Virological and cytological clearance in laser vaporization and conization for cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia grade 3

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research

Volumn 42, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 1808-1813

  Mariya, Tasuku ^a,b   Nishikawa, Akira ^a   Sogawa, Kanae ^a   Suzuki, Riri ^a   Saito, Masae ^a   Kawamata, Akari ^a   Shimizu, Ayumi ^a   Nihei, Takehito ^a   Sonoda, Tomoko ^b   Saito, Tsuyoshi ^b  

^a Sapporo Medical Center   (Japan)

^b SAPPORO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

cervical intra epithelial neoplasia grade 3; human papilloma virus; laser conization; laser vaporization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER RISK; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIODE LASER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 11; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 16; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 18; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 30; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 31; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 33; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 35; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 39; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 45; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 51; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 52; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 56; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 58; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 59; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 6; HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS TYPE 66; INFORMED CONSENT; LASER CONIZATION; LASER SURGERY; LASER VAPORIZATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NONHUMAN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; VIRAL CLEARANCE; WART VIRUS; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COMPLICATION; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR RECURRENCE; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; VIROLOGY;

ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CONIZATION; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LASER THERAPY; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PAPILLOMAVIRIDAE; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84994285964     PISSN: 13418076     EISSN: 14470756     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jog.13113     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Montz FJ. Management of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and potential complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 43: 394–409.
2. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for Screening and Treatment of Precancerous Lesions for Cervical Cancer Prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013.
3. Muñoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 518–527.
4. Bosch FX, Burchell AN, Schiffman M et al. Epidemiology and natural history of human papillomavirus infections and type-specific implications in cervical neoplasia. Vaccine 2008; 26: K1–K16.
5. Holowaty P, Miller AB, Rohan T, To T. Natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 252–258.
6. Follen Mitchell M, Tortolero-Luna G, Cook E, Whittaker L, Rhodes-Morris H, Silva E. A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92: 737–744.
7. Vejerslev LO, Schouenborg L, Sørensen F et al. Loop diathermy or laser excisional conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 900–905.
8. Shin JW, Rho HS, Park CY. Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009; 35: 126–130.
9. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Meta-analysis. BMJ 2008; 337: a1284.
10. Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Arbyn M et al. Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2014; 6192: 1–17.
11. Partington CK, Turner MJ, Soutter WP, Griffiths M, Krausz T. Laser vaporization versus laser excision conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 775–779.
12. Nishiwaki M, Yamamoto T, Tone S et al. Genotyping of human papillomaviruses by a novel one-step typing method with multiplex PCR and clinical applications. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46: 1161–1168.
13. van der Heijden E, Lopes AD, Bryant A, Bekkers R, Galaal K. Follow-up strategies after treatment (large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN): Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) test. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 1.CD010757
14. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2006; 367: 489–498.
15. Melnikow J, McGahan C, Sawaya GF, Ehlen T, Coldman A. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after treatment: Long-term follow-up from the British Columbia Cohort Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009; 101: 721–728.
16. Kocken M, Helmerhorst TJM, Berkhof J et al. Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: A long-term multi-cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12: 441–450.
17. Martin-Hirsch PPL, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A, Dickinson HO. Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 12.CD001318
18. Miura S, Matsumoto K, Oki A et al. Do we need a different strategy for HPV screening and vaccination in East Asia? Int J Cancer 2006; 11: 2713–2715.
19. Rositch AF, Soeters HM, Offutt-Powell TN, Wheeler BS, Taylor SM, Smith JS. The incidence of human papillomavirus infection following treatment for cervical neoplasia: A systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 132: 767–779.