A dataflow-oriented modeling approach to business processes

International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 51-65

  Bruno, Giorgio ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Artifacts; Business Entities; Business Processes; Human Decisions; Life Cycles; Task Patterns; Tasks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994016221     PISSN: 19473478     EISSN: 19473486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/IJHCITP.2017010104     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bruno, G. (2014). Combining flexibility and data handling in business process models. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals, 5(2), 14-27. doi:10.4018/ijhcitp.2014040102
2. Bruno, G. (2015). Data flow and human tasks in business process models. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 379-386. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.502
3. Cabanillas, C., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A., & Awad, A. (2011). Automatic generation of a data-centered view of business processes. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering, LNCS (Vol. 6741, pp. 352-366). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4-27
4. Chao, T., Cohn, D., Flatgard, A., Hahn, S., Linehan, M., Wu, F. (2009). Artifact-based transformation of IBM Global Financing. In Business Process Management, LNCS(Vol. 5701, pp. 261-277). Heidelberg: Springer.
5. Eshuis, R., & van Gorp, P. (2012). Synthesizing object life cycles from business process models. In Conceptual Modeling, LNCS(Vol. 7532, pp. 307-320). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34002-4-24
6. Hull, R. (2008). Artifact-oriented business process models: brief survey of research results and challenges. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008, LNCS(Vol. 5332, pp. 1152-1163). Heidelberg: Springer.
7. Hull, R.,.. (2011). Introducing the Guard-Stage-Milestone approach for specifying business entity lifecycles. In Web Services and Formal Methods, LNCS(Vol. 6551, pp. 1-24). Heidelberg: Springer.
8. Kumaran, S., Liu, R., & Wu, F. Y. (2008). On the duality of information-oriented and activity-oriented models of business processes. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering, LNCS(Vol. 5074, pp. 32-47). Heidelberg: Springer.
9. Künzle, V., & Reichert, M. (2011). PHILharmonicFlows: Towards a framework for object-aware process management. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 23(4), 205-244. doi:10.1002/smr.524
10. Küster, J. M., Ryndina, K., & Gall, H. (2007). Generation of business process models for object life cycle compliance. In Business Process Management, LNCS(Vol. 4714, pp. 165-181). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0-13
11. Meyer, A., Pufahl, L., Fahland, D., & Weske, M. (2013). Modeling and enacting complex data dependencies in business processes. In Business Process Management, LNCS (Vol. 8094, pp. 171-186). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3-14
12. Meyer, A., & Weske, M. (2014). Activity-oriented and artifact-oriented process model roundtrip. In Business Process Management Workshops, LNBIP (Vol. 171, pp. 167-181). Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0-14
13. Müller, D., Reichert, M., & Herbst, J. (2007). Data-driven modeling and coordination of large process structures. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, GADA, and IS, LNCS (Vol. 4803, pp. 131-149). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7-10
14. Nigam, A., & Caswell, N. S. (2003). Business artifacts: An approach to operational specification. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 428-445. doi:10.1147/sj.423.0428
15. OMG-BPMN. (2014). Business Process Model and Notation, V.2.0.2. Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/
16. OMG-CMMN. (2014). Case Management Model and Notation, V.1.0. Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/spec/CMMN
17. OMG-OCL. (2014). Object Constraint Language, V.2.4. Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/2.4/
18. OMG-UML. (2015). Unified Modeling Language, V.2.5. Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5/
19. Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2007). Declare: Full support for loosely-structured processes.Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing (pp. 287-298). New York: IEEE Press. doi:10.1109/EDOC.2007.14
20. Ryndina, K., Küster, J. M., & Gall, H. (2007). Consistency of business process models and object life cycles. In Models in Software Engineering, LNCS(Vol. 4364, pp. 80-90). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69489-2-11
21. Sadiq, S., Orlowska, M., Sadiq, W., & Schulz, K. (2005). When workflows will not deliver: the case of contradicting work practice.Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Business Information Systems.
22. Sanz, J. L. C. (2011). Entity-oriented operations modeling for business process management-A multidisciplinary review of the state-of-the-art.Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Symposium on Service Oriented System Engineering (pp. 152-163). New York: IEEE Press.
23. Schonenberg, H., Mans, R., Russell, N., Mulyar, N., & van der Aalst, W. (2008). Process flexibility: A survey of contemporary approaches. In Advances in Enterprise Engineering I, LNBIP (Vol. 10, pp. 16-30). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68644-6-2
24. van der Aalst, W. M. P. (1997). Verification of workflow nets. In Application and Theory of Petri Nets 1997, LNCS (Vol. 1248, pp. 407-426). Heidelberg: Springer.
25. Wang, Z. (2014). How to guarantee compliance between workflows and product lifecycles? Information Systems, 42, 195-215. doi:10.1016/j.is.2014.01.006