Simple Empirical Guide to Pavement Design of Low-Volume Roads in Indiana

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2472, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 29-39

  Warith, Karim A Abdel ^a   Anastasopoulos, Panagiotis C ^b   Seidel, Joseph C ^c   Haddock, John E ^d  

^a Qatar University   (Qatar)

^b State University of New York   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; INVESTMENTS; ROADS AND STREETS;

ANNUAL INVESTMENTS; CRASH RATE; ECONOMIC STANDPOINTS; HIGH VOLUME ROADS; INDIANA; LOCAL AGENCIES; LOW VOLUME ROADS; PAVEMENT DESIGN; ROAD NETWORK; SIMPLE++;

DESIGN;

EID: 84993986041     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2472-04     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Behrens, I. L. C. Overview of Low-Volume Roads: Keynote Address. In Transportation Research Record 1652, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 1–4.
2. Muench, S. T., G. C. White, J. P. Mahoney, L. M. Pierce, and N. Sivaneswaren. Long-Lasting Low-Volume Pavements in Washington State. Proc., International Symposium on Design and Construction of Long Lasting Asphalt Pavements, International Society for Asphalt Pavements, Auburn, Ala., 2004, pp. 729–773.
3. Hall, K. D., and J. W. Bettis. Development of Comprehensive Low-Volume Pavement Design Procedures. MBTC 1070. Mack–Blackwell Rural Transportation Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 2000.
4. Low-Volume Road Safety. Road Management & Engineering Journal, Feb. 1, 1997. www.usroads.com/journals/rej/9702/re970204.htm. Accessed Oct. 10, 2012.
5. Faiz, A. Transportation Research Circular E-C167: The Promise of Rural Roads: Review of the Role of Low-Volume Roads in Rural Connectivity, Poverty Reduction, Crisis Management, and Livability. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012.
6. Thickness Design: Asphalt Pavements for Highways and Streets, 9th ed. MS-1. Asphalt Institute, Lexington, Ky., 1981.
7. Guidelines for Geometric Design of Very Low-Volume Local Roads (ADT ≤ 400). AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2001.
8. Habib, A., M. Hossain, R. Kaldate, and G. A. Fager. Comparison of Superpave and Marshall Mixtures for Low-Volume Roads and Shoulders. In Transportation Research Record 1609, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 44–50.
9. Hall, K. D., and S. Rao. Predicting Subgrade Moisture Content for Low-Volume Pavement Design Using In Situ Moisture Content Data. In Transportation Research Record 1652, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 98–107.
10. Adams, M., K. Ketchart, A. Ruckman, A. F. DiMillio, J. Wu, and R. Satyanarayana. Reinforced Soil for Bridge Support Applications on Low-Volume Roads. In Transportation Research Record 1652, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 150–160.
11. Tighe, S., Z. He, and R. Haas. Environmental Deterioration Model for Flexible Pavement Design: An Ontario Example. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1755, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 81–89.
12. Hall, K. D. Arkansas Superpave Seminars: Model Technology Transfer Partnership. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1848, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 101–105.
13. Titus-Glover, L., J. Mallela, M. I. Darter, G. Voigt, and S. Waalkes. Enhanced Portland Cement Concrete Fatigue Model for StreetPave. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1919, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 29–37.
14. de Solminihac, H. E., T. Echaveguren, and S. Vargas. Friction Reliability Criteria Applied to Horizontal Curve Design of Low-Volume Roads. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1989, Vol. 1, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 138–147.
15. Wilde, W. J. Thickness Design Method for Bituminous-Stabilized Aggregate-Surfaced Roads. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1989, Vol. 1, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 123–129.
16. Saboundjian, S., and R. L. McHattie. Alaska’s Dense-Graded High- Float Emulsion Surface Treatments: A New Mix Design. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1989, Vol. 2, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 161–168.
17. Perkins, S., and E. L. Cuelho. Mechanistic–Empirical Design Model Predictions for Base-Reinforced Pavements. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1989, Vol. 2, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 121–128.
18. Dell’Acqua, G., and F. Russo. Road Performance Evaluation Using Geometric Consistency and Pavement Distress Data. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2203, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 194–202.
19. Celaya, M., M. Veisi, S. Nazarian, and A. J. Puppala. Accelerated Moisture Conditioning Process of Lime-Stabilized Clays. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2204, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 130–139.
20. Praticò, F., S. Saride, and A. J. Puppala. Comprehensive Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Selection of Stabilization Alternatives for Better Performance of Low-Volume Roads. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2204, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 120–129.
21. van der Merwe Steyn, W. J., and A. T. Visser. Evaluation of Sustainability of Low-Volume Roads Treated with Nontraditional Stabilizers. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2204, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 186–193.
22. Hassan, H. F., and A. A. Al-Rawas. Laboratory Evaluation of Hot-Mix Asphalt Containing Petroleum-Contaminated Soil as a Surface Mix for Low-Volume Roads. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2205, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 11–19.
23. Mishra, D., E. Tutumluer, and G. Heckel. Performance Evaluation of Uncrushed Aggregates in Unsurfaced Road Applications Through Accelerated Pavement Testing. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2282, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 67–78.
24. Yoder, E. J., and A. A. Gadallah. Design of Low Volume Roads. JHRP- 74-11. Purdue University, Lafayette, Ind., and Indiana Department of Transportation, Indianapolis, 1974.
25. Flexible Pavement Design Guide for Highways, 2nd ed. National Crushed Stone Association, Washington, D.C., 1972.
26. NCSA Design Guide for Low Volume Rural Roads. National Crushed Stone Association, Washington, D.C., Feb. 1973.
27. Burnham, T. R. Application of Dynamic Cone Penetrometer to Minnesota Department of Transportation Pavement Assessment Procedures. MN/RC 97/19. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 1997.
28. Minnesota Pavement Design Manual. Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2010. www.dot.state.mn.us/materials/pvmtdesign/manual.html. Accessed Dec. 12, 2011.
29. Kim, J. R., and D. Newcomb. Low-Volume Road Pavement Design: A Review of Practice in the Upper Midwest. Report 91-3. Mountain– Plains Consortium, Fargo, N.D., 1991.
30. Packard, R. G. Thickness Design for Concrete Highway and Street Pavements. EB109. Portland Cement Association, 1984. www.fcpa.org/uploads/ThicknessDesignConcreteHwyStreetPavements.pdf.AccessedOct.10,2011.
31. Thickness Design for Soil–Cement Pavements. EB068. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Ill., 2001.
32. Thickness Design of a Roller-Compacted Concrete Composite Pavement System. PL633. Portland Cement Association, 2009. www.cement.org/bookstore/download.asp?mediatypeid=1&id=16949&itemid=PL633.AccessedOct.10,2011.
33. Shin, K. J., and N. Carboneau. The Indiana Technical Assistance Program Roller Compacted Concrete Pavement Manual for Local Government Agencies. TR-2-2010. Indiana Local Technical Assistance Program, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind., 2010.
34. Flexible Pavements for Roads, Streets, Walks, and Open Storage Areas. TM 5-822-5. Department of the Army, 1980.
35. Planning and Design of Roads, Airfields, and Heliports in the Theater of Operations: Road Design, Vol. I. 5-430-00-1. Department of the Army, 1994. www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/5-430-00-1/CH9.htm.AccessedOct.10,2011.
36. Webster, S. L., R. H. Grau, and T. P. Williams. Description and Application of Dual Mass Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. Report GL-92-3. Department of the Army, 1992.
37. Webster, S. L., R. W. Brown, and J. R. Porter. Force Projection Site Evaluation Using the Electric Cone Penetrometer (ECP) and the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP). GL-94-17. Air Force Civil Engineering Support Agency, Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla., 1994.
38. Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide, Interim Edition: A Manual of Practice. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2008.