An assessment of the compliance of systematic review articles published in craniofacial surgery with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 44, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 1522-1530

  Pidgeon, Thomas Edward ^a,b   Wellstead, Georgina ^a,c   Sagoo, Harkiran ^a,d   Jafree, Daniyal J ^a,e   Fowler, Alexander J ^a,f   Agha, Riaz A ^a,f,g  

^a The Academic Surgical Collaborative   (United Kingdom)

^b BROOMFIELD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^f GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^g BALLIOL COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Craniofacial surgery; PRISMA; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CHECKLIST; CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY; DATA EXTRACTION; DATA SYNTHESIS; FUNDING; HUMAN; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; PATHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SCIENTIST; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; LITERATURE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; PUBLICATION; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84994181284     PISSN: 10105182     EISSN: 18784119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Agha, R.A., Camm, C.F., Doganay, E., Edison, E., Siddiqui, M.R.S., Orgill, D.P., Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: a systematic review of reporting quality. Eur J Plast Surg 37 (2014), 55–62.
2. Agha, R.A., Rosin, D., The Research Registry – answering the call to register every research study involving human participants. Int J Surg 16:Pt A (2015), 113–115.
3. Booth, A., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Moher, D., Petticrew, M., Stewart, L., An international registry of systematic-review protocols. Lancet 377:9760 (2011), 108–109.
4. Burda, B., Holmer, H., Norris, S., Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement. Syst Rev, 5(1), 2016, 58.
5. Doumit, G.D., Papay, F.A., Moores, N., Meisler, E., Zins, J.E., Opinion leaders and evidence-based medicine in craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg 25:1 (2014), 106–110.
6. Fleming, P.S., Seehra, J., Polychronopoulou, A., Fedorowicz, Z., Pandis, N., A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics. Angle Orthod 83:1 (2013), 158–163.
7. Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., (eds.) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 2011 Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration.
8. Hunter, C., Januszyk, M., Wan, D.C., Momeni, A., Systematic reviews in craniofacial trauma-strengths and weaknesses. Ann Plast Surg 77:3 (2016), 363–368.
9. Klimo, P., Thompson, C.J., Ragel, B.T., Boop, F.A., Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature. J Neurosurg 120:4 (2014), 796–810.
10. Knobloch, K., Yoon, U., Vogt, P.M., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 39:2 (2011), 91–92.
11. Lee, J.S., In search of the highest quality: levels of evidence in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72:11 (2014), 2102–2104.
12. Lee, S.-Y., Sagoo, H., Whitehurst, K., Wellstead, G., Fowler, A.J., Agha, R.A., et al. Compliance of systematic reviews in plastic surgery with the PRISMA statement. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 18:2 (2015), 101–105.
13. Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P.A., et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62:10 (2009), e1–e34.
14. Moher, D., Cook, D.J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., Stroup, D.F., Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet 354:9193 (1999), 1896–1900.
15. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:4 (2009), 264–269 W64.
16. Moher, D., Simera, I., Schulz, K.F., Hoey, J., Altman, D.G., Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research. BMC Med 16 (2008), 6–13.
17. Moher, D., Tetzlaff, J., Tricco, A.C., Sampson, M., Altman, D.G., Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med, 4(3), 2007, e78.
18. Reuters, ISI journal citation reports., 2013, Web of Science Available at: http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/JCR.
19. Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M.C., Gray, J.A.M., Haynes, R.B., Richardson, W.S., Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455 (2007), 3–5.
20. Shea, B.J., Hamel, C., Wells, G.A., Bouter, L.M., Kristjansson, E., Grimshaw, J., et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 62:10 (2009), 1013–1020.
21. Susarla, S.M., Mundinger, G.S., Swanson, E.W., Basile, L.E., Redett, R.J., Dodson, T.B., What is the quality of the evidence in the craniomaxillofacial surgery literature?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73:10 (2015), 2017–2023.
22. Szpalski, C., Weichman, K., Sagebin, F., Warren, S.M., Need for standard outcome reporting systems in craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Focus, 31(2), 2011, E1.