An assessment of conventional and self-ligating brackets in Class i maxillary constriction patients

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 615-622

  Atik, Ezgi ^a   Ciǧer, Semra ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Damon; Edgewise; Maxillary arch expansion; Quad helix

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CANINE TOOTH; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICES; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTIC BRACKET; ORTHODONTIC PROCEDURE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PALATAL EXPANSION; PATHOLOGY; PERIODONTAL INDEX; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH ARCH;

ADOLESCENT; BICUSPID; CEPHALOMETRY; CUSPID; DENTAL ARCH; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MODELS, DENTAL; MOLAR; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; OVERBITE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PALATAL EXPANSION TECHNIQUE; PERIODONTAL INDEX; PHOTOGRAPHY;

EID: 84903604057     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 19457103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/093013-712.1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Weinberg M, Sadowsky C. Resolution of mandibular arch crowding in growing patients with Class I malocclusions treated nonextraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:359-364.
2. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby Co; 2000.
3. Birnie DJ. The Damon passive self-ligating appliance system. Semin Orthod. 2008;14:19-35.
4. Damon D. Damon System: The Workbook. Orange, Calif: Ormco; 2004.
5. Vajaria R, BeGole E, Kusnoto B, Galang MT, Obrez A. Evaluation of incisor position and dental transverse dimensional changes using the Damon system. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:647-652.
6. Tecco S, Tete S, Perillo L, Chimenti C, Festa F. Maxillary arch width changes during orthodontic treatment with fixed self-ligating and traditional straight-wire appliances. World J Orthod. 2009;10:290-294.
7. Jiang RP, Fu MK. Non-extraction treatment with self-ligating and conventional brackets. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008;43:459-463.
8. Yu YL, Tang GH, Gong FF, Chen LL, Qian YF. A comparison of rapid palatal expansion and Damon appliance on non-extraction correction of dental crowding. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2008;17:237-242.
9. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132:208-215.
10. Pandis N, Strigou S, Eliades T. Maxillary incisor torque with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a prospective clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2006;9:193-198.
11. Frankel R. A functional approach to orofacial orthopaedics. Br J Orthod. 1980;7:41-51.
12. Cattaneo PM, Treccani M, Carlsson K, et al. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14:222-233.
13. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Makou M, Eliades T. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:248-253.
14. Pandis N, Vlachopoulos K, Polychronopoulou A, Madianos P, Eliades T. Periodontal condition of the mandibular anterior dentition in patients with conventional and selfligating brackets. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11:211-215.
15. Pejda S, Varga ML, Milosevic SA, et al. Clinical and microbiological parameters in patients with self-ligating and conventional brackets during early phase of orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:133-139.
16. Pellegrini P, Sauerwein R, Finlayson T, et al. Plaque retention by self-ligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:421-429.
17. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2: 1127-1131.
18. Scott J, Huskisson EC. Accuracy of subjective measurements made with or without previous scores: an important source of error in serial measurement of subjective states. Ann Rheum Dis. 1979;38:558-559.
19. Jones M, Chan C. The pain and discomfort experienced during orthodontic treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial of two initial aligning arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102:373-381.
20. Scheurer PA, Firestone AR, Burgin WB. Perception of pain as a result of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:349-357.
21. Fernandes LM, Ogaard B, Skoglund L. Pain and discomfort experienced after placement of a conventional or a superelastic NiTi aligning archwire. A randomized clinical trial. J Orofac Orthop. 1998;59:331-339.
22. Scott P, Sherriff M, Dibiase AT, Cobourne MT. Perception of discomfort during initial orthodontic tooth alignment using a self-ligating or conventional bracket system: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:227-232.
23. Tecco S, DAttilio M, Tete S, Festa F. Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:380-384.
24. Pringle AM, Petrie A, Cunningham SJ, McKnight M. Prospective randomized clinical trial to compare pain levels associated with 2 orthodontic fixed bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:160-167.
25. Matarese G, Nucera R, Militi A, et al. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:708-715.
26. Heo W, Baek SH. Friction properties according to vertical and horizontal tooth displacement and bracket type during initial leveling and alignment. Angle Orthod. 2011;81: 653-661.
27. Bergius M, Kiliaridis S, Berggren U. Pain in orthodontics. A review and discussion of the literature. J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61:125-137.