Erratum: Emerging Evidence on the Effectiveness of Tropical Forest Conservation (PLOS ONE (2016) 11:11 (e0159152) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159152);Emerging evidence on the effectiveness of tropical forest conservation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 2016, Pages

  Börner, Jan ^a   Baylis, Kathy ^b   Corbera, Esteve ^c,d   Ezzine de Blas, Driss ^e   Ferraro, Paul J ^f   Honey Rosés, Jordi ^g   Lapeyre, Renaud ^h   Persson, U Martin ⁱ   Wunder, Sven ^j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c INSTITUT DE CIÈNCIA I TECNOLOGIA AMBIENTALS   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^e CIRAD   (France)

^f The Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^h SCIENCES PO   (France)

ⁱ CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^j CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Peru)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; EFFECT SIZE; INDONESIA; MEXICO; THEORETICAL MODEL; TROPICAL RAIN FOREST; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOREST; HUMAN; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; PROCEDURES; RESEARCH; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS; TROPIC CLIMATE;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; FORESTS; HUMANS; RESEARCH; TROPICAL CLIMATE;

EID: 84994383093     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308020     Document Type: Erratum

References (38)

1. FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2015.
2. Rudel TK, Coomes OT, Moran E, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu J, et al. Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change Part A. 2005; 15(1):23-31.
3. CBD. Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Montréal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2014.
4. Deininger K. Global land investments in the bio-economy: evidence and policy implications. Agricultural Economics. 2013; 44(s1):115-27.
5. Bringezu S, O'Brien M, Schütz H. Beyond biofuels: Assessing global land use for domestic consumption of biomass: A conceptual and empirical contribution to sustainable management of global resources. Land Use Policy. 2012; 29(1):224-32.
6. Henders S, Persson UM, Kastner T. Trading forests: land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities. Environmental Research Letters. 2015; 10 (12):125012.
7. Pattanayak SK, Wunder S, Ferraro PJ. Show Me the Money: Do Payments Supply Environmental Services in Developing Countries? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 2010; 4(2):254-74.
8. Ferraro PJ. The Future of Payments for Environmental Services. Conservation Biology. 2011; 25 (6):1134-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01791.x PMID: 22070269
9. Ferraro PJ. Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy. New Directions for Evaluation. 2009; 2009(122):75-84.
10. Baylis K, Honey-Rosés J, Börner J, Corbera E, Ezzine-de-Blas D, Ferraro P, et al. Mainstreaming impact evaluation in nature conservation. Conservation Letters. 2016; 9(1):58-64.
11. Arriagada RA, Echeverria CM, Moya DE. Creating protected areas on public lands: is there room for additional conservation? PloS one. 2016; 11(2):e0148094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148094 PMID: 26848856
12. Arriagada RA, Sills EO, Ferraro PJ, Pattanayak SK. Do Payments Pay Off? Evidence from Participation in Costa Rica's PES Program. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(7):e0131544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0131544 PMID: 26162000
13. Börner J, Kis-Katos K, Hargrave J, König K. Post-Crackdown Effectiveness of Field-Based Forest Law Enforcement in the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(4):e0121544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0121544 PMID: 25875656
14. Cisneros E, Zhou SL, Börner J. Naming and Shaming for Conservation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(9):e0136402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136402 PMID: 26398096
15. Costedoat S, Corbera E, Ezzine-de-Blas D, Honey-Rosés J, Baylis K, Castillo-Santiago MA. How Effective Are Biodiversity Conservation Payments in Mexico? PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(3):e0119881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119881 PMID: 25807118
16. Le Velly G, Dutilly C. Evaluating Payments for Environmental Services: Methodological Challenges. PloS one. 2016; 11(2):e0149374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149374 PMID: 26910850
17. Miteva DA, Loucks CJ, Pattanayak SK. Social and Environmental Impacts of Forest Management Certification in Indonesia. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(7):e0129675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129675 PMID: 26132491
18. Pagiola S, Honey-Rosés J, Freire-González J. Evaluation of the permanence of land use change induced by payments for environmental services in Quindío, Colombia. PloS one. 2016; 11(3): e0147829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147829 PMID: 26930668
19. Pailler S, Naidoo R, Burgess ND, Freeman OE, Fisher B. Impacts of Community-Based Natural Resource Management on Wealth, Food Security and Child Health in Tanzania. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10 (7):e0133252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133252 PMID: 26186210
20. Pfaff A, Robalino J, Herrera D, Sandoval C. Protected Areas' Impacts on Brazilian Amazon Deforestation: Examining Conservation-Development Interactions to Inform Planning. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(7): e0129460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129460 PMID: 26225922
21. Riehl B, Zerriffi H, Naidoo R. Effects of Community-Based Natural Resource Management on Household Welfare in Namibia. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(5):e0125531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125531 PMID: 25965379
22. Robalino J, Sandoval C, Barton DN, Chacon A, Pfaff A. Evaluating Interactions of Forest Conservation Policies on Avoided Deforestation. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(4):e0124910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0124910 PMID: 25909323
23. Shah P, Baylis K. Evaluating Heterogeneous Conservation Effects of Forest Protection in Indonesia. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(6):e0124872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124872 PMID: 26039754
24. Sills EO, Herrera D, Kirkpatrick AJ, Brandão A Jr., Dickson R, Hall S, et al. Estimating the Impacts of Local Policy Innovation: The Synthetic Control Method Applied to Tropical Deforestation. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(7):e0132590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132590 PMID: 26173108
25. Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA. Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis. 2007; 15(3):199-236.
26. Ferraro PJ, Hanauer MM. Quantifying causal mechanisms to determine how protected areas affect poverty through changes in ecosystem services and infrastructure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014; 111(11):4332-7.
27. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method. American Journal of Political Science. 2014:in press.
28. Börner J, Vosti S. Managing Tropical Forest Ecosystem Services: An Overview of Options. In: Muradian R, Rival L, editors. Governing the Provision of Ecosystem Services. Studies in Ecological Economics. 4: Springer Netherlands; 2013. p. 21-46.
29. Geldmann J, Barnes M, Coad L, Craigie ID, Hockings M, Burgess ND. Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biological Conservation. 2013 5//; 161:230-8.
30. Samii C, Lisiecki M, Kulkarni P, Paler L, Chavis L. Effects of Payment for Environmental Services (PES) on Deforestation and Poverty in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2014; 10(11).
31. Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali LM, Healey JR, Jones JPG, Knight TM, Pullin AS. Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2011 2012/02/01; 10(1):29-36.
32. Arriagada RA, Ferraro PJ, Sills EO, Pattanayak SK, Cordero-Sancho S. Do Payments for Environmental Services Affect Forest Cover? A Farm-Level Evaluation from Costa Rica. Land Economics. 2012; 88(2):382-99.
33. Fisher J. No pay, no care? A case study exploring motivations for participation in payments for ecosystem services in Uganda. Oryx. 2012; 46(01):45-54.
34. Puyravaud J-P. Standardizing the calculation of the annual rate of deforestation. Forest Ecology and Management. 2003 4/7/; 177(1-3):593-6.
35. Persson MU, Alpízar F. Conditional Cash Transfers and Payments for Environmental Services-A Conceptual Framework for Explaining and Judging Differences in Outcomes. World Development. 2013; 43:124-37.
36. Honey-Rosés J, Baylis K, Ramírez MI. A Spatially Explicit Estimate of Avoided Forest Loss. Conservation Biology. 2011; 25(5):1032-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01729.x PMID: 21902720
37. White H. Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice. Journal of development effectiveness. 2009; 1(3):271-84.
38. Ferraro PJ, Hanauer MM, Miteva DA, Nelson JL, Pattanayak SK, Nolte C, et al. Estimating the impacts of conservation on ecosystem services and poverty by integrating modeling and evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015; 112(24):7420-5.