Creating protected areas on public lands: Is there room for additional conservation?

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Arriagada, Rodrigo A ^a,b   Echeverria, Cristian M ^a,c   Moya, Danisa E ^a  

^a Millennium Nucleus Center for the Socioeconomic Impact of Environmental Policies (CESIEP)   (Chile)

^b Avenida Vicuña Mackenna   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFORESTATION; DEGRADATION; FOREST; WILDLIFE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; NATURAL RESOURCE; SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; NATURAL RESOURCES;

EID: 84959378341     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148094     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Turner BLI, Clark WC, Kates RW, Richards JF, Mathews JT, Meyer WB (1990) The Earth as Transformed by Human Action: Global and Regional Changes in the Biosphere Over the Past 300 Years. Cambridge: Cambridge Unievrsity Press.
2. Lambin EF, Baulies X, Bockstael N, Fischer G, Krug T, Leemans R, et al. (1999) Land-use and landcover change (LUCC): Implementation strategy. 126 p.
3. Robalino J, Villalobos L (2014) Protected areas and economic welfare: an impact evaluation of national parks on local workers' wages in Costa Rica. Environ Dev Econ: 1-28. Available: http://www.journals. cambridge.org/abstract-S1355770X14000461. Accessed 4 September 2014.
4. Joppa LN, Pfaff A (2009) High and Far: Biases in the Location of Protected Areas. PLoS One 4: e8273. Available: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008273. Accessed 26 May 2014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008273 PMID: 20011603
5. Robalino J (2007) Land conservation policies and income distribution: who bears the burden of our environmental efforts? Environ Dev Econ 12: 521. Available: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract-S1355770X07003671. Accessed 4 December 2012.
6. Miteva DA, Pattanayak SK, Ferraro PJ (2014) Do biodiversity policies work? The case for conservation evaluation 2.0. In: Helm D, Hepburn C, editors. Nature in the balance: the economics of biodiversity. Oxford University Press. pp. 301-315. doi: 10.1093/acprof
7. Kamal S, Grodzinska-Jurczak M (2014) Should conservation of biodiversity involve private land? A Q methodological study in Poland to assess stakeholders' attitude. Biodivers Conserv 23: 2689-2704. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10531-014-0744-0.
8. Joppa L, Pfaff A (2010) Reassessing the forest impacts of protection: the challenge of nonrandom location and a corrective method. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1185: 135-149. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/20146766. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05162.x PMID: 20146766
9. Andam KS, Ferraro PJ, Pfaff A, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Robalino J (2008) Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 16089-16094. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgiartid=2567237&tool= pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800437105 PMID: 18854414
10. Pfaff A, Robalino J, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Andam KS (2009) The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy Contributions Park Location Affects Forest Protection : Land Characteristics Cause Differences in Park Impacts across Costa Rica Park Location Affects Forest Protection : Land Characteristics Cause Differe. B E J Econom Anal Policy 9: 1-26.
11. Pfaff A, Robalino J, Herrera D, Sandoval C (2015) Protected Areas' Impacts on Brazilian Amazon Deforestation: Examining Conservation-Development Interactions to Inform Planning. PLoS One 10: e0129460. Available: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0129460 PMID: 26225922
12. Pfaff A, Pfaff A, Robalino J, Sandoval C, Herrera D (2015) Protected area types, strategies and impacts in Brazil's Amazon: public protected area strategies do not yield a consistent ranking of protected area types by impact. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0273
13. Ferraro PJ, Hanauer MM (2010) Protecting Ecosystems and Alleviating Poverty with Parks and Reserves: "Win-Win" or Tradeoffs? Environ Resour Econ 48: 269-286. Available: http://www. springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10640-010-9408-z. Accessed 1 November 2012.
14. Hansen A, Defries RS (2007) Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecol Appl 17: 974-988. PMID: 17555212
15. Wunder S (2007) The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conserv Biol 21: 48-58. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17298510. Accessed 1 November 2012. PMID: 17298510
16. Pauchard A, Villarroel P (2002) Protected Areas in Chile : History, Current Status, and Challenges. Conserv Issues 22: 318-330.
17. Donoso C (1993) Bosques templados de Chile y Argentina: variación, estructura y dinámica. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
18. Myers N, Mittermeier R, Mittermeier C, da Fonseca G, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10706275. PMID: 10706275
19. Dinerstein E, Olson D, Graham D, Webster A, Primm S, Bookbinder M, et al. (1995) A Conservation Assessment of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean.
20. CONAF, CONAMA, BIRF (1999) Catastro y evaluación de recursos vegetacionales nativos de Chile: informe nacional con variables ambientales. Santiago, Chile. 89 p.
21. Lara A, Little C, Urrutia R, McPhee J, Álvarez-Garretón C,Oyarzún C, et al. (2009) Assessment of ecosystem services as an opportunity for the conservation and management of native forests in Chile. For Ecol Manage 258: 415-424. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378112709000036. Accessed 8 November 2012.
22. Armesto JJ, Smith-Ramírez C, León P, Kalin-Arroyo M (1992) Biodiversidad y conservación del bosque templado en Chile. Ambient y Desarro Diciembre: 19-24.
23. Rozzi R, Armesto JJ, Figueroa J (1994) Biodiversidad y conservación de los bosques nativos de Chile : una aproximación jerárquica. Bosque 15: 55-64.
24. Neira E, Verscheure H, Revenga C (2002) Chilés frontier forests: conserving a global treasure. Valdivia, Chile. 57 p.
25. Cofre H, Marquet P a (1999) Conservation status, rarity, and geographic priorities for conservation of Chilean mammals: an assessment. Biol Conserv 88: 53-68. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006320798000901.
26. Basic Z, Arriagada RA (2012) Conservación de la biodiversidad y áreas protegidas en Chile. Agron y For UC 46: 18-23.
27. Abadie A, Imbens GW (2011) Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. J Bus Econ Stat 29: 1-11. doi: 10.1198/jbes.2009.07333
28. Pfaff ASP (1999) What Drives Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? J Environ Econ Manage 37: 26-43. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0095069698910567.
29. Carmona A, Nahuelhual L (2012) Combining land transitions and trajectories in assessing forest cover change. Appl Geogr 32: 904-915. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0143622811001755. Accessed 14 November 2012.
30. Chomitz KM, Gray D (1996) Roads, Land Use, and Deforestation: A Spatial Model Applied to Belize. World Bank Econ Rev 10: 487-512. Available: http://wber.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1093/wber/10. 3.487.
31. Pfaff A, Robalino J, Walker R, Aldrich S, Caldas M, Reis E, et al. (2007) Road investments, spatial spillovers and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J Reg Sci 47: 109-123.
32. Sims KRE (2010) Conservation and development: Evidence from Thai protected areas. J Environ Econ Manage 60: 94-114. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0095069610000586. Accessed 30 October 2012.
33. Arriagada RA, Ferraro PJ, Sills EO, Pattanayak SK, Cordero-Sancho S (2012) Do payments for environmental services affect forest cover A farm-level evaluation from Costa Rica. Land Econ 88: 382-399.
34. ImbensGW (2004) Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Rev Econ Stat 86: 4-29.
35. Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart ES (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Polit Anal 15: 199-236. Available: http://pan. oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1093/pan/mpl013. Accessed 19 September 2013.
36. Sekhon J (2011) Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: the matching package for R. J Stat Softw 42: 1-52.
37. Abadie A, Imbens GW (2008) On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica 76: 1537-1557. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.3982/ECTA6474. Accessed 18 September 2013.
38. Abadie A, Imbens GW (2006) Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74: 235-267.
39. Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J Econ Lit 47: 5-86.
40. Rosenbaum P (2010) Design of observational studies. London: Springer. 384 p.
41. Diprete TA, Gangl M (2004) Assessing Bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociol Methodol 34: 271-310.