model?. Australian Planner 52:1 (2015), 27–34.
74. Yin, R.K., Case studies research: design and methods. 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
75. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., Alibaks, R.S., Sheikh Alibaks, R., Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electronic Journal of eGovernment 10:2 (2012), 156–172.