Reliability, validity, responsiveness, and minimal important change of the Disablities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Constant-Murley scores in patients with a humeral shaft fracture

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2017, Pages e1-e12

  Mahabier, Kiran C ^a   Den Hartog, Dennis ^a   Theyskens, Nina ^a   Verhofstad, Michael H J ^a   Van Lieshout, Esther M M ^a   Bos, P Koen ^a   Bronkhorst, Maarten W G A ^a,b   Bruijninckx, Milko M M ^a,c   De Haan, Jeroen ^a,b   Den Hoed, P Ted ^a,d   Eversdijk, Martin G ^a,e   Goslings, J Carel ^a,f   Haverlag, Robert ^a,g   Heetveld, Martin J ^a,h   Kerver, Albert J H ^a,b   Kolkman, Karel A ^a,b   Leenhouts, Peter A ^a,i   Meylaerts, Sven A G ^a,b   Onstenk, Ron ^a,j   Poeze, Martijn ^a,k   Poolman, Rudolf W ^a,g   Punt, Bas J ^a,l   Ritchie, Ewan D ^a,m   Roerdink, W Herbert ^a,n   Roukema, Gert R ^a,o   Sintenie, Jan Bernard ^a,p   Soesman, Nicolaj M R ^a,b   Van der Elst, Maarten ^a,q   Van der Heijden, Frank H W M ^a,r   Van der Linden, Frits M ^a,j   Van der Zwaal, Peer ^a,b   Van Dijk, Jan P ^a,s   Van Jonbergen, Hans Peter W ^a,n   Verleisdonk, Egbert J M M ^a,t   Vroemen, Jos P A M ^a,u   Waleboer, Marco ^a,v   Wittich, Philippe ^a,w   Zuidema, Wietse P ^a,x   more..

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MC Haaglanden Bronovo ^*  (Netherlands)

^c IJSSELLAND HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^d IKAZIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^e ST JANSDAL HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^f ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^h N   (Netherlands)

ⁱ ZAANS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^j GROENE HART HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^k MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^l ALBERT SCHWEITZER HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^m ALRIJNE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

ⁿ DEVENTER HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^o Albert Schweitzer Hospital ^*  (Netherlands)

^p ELKERLIEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^q REINIER DE GRAAF HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^r TweeSteden Hospital   (Netherlands)

^s GELDERSE VALLEI HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^t DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY   (Netherlands)

^u AMPHIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^v Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital   (Netherlands)

^w ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^x VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

Constant Murley; DASH; Humeral shaft fracture; measurement properties; patient reported outcome measure; reliability; responsiveness; validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONSTANT MURLEY (SCORE); CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; DISABILITIES OF THE ARM, SHOULDER AND HAND (SCORE); HUMAN; HUMERUS SHAFT FRACTURE; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PAIN; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANGE OF MOTION; RELIABILITY; SHORT FORM 36; VALIDITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPLICATION; CONVALESCENCE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMERAL FRACTURES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; UPPER LIMB;

ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; HUMERAL FRACTURES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84994430543     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: 15326500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.072     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. 1 Aaronson, N.K., Muller, M., Cohen, P.D.A., Essink-Bot, M.L., Fekkes, M., Sanderman, R., et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 51 (1998), 1055–1068.
2. 2 Aasheim, T., Finsen, V., The DASH and the QuickDASH instruments. Normative values in the general population in Norway. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 39 (2014), 140–144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753193413481302.
3. 3 Angst, F., Verra, M.L., Lehmann, S., Aeschlimann, A., Responsiveness of five condition-specific and generic outcome assessment instruments for chronic pain. BMC Med Res Methodol, 8, 2008, 26 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-26.
4. 4 Blonna, D., Scelsi, M., Marini, E., Bellato, E., Tellini, A., Rossi, R., et al. Can we improve the reliability of the Constant-Murley score?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21 (2012), 4–12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.014.
5. 5 Brunner, A., Thormann, S., Babst, R., Minimally invasive percutaneous plating of proximal humeral shaft fractures with the Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS). J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21 (2012), 1056–1063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.016.
6. 6 Cederlund, R.I., Ramel, E., Rosberg, H.E., Dahlin, L.B., Outcome and clinical changes in patients 3, 6, 12 months after a severe or major hand injury—can sense of coherence be an indicator for rehabilitation focus?. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 11, 2010, 286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-286.
7. 7 Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1977, Academic Press, New York, 474.
8. 8 Constant, C.R., Murley, A.H., A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214 (1987), 160–164.
9. 9 Davidson, M., Keating, J., Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): how should I interpret reports of measurement properties? A practical guide for clinicians and researchers who are not biostatisticians. Br J Sports Med 48 (2014), 792–796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091704.
10. 10 Dias, J.J., Rajan, R.A., Thompson, J.R., Which questionnaire is best? The reliability, validity and ease of use of the Patient Evaluation Measure, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Michigan Hand Outcome Measure. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 33 (2008), 9–17 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753193407087121.
11. 11 EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy (New York) 16 (1990), 199–208.
12. 12 Fan, Y., Li, Y.W., Zhang, H.B., Liu, J.F., Han, X.M., Chang, X., et al. Management of humeral shaft fractures with intramedullary interlocking nail versus locking compression plate. Orthopedics 38 (2015), e825–9 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20150902-62.
13. 13 Garratt, A.N., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., Fitzpatrick, R., Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ 324 (2002), 1417–1419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1417.
14. 14 Haldorsen, B., Svege, I., Roe, Y., Bergland, A., Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 15, 2014, 78 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-78.
15. 15 Henseler, J.F., Kolk, A., van der Zwaal, P., Nagels, J., Vliet Vlieland, T.P., Nelissen, R.G., The minimal detectable change of the Constant score in impingement, full-thickness tears, and massive rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24 (2015), 376–381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.07.003.
16. 16 Hudak, P.L., Amadio, P.C., Bombardier, C., Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29 (1996), 602–608.
17. 17 Ishikawa, H., Murasawa, A., Nakazono, K., Abe, A., Otani, H., Netsu, T., et al. The patient-based outcome of upper-extremity surgeries using the DASH questionnaire and the effect of disease activity of the patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 27 (2008), 967–973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-007-0830-8.
18. 18 Kennedy, C.A., Beaton, D.E., Solway, S., McConnell, S., Bombardier, C., Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). The DASH and quickDASH outcome measure user's manual. 2011, Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario.
19. 19 Kitis, A., Celik, E., Aslan, U.B., Zencir, M., DASH questionnaire for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms in industry workers: a validity and reliability study. Appl Ergon 40 (2009), 251–255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.04.005.
20. 20 Lee, J.Y., Lim, J.Y., Oh, J.H., Ko, Y.M., Cross-cultural adaptation and clinical evaluation of a Korean version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcome questionnaire (K-DASH). J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17 (2008), 570–574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.12.005.
21. 21 Li, Y., Wang, C., Wang, M., Huang, L., Huang, Q., Postoperative malrotation of humeral shaft fracture after plating compared with intramedullary nailing. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20 (2011), 947–954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.016.
22. 22 MacDermid, J.C., Drosdowech, D., Faber, K., Responsiveness of self-report scales in patients recovering from rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15 (2006), 407–414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.005.
23. 23 Mahabier, K.C., van Lieshout, E.M.M., Bolhuis, H.W., Bos, P.K., Bronkhorst, M.W.G.A., Bruijninckx, M.M.M., et al. HUMeral shaft fractures: MEasuring Recovery after operative versus non-operative treatment (HUMMER): a multicenter comparative observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 15, 2014, 39 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-39.
24. 24 McHorney, C.A., Tarlov, A.R., Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?. Qual Life Res 4 (1995), 293–307.
25. 25 Middel, B., van Sonderen, E., Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research. Int J Integr Care, 2, 2002, e15 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.65.
26. 26 Mückley, T., Diefenbeck, M., Sorkin, A.T., Beimel, C., Goebel, M., Buhren, V., Results of the T2 humeral nailing system with special focus on compression interlocking. Injury 39 (2008), 299–305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.08.031.
27. 27 Norman, R., Cronin, P., Viney, R., King, M., Street, D., Ratcliffe, J., International comparisons in valuing EQ-5D health states: a review and analysis. Value Health 12 (2009), 1194–1200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00581.x.
28. 28 Revicki, D., Hays, R.D., Cella, D., Sloan, J., Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 61 (2008), 102–109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012.
29. 29 Roy, J.S., MacDermid, J.C., Woodhouse, L.J., A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant-Murley score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19 (2010), 157–164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.008.
30. 30 Slobogean, G.P., Noonan, V.K., O'Brien, P.J., The reliability and validity of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, EuroQol-5D, Health Utilities Index, and Short Form-6D outcome instruments in patients with proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19 (2010), 342–348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.021.
31. 31 SooHoo, N.F., McDonald, A.P., Seiler, J.G., McGillivary, G.R., Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. J Hand Surg Am 27A (2002), 537–541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2002.32964.
32. 32 Terwee, C.B., Bot, S.D., de Boer, M.R., van der Windt, D.A., Knol, D.L., Dekker, J., et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60 (2007), 34–42 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
33. 33 Tsourvakas, S., Alexandropoulos, C., Papachristos, I., Tsakoumis, G., Ameridis, N., Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with antegrade intramedullary locking nail. Musculoskelet Surg 95 (2011), 193–198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12306-011-0126-7.
34. 34 Veehof, M.M., Sleegers, E.J., van Veldhoven, N.H., Schuurman, A.H., van Meeteren, N.L., Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther 15 (2002), 347–354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(02)80006-0.
35. 35 Wang, C., Li, J., Li, Y., Dai, G., Wang, M., Is minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fracture advantageous compared with the conventional open technique?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24 (2015), 1741–1748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.032.
36. 36 Ware, J.E. Jr, Sherbourne, C.D., The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 (1992), 473–483.
37. 37 Wewers, M.E., Lowe, N.K., A critical-review of visual analog scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 13 (1990), 227–236.
38. 38 Wylie, J.D., Beckmann, J.T., Granger, E., Tashjian, R.Z., Functional outcomes assessment in shoulder surgery. World J Orthop 5 (2014), 623–633 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.623.