The effect of bracket ligation on the periodontal status of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 54, Issue , 2016, Pages 13-24

  Arnold, Sina ^a   Koletsi, Despina ^a   Patcas, Raphael ^a   Eliades, Theodore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Fixed appliances; Ligation; Meta analysis; Orthodontic; Periodontal status

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; DENTAL PROCEDURE; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MOUTH HYGIENE; ORTHODONTIC BRACKET; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PERIODONTAL INDEX;

ADOLESCENT; DENTAL CARE; HUMANS; ORAL HYGIENE; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PERIODONTAL DISEASES; PERIODONTAL INDEX;

EID: 84994082384     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.006     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. [1] Pender, N., Aspects of oral health in orthodontic patients. Br. J. Orthod. 13 (1986), 95–103.
2. [2] Forsberg, C.M., Brattstrom, V., Malmberg, E., Nord, C.E., Ligature wires and elastomeric rings: two methods of ligation, and their association with microbial colonization of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli. Eur. J. Orthod. 13 (1991), 416–420.
3. [3] Turkkahraman, H., Sayin, M.O., Bozkurt, F.Y., Yetkin, Z., Kaya, S., Onal, S., Archwire ligation techniques, microbial colonization, and periodontal status in orthodontically treated patients. Angle Orthod. 75 (2005), 231–236.
4. [4] Jordan, C., LeBlanc, D.J., Influences of orthodontic appliances on oral populations of mutans streptococci. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 17 (2002), 65–71.
5. [5] Pellegrini, P., Sauerwein, R., Finlayson, T., McLeod, J., Covell, D.A., Maier, T. Jr., Machida, C.A., Plaque retention by self-ligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop 135:426 (2009), e1–e9 discussion 26–27.
6. [6] Scheie, A.A., Arneberg, P., Krogstad, O., Effect of orthodontic treatment on prevalence of Streptococcus mutans in plaque and saliva. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 92 (1984), 211–217.
7. [7] Balenseifen, J.W., Madonia, J.V., Study of dental plaque in orthodontic patients. J. Dent. Res. 49 (1970), 320–324.
8. [8] Wites, M., Panuszka, J., Dyras, M., Evaluation of oral and orthodontic appliance hygiene in orthodontically treated patients. Przegl. Lek. J. 60:Suppl. 6 (2003), 126–128.
9. [9] Lara-Carrillo, E., Montiel-Bastida, N.M., Sanchez-Perez, L., Alanis-Tavira, J., Effect of orthodontic treatment on saliva, plaque and the levels of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal 15 (2010), e924–29.
10. [10] Arends, J., Christoffersen, J., The nature of early caries lesions in enamel. J. Dent. Res. 65 (1986), 2–11.
11. [11] O'Reilly, M.M., Featherstone, J.D., Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 92 (1987), 33–40.
12. [12] Ogaard, B., Rolla, G., Arends, J., ten Cate, J.M., Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 2. Prevention and treatment of lesions. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 94 (1988), 123–128.
13. [13] Gorelick, L., Geiger, A.M., Gwinnett, A.J., Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am. J. Orthod. 81 (1982), 93–98.
14. [14] Mizrahi, E., Surface distribution of enamel opacities following orthodontic treatment. Am. J. Orthod. 84 (1983), 323–331.
15. [15] Sanders, N.L., Evidence-based care in orthodontics and periodontics: a review of the literature. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 130 (1999), 521–527.
16. [16] Artun, J., Brobakken, B.O., Prevalence of carious white spots after orthodontic treatment with multibonded appliances. Eur. J. Orthod. 8 (1986), 229–234.
17. [17] Kloehn, J.S., Pfeifer, J.S., The effect of orthodontic treatment on the periodontium. Angle Orthod. 44 (1974), 127–134.
18. [18] Loe, H., Theilade, E., Jensen, S.B., Experimental gingivitis in man. J. Periodontol. 36 (1965), 177–187.
19. [19] Ericsson, I., Thilander, B., Lindhe, J., Periodontal conditions after orthodontic tooth movements in the dog. Angle Orthod. 48 (1978), 210–218.
20. [20] Naranjo, A.A., Trivino, M.L., Jaramillo, A., Betancourth, M., Botero, J.E., Changes in the subgingival microbiota and periodontal parameters before and 3 months after bracket placement. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 130:275 (2006), e17–e22.
21. [21] Ristic, M., Vlahovic Svabic, M., Sasic, M., Zelic, O., Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances on periodontal tissues in adolescents. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 10 (2007), 187–195.
22. [22] Paolantonio, M., di Girolamo, G., Pedrazzoli, V., di Murro, C., Picciani, C., Catamo, G., Cattabriga, M., Piccolomini, R., Occurrence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in patients wearing orthodontic appliances. A cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 23 (1996), 112–118.
23. [23] Huser, M.C., Baehni, P.C., Lang, R., Effects of orthodontic bands on microbiologic and clinical parameters. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 97 (1990), 213–218.
24. [24] Sinclair, P.M., Berry, C.W., Bennett, C.L., Israelson, H., Changes in gingiva and gingival flora with bonding and banding. Angle Orthod. 57 (1987), 271–278.
25. [25] Ash, M.M., Gitlin, B.N., Smith, W.A., Correlation between plaque and gingivitis. J. Periodontol. 35 (1964), 424–429.
26. [26] Zachrisson, B.U., Gingival condition associated with orthodontic treatment. II. Histologic findings. Angle Orthod. 42 (1972), 353–357.
27. [27] Zachrisson, S., Zachrisson, B.U., Gingival condition associated with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 42 (1972), 26–34.
28. [28] Boyd, R.L., Baumrind, S., Periodontal considerations in the use of bonds or bands on molars in adolescents and adults. Angle Orthod. 62 (1992), 117–126.
29. [29] Pandis, N., Papaioannou, W., Kontou, E., Nakou, M., Makou, M., Eliades, T., Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Eur. J. Orthod. 32 (2010), 94–99.
30. [30] Alves de Souza, R., Borges de Araujo Magnani, M.B., Nouer, D.F., Oliveira da Silva, C., Klein, M.I., Sallum, E.A., Goncalves, R.B., Periodontal and microbiologic evaluation of 2 methods of archwire ligation: ligature wires and elastomeric rings. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 134 (2008), 506–512.
31. [31] Garcez, A.S., Suzuki, S.S., Ribeiro, M.S., Mada, E.Y., Freitas, A.Z., Suzuki, H., Biofilm retention by 3 methods of ligation on orthodontic brackets: a microbiologic and optical coherence tomography analysis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 140 (2011), e193–98.
32. [32] Stolzenberg, J., The Russell attachment and its improved advantages. Int. J. Orthod. Dent. Child. 21 (1935), 837–840.
33. [33] Keim, R.G., Gottlieb, E.L., Nelson, A.H., Vogels, D.S. 3rd., 2002 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. J. Clin. Orthod. 36 (2002), 553–568.
34. [34] Keim, E.L., Gottlieb, A.H., JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, Part 1: results and trends. J. Clin. Orthod. 42 (2008), 625–640.
35. [35] Damon, D.H., The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. Clin. Orthod. Res. 1 (1998), 52–61.
36. [36] Damon, D.H., The Damon low-friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J. Clin. Orthod. 32 (1998), 670–680.
37. [37] Berger, J.L., The speed system: an overview of the appliance and clinical performance. Semin. Orthod. 14 (2008), 54–63.
38. [38] Griffiths, H.S., Sherriff, M., Ireland, A.J., Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 127 (2005), 670–675 quiz 754.
39. [39] Harradine, N.W., Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin. Orthod. Res. 4 (2001), 220–227.
40. [40] Maijer, R., Smith, D.C., Time savings with self-ligating brackets. J. Clin. Orthod. 24 (1990), 29–31.
41. [41] Paduano, S., Cioffi, I., Iodice, G., Rapuano, A., Silva, R., Time efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems. Prog. Orthod. 9 (2008), 74–80.
42. [42] Chen, S.S., Greenlee, G.M., Kim, J.E., Smith, C.L., Huang, G.J., Systematic review of self-ligating brackets. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 137:726 (2010), e1–e26 e18; discussion 26–27.
43. [43] Fleming, P.S., Johal, A., Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 80 (2010), 575–584.
44. [44] Pejda, S., Varga, M.L., Milosevic, S.A., Mestrovic, S., Slaj, M., Repic, D., Bosnjak, A., Clinical and microbiological parameters in patients with self-ligating and conventional brackets during early phase of orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 83 (2013), 133–139.
45. [45] Cardoso Mde, A., Saraiva, P.P., Maltagliati, L.A., Rhoden, F.K., Costa, C.C., Normando, D., Capelozza Filho, L., Alterations in plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation promoted by treatment with self-ligating and conventional orthodontic brackets. Dent. Press J. Orthod. 20 (2015), 35–41.
46. [46] Atik, E., Ciger, S., An assessment of conventional and self-ligating brackets in Class I maxillary constriction patients. Angle Orthod. 84 (2014), 615–622.
47. [47] Nalcaci, R., Ozat, Y., Cokakoglu, S., Turkkahraman, H., Onal, S., Kaya, S., Effect of bracket type on halitosis, periodontal status, and microbial colonization. Angle Orthod. 84 (2014), 479–485.
48. [48] Baka, Z.M., Basciftci, F.A., Arslan, U., Effects of 2 bracket and ligation types on plaque retention: a quantitative microbiologic analysis with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 144 (2013), 260–267.
49. [49] Kaygisiz, E., Uzuner, F.D., Yuksel, S., Taner, L., Culhaoglu, R., Sezgin, Y., Ates, C., Effects of self-ligating and conventional brackets on halitosis and periodontal conditions. Angle Orthod. 85 (2015), 468–473.
50. [50] Akgun, O.M., Altug, H., Karacay, S., Guven Polat, G., Duyan, S., Bedir, O., Effect of 2 elastomeric ligatures on microbial flora and periodontal status in orthodontic patients. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 145 (2014), 667–671.
51. [51] Pandis, N., Vlachopoulos, K., Polychronopoulou, A., Madianos, P., Eliades, T., Periodontal condition of the mandibular anterior dentition in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 11 (2008), 211–215.
52. [52] Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., Group, P., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62 (2009), 1006–1012.
53. [53] Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P.J., Kleijnen, J., Moher, D., The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62 (2009), e1–34.
54. [54] Higgins, J.P.T., Altman, D.G., Sterne, J.A.C., Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., (eds.) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2011, Wiley, Chichester.
55. [55] Higgins, J.P., Thompson, S.G., Deeks, J.J., Altman, D.G., Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br. Med. J. 327 (2003), 557–560.
56. [56] Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T., Rothstein, H.R., Introduction to Meta-Analysis. first ed., 2009, Wiley, Chichester.
57. [57] Sterne, J.A.C., Egger, M., Moher, D., Chapter 10: addressing reporting biases. Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S., (eds.) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention, 2011, Wiley, Chichester.
58. [58] Balshem, H., Helfand, M., Schunemann, H.J., Oxman, A.D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., Vist, G.E., Falck-Ytter, Y., Meerpohl, J., Norris, S., Guyatt, G.H., GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 64 (2011), 401–406.
59. [59] Guyatt, G.H., Oxman, A.D., Vist, G.E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., Schunemann, H.J., Group, G.W., GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br. Med. J. 336 (2008), 924–926.
60. [60] Van Gastel, J., Quirynen, M., Teughels, W., Pauwels, M., Coucke, W., Carels, C., Microbial adhesion on different bracket types in vitro. Angle Orthod. 79 (2009), 915–921.
61. [61] Hamp, S.E., Lundstrom, F., Nyman, S., Periodontal conditions in adolescents subjected to multiband orthodontic treatment with controlled oral hygiene. Eur. J. Orthod. 4 (1982), 77–86.
62. [62] Hohoff, A., Stamm, T., Kuhne, N., Wiechmann, D., Haufe, S., Lippold, C., Ehmer, U., Effects of a mechanical interdental cleaning device on oral hygiene in patients with lingual brackets. Angle Orthod. 73 (2003), 579–587.
63. [63] Al-Jewair, T.S., Suri, S., Tompson, B.D., Predictors of adolescent compliance with oral hygiene instructions during two-arch multibracket fixed orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 81 (2011), 525–531.
64. [64] Lindel, I.D., Elter, C., Heuer, W., Heidenblut, T., Stiesch, M., Schwestka-Polly, R., Demling, A.P., Comparative analysis of long-term biofilm formation on metal and ceramic brackets. Angle Orthod. 81 (2011), 907–914.
65. [65] Crocombe, L.A., Brennan, D.S., Slade, G.D., Do, L., Is self interdental cleaning associated with dental plaque levels, dental calculus, gingivitis and periodontal disease?. J. Periodontol. Res. 47 (2012), 188–197.
66. [66] Boyd, R.L., Leggott, P.J., Quinn, R.S., Eakle, W.S., Chambers, D., Periodontal implications of orthodontic treatment in adults with reduced or normal periodontal tissues versus those of adolescents. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 96 (1989), 191–198.
67. [67] Smiech-Slomkowska, G., Jablonska-Zrobek, J., The effect of oral health education on dental plaque development and the level of caries-related Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. Eur. J. Orthod. 29 (2007), 157–160.
68. [68] Koletsi, D., Fleming, P.S., Eliades, T., Pandis, N., The evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in orthodontic literature. Where do we stand?. Eur. J. Orthod. 37 (2015), 603–609.