HENRY-CORE: Domain Adaptation and Stacking for Text Similarity

*SEM 2013 - 2nd Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 96-102

  Heilman, Michael ^a   Madnani, Nitin ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM;

DOMAIN ADAPTATION; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; SUBTASKS; TEXT SIMILARITY; TEXTUAL SIMILARITIES;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84994168103     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Eneko Agirre, Daniel Cer, Mona Diab, and Aitor Gonzalez-Agirre. 2012. Semeval-2012 task 6: A pilot on semantic textual similarity. In ∗SEM 2012: The First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics – Volume 1: Proceedings of the main conference and the shared task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2012), pages 385–393, Montréal, Canada, 7-8 June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Eneko Agirre, Daniel Cer, Mona Diab, Aitor Gonzalez-Agirre, and Weiwei Guo. 2013. ∗sem 2013 shared task: Semantic textual similarity, including a pilot on typed-similarity. In ∗SEM 2013: The Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Daniel Bär, Chris Biemann, Iryna Gurevych, and Torsten Zesch. 2012. UKP: Computing semantic textual similarity by combining multiple content similarity measures. In ∗SEM 2012: The First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics – Volume 1: Proceedings of the main conference and the shared task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2012), pages 435–440, Montréal, Canada, 7-8 June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Beata Beigman Klebanov, Jill Burstein, Nitin Madnani, Adam Faulkner, and Joel Tetreault. 2012. Building sentiment lexicon(s) from scratch for essay data. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing), New Delhi, India, March.
5. S. Bird, E. Klein, and E. Loper. 2009. Natural Language Processing with Python. O’Reilly Media.
6. David Chen and William Dolan. 2011. Collecting highly parallel data for paraphrase evaluation. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 190–200, Portland, Oregon, USA, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Hal Daume III. 2007. Frustratingly easy domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 256–263, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Bill Dolan, Chris Quirk, and Chris Brockett. 2004. Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: Exploiting massively parallel news sources. In Proceedings of Coling 2004, pages 350–356, Geneva, Switzerland, Aug 23–Aug 27. COLING.
9. C. Fellbaum. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Bradford Books.
10. Charles J. Fillmore, Christopher R. Johnson, and Miriam R.L. Petruck. 2003. Background to Framenet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3):235–250.
11. Michael Heilman and Nitin Madnani. 2012. ETS: Discriminative edit models for paraphrase scoring. In ∗SEM 2012: The First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics – Volume 1: Proceedings of the main conference and the shared task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2012), pages 529–535, Montréal, Canada, 7-8 June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. C. Leacock and M. Chodorow. 2003. c-rater: Scoring of short-answer questions. Computers and the Humanities, 37.
13. Rodney D. Nielsen, Wayne Ward, and James H. Martin. 2008. Classification errors in a domain-independent assessment system. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, pages 10–18, Columbus, Ohio, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duches-nay. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825–2830.
15. S. S. Pradhan and N. Xue. 2009. OntoNotes: The 90% solution. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Companion Volume: Tutorial Abstracts, pages 11–12.
16. M. A. Przybocki, K. Peterson, S. Bronsart, and G. A. Sanders. 2009. The NIST 2008 metrics for machine translation challenge - overview, methodology, metrics, and results. Machine Translation, 23(2-3):71–103.
17. Matthew G. Snover, Nitin Madnani, Bonnie Dorr, and Richard Schwartz. 2009. TER-Plus: Paraphrase, semantic, and alignment enhancements to translation edit rate. Machine Translation, 23(2-3):117–127, September.
18. Frane Sari, Goran Glavaš, Mladen Karan, Jan Šnajder, and Bojana Dalbelo Basi. 2012. TakeLab: Systems for measuring semantic text similarity. In ∗SEM 2012: The First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics – Volume 1: Proceedings of the main conference and the shared task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2012), pages 441–448, Montréal, Canada, 7-8 June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. Mengqiu Wang, Noah A. Smith, and Teruko Mita-mura. 2007. What is the Jeopardy model? a quasi-synchronous grammar for QA. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), pages 22–32, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. David H. Wolpert. 1992. Stacked generalization. Neural Networks, 5:241–259.