An Exploration of Discourse-Based Sentence Spaces for Compositional Distributional Semantics

EMNLP 2015 - Workshop on Linking Models of Lexical, Sentential and Discourse-level Semantics, LSDSem 2015, Workshop Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1-11

  Polajnar, Tamara ^a   Rimell, Laura ^a   Clark, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

CONTEXT CAPTURE; DISTRIBUTIONAL SEMANTICS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMPLE++; USER EXPERIMENTS;

VECTOR SPACES;

EID: 84994160056     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Marco Baroni, Raffaella Bernardi, and Roberto Zamparelli. 2014. Frege in space: A program for compositional distributional semantics. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 9:5-110.
2. Nathanael Chambers and Dan Jurafsky. 2008. Unsupervised learning of narrative event chains. In Proceedings of ACL-HLT.
3. Nathanael Chambers and Dan Jurafsky. 2009. Unsupervised learning of narrative schemas and their participants. In Proceedings of ACL-IJCNLP.
4. J. Chang, J. Boyd-Graber, S. Gerrish, C. Wang, and D. Blei. 2009. Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21 (NIPS-09), page 288296, Vancouver, Canada.
5. Stephen Clark. Vector space models of lexical meaning. In Shalom Lappin and Chris Fox, editors, Handbook of Contemporary Semantics second edition (to appear). Wiley-Blackwell, 2015.
6. Stephen Clark. Type-driven syntax and semantics for composing meaning vectors. In Chris Heunen, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, and Edward Grefenstette, editors, Quantum Physics and Linguistics: A Compositional, Diagrammatic Discourse, pages 359-377. Oxford University Press, 2013.
7. Stephen Clark and James R. Curran. 2007. Wide-coverage efficient statistical parsing with CCG and log-linear models. Computational Linguistics, 33(4):493-552.
8. Bob Coecke, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, and Stephen Clark. Mathematical foundations for a compositional distributional model of meaning. In J. van Bentham, M. Moortgat, and W. Buszkowski, editors, Linguistic Analysis (Lambek Festschrift), volume 36, pages 345-384. 2010.
9. James R. Curran. From Distributional to Semantic Similarity. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2004.
10. Daniel Fried, Tamara Polajnar, and Stephen Clark. 2015. Low-rank tensors for verbs in compositional distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the 53nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2015), Bejing, China.
11. Edward Grefenstette. Category-Theoretic Quantitative Compositional Distributional Models of Natural Language Semantics. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, 2013.
12. Edward Grefenstette and Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh. July 2011a. Experimental support for a categorical compositional distributional model of meaning. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1394-1404, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
13. Edward Grefenstette and Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh. 2011b. Experimenting with transitive verbs in a discocat. In Proceedings of the GEMS 2011 Workshop on Geometrical Models of Natural Languge, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
14. Edward Grefenstette, Georgiana Dinu, Yao-Zhong Zhang, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, and Marco Baroni. 2013. Multi-step regression learning for compositional distributional semantics. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2013).
15. Kazuma Hashimoto and Yoshimasa Tsuruoka. 2015. Learning embeddings for transitive verb disambiguation by implicit tensor factorization. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and their Compositionality (CVSC), Beijing, China.
16. Dimitri Kartsaklis and Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh. June 2014. A study of entanglement in a categorical framework of natural language. In Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Quantum Physics and Logic (QPL), Kyoto, Japan.
17. Dimitri Kartsaklis, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, and Stephen Pulman. 2012. A unified sentence space for categorical distributional-compositional semantics: Theory and experiments. In Proceedings of COLING, pages 549-558.
18. Ryan Kiros, Yukun Zhu, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Richard S. Zemel, Antonio Torralba, Raquel Urtasun, and Sanja Fidler. 2015. Skip-thought vectors. CoRR, abs/1506.06726. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.06726.
19. Quoc Le and Tomas Mikolov. 2014. Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In Proceedings of ICML.
20. K. McRae, V. R. de Sa, and M. S. Seidenberg. Jun 1997. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 126(2):99-130. ISSN 0096-3445.
21. Dmitrijs Milajevs, Dimitri Kartsaklis, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, and Matthew Purver. 2014. Evaluating neural word representations in tensor-based compositional settings. In Proceedings of EMNLP, Doha Qatar.
22. Guido Minnen, John Carroll, and Darren Pearce. 2001. Applied morphological processing of English. Natural Language Engineering, 7(3):207-223.
23. Tamara Polajnar and Stephen Clark. 2014. Improving distributional semantic vectors through context selection and normalisation. In 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL'14, Gothenburg, Sweden.
24. Tamara Polajnar, Luana Fagarasan, and Stephen Clark. 2014a. Reducing dimensions of tensors in type-driven distributional semantics. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2014, Doha, Qatar.
25. Tamara Polajnar, Laura Rimell, and Stephen Clark. 2014b. Using sentence plausibility to learn the semantics of transitive verbs. CoRR, abs/1411.7942. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.7942.
26. R. Prasad, N. Dinesh, A. Lee, E. Miltsakaki, L. Robaldo, A. Joshi, and B.Webber. 2008. The Penn discourse TreeBank 2.0. In Proceedings of LREC, pages 2,9612,968.
27. Rashmi Prasad, Bonnie Webber, and Aravind Joshi. 2014. Reflections on the Penn discourse TreeBank, comparable corpora and complementary annotation. Computational Linguistics, 40(4):921-950.
28. Richard Socher, Eric H. Huang, Jeffrey Pennington, Andrew Y. Ng, and Christopher D. Manning. 2011a. Dynamic pooling and unfolding recursive autoencoders for paraphrase detection. In Proceedings of NIPS.
29. Richard Socher, Cliff Lin, Andrew Y. Ng, and Christopher D. Manning. 2011b. Parsing natural scenes and natural language with recursive neural networks. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2011), Bellevue, Washington.
30. Richard Socher, Brody Huval, Christopher D. Manning, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2012. Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1201-1211, Jeju, Korea.
31. Richard Socher, John Bauer, Christopher D. Manning, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2013. Parsing with compositional vector grammars. In Proceedings of ACL.
32. Peter D. Turney and Patrick Pantel. 2010. From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 37:141-188.
33. Matthew D. Zeiler. 2012. ADADELTA: an adaptive learning rate method. CoRR, abs/1212.5701.