Does increased forest protection correspond to higher fire severity in frequent-fire forests of the western United States?

Ecosphere

Volumn 7, Issue 10, 2016, Pages

  Bradley, Curtis M ^a   Hanson, Chad T ^b   DellaSala, Dominick A ^c  

^a Center for Biological Diversity   (United States)

^b Earth Island Institute   (United States)

^c GEOS INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Climate; Fire frequency; Fire severity; Fire suppression; Gap Analysis Program levels; Logging; Protected areas.

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993981966     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21508925     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1492     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Agee, J. K., and C. N. Skinner. 2005. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 211:83-96.
2. Ager, A. A., A. J. McMahan, J. J. Barrett, and C. W. McHugh. 2007. A simulation study of thinning and fuel treatments on a wildland-urban interface in eastern Oregon, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning 80:292-300.
3. Baker, W. L. 2015. Are high-severity fires burning at much higher rates recently than historically in dry-forest landscapes of the Western USA? PLoS ONE 10:e0141936.
4. Bessie, W. C., and E. A. Johnson. 1995. The relative importance of fuels and weather on fire behavior in subalpine forests. Ecology 76:747-762.
5. Breiman, L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45:5-32.
6. Breiman, L., J. Freidman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Belmont, California, USA.
7. Countryman, C. M. 1956. Old growth conversion also converts fire climate. Fire Control Notes 17: 15-19.
8. Cutler, D. R., T. C. Edwards, K. H. Beard, A. Cutler, K. T. Hess, J. Gibson, and J. J. Lawler. 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783-2792.
9. DellaSala, D. A., M. L. Bond, C. T. Hanson, R. L. Hutto, and D. C. Odion. 2014. Complex early seral forests of the Sierra Nevada: What are they and how can they be managed for ecological integrity? Natural Areas Journal 34:310-324.
10. DellaSala, D. A., and C. T. Hanson. 2015a. Ecological and biodiversity benefits of megafires. Pages 23-54 in D. A. DellaSala and C. T. Hanson, editors. The ecological importance of mixed-severity fires: nature's phoenix. Elsevier, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
11. DellaSala, D. A., and C. T. Hanson, editors. 2015b. The ecological importance of mixed-severity fires: nature's phoenix. Elsevier, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
12. DellaSala, D. A., D. B. Lindenmayer, C. T. Hanson, and J. Furnish. 2015. In the aftermath of fire: Logging and related actions degrade mixed-And high-severity burn areas. Pages 313-347 in D. A. DellaSala and C. T. Hanson, editors. The ecological importance of mixed-severity fires: nature's phoenix. Elsevier, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
13. Dennison, P. E., S. C. Brewer, J. D. Arnold, and M. A. Moritz. 2014. Large wildfire trends in the western United States, 1984-2011. Geophysical Research Letters 41:2928-2933.
14. Dillon, G. K., Z. A. Holden, P. Morgan, M. A. Crimmins, E. K. Heyerdahl, and C. H. Luce. 2011. Both topography and climate affected forest and woodland burn severity in two regions of the western US, 1984 to 2006. Ecosphere 2:130.
15. Donato, D. C., J. L. Campbell, and J. F. Franklin. 2012. Multiple successional pathways and precocity in forest development: Can some forests be born complex? Journal of Vegetation Science 23:576-584.
16. Dunn, C. J., and J. D. Bailey. 2016. Tree mortality and structural change following mixed-severity fire in Pseudotsuga forests of Oregon's western Cascades, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 365: 107-118.
17. Eidenshink, J., B. Schwind, K. Brewer, Z. Zhu, B. Quayle, and S. Howard. 2007. A project for monitoring trends in burn severity. Fire Ecology 3:3-21.
18. ESRI. 2014. ArcGIS desktop: release 10.3. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California, USA.
19. Hanson, C. T. 2014. Conservation concerns for Sierra Nevada birds associated with high-severity fire. Western Birds 45:204-212.
20. Hanson, C. T. 2015. Use of higher-severity fire areas by female Pacific fishers on the Kern Plateau, Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Wildlife Society Bulletin 39:497-502.
21. Hanson, C. T., and D. C. Odion. 2016. Historical forest conditions within the range of the Pacific Fisher and Spotted Owl in the central and southern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Natural Areas Journal 36:8-19.
22. Hanson, C. T., D. C. Odion, D. A. DellaSala, and W. L. Baker. 2009. Overestimation of fire risk in the Northern Spotted Owl recovery plan. Conservation Biology 23:1314-1319.
23. Healthy Forest Restoration Act. 2003. P.L. 108-148. https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-congress/house-bill/1904
24. Hély, C., M. Flannigan, Y. Bergeron, and D. McRae. 2001. Role of vegetation and weather on fire behavior in the Canadian mixedwood boreal forest using two fire behavior prediction systems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31:430-441.
25. Hessburg, P. F., et al. 2016. Tamm review: management of mixed-severity fire regime forests in Oregon, Washington, and northern California. Forest Ecology and Management 366:221-250.
26. HR 167: Wildfire Disaster Funding Act. 2015. S.235. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/235
27. Ingalsbee, T., and U. Raja. 2015. The rising costs of wildfire suppression and the case for ecological fire use. Pages 348-371 in D. A. DellaSala and C. T. Hanson, editors. The ecological importance of mixed-severity fires: nature's phoenix. Elsevier, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
28. Ishwaran, H., and U. B. Kogalur. 2016. Random forests for survival, regression and classification (RF-SRC). R package version 2.0.7. https://cran.r-project.org/package=randomForestSRC
29. Kalies, E. L., and L. L. Yocum Kent. 2016. Tamm review: Are fuel treatments effective at achieving ecological and social objectives? A systematic review. Forest Ecology and Management 375:84-95.
30. Kane, V. A., C. A. Cansler, N. A. Povak, J. T. Kane, R. J. McGaughey, J. A. Lutz, D. J. Churchill, and M. P. North. 2015. Mixed severity fire effects within the Rim fire: relative importance of local climate, fire weather, topography, and forest structure. Forest Ecology and Management 358:62-79.
31. Key, C. H., and N. C. Benson. 2006. Landscape assessment: sampling and analysis methods. Pages 1-55 in D. C. Lutes, R. E. Keane, J. F. Caratti, C. H. Key, N. C. Benson, S. Sutherland, and L. J. Gangi, editors. FIREMON: fire effects monitoring and inventory system. General Technical Report RMRSGTR-164-CD. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
32. Lydersen, J. M., M. P. North, and B. M. Collins. 2014. Severity of an uncharacteristically large wildfire, the Rim Fire, in forests with relatively restored frequent fire regimes. Forest Ecology and Management 328:326-334.
33. Miller, J. D., E. E. Knapp, C. H. Key, C. N. Skinner, C. J. Isbell, R. M. Creasy, and J. W. Sherlock. 2009a. Calibration and validation of the relative differenced normalized burn ratio (RdNBR) to three measures of fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Klamath Mountains, California, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment 113:645-656.
34. Miller, J. D., and H. Safford. 2012. Trends in wildfire severity: 1984 to 2010 in the Sierra Nevada, Modoc Plateau, and southern Cascades, California, USA. Fire Ecology 8:41-57.
35. Miller, J. D., H. D. Safford, M. Crimmins, and A. E. Thode. 2009b. Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 12:16-32.
36. Miller, J. D., C. N. Skinner, H. D. Safford, E. E. Knapp, and C. M. Ramirez. 2012. Trends and causes of severity, size, and number of fires in northwestern California, USA. Ecological Applications 22: 184-203.
37. Miller, J. D., and A. E. Thode. 2007. Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta normalized burn ratio (dNBR). Remote Sensing of Environment 109: 66-80.
38. Moritz, M. A., et al. 2014. Learning to coexist with wildfire. Nature 515:58-66.
39. Moritz, M. A., and S. G. Knowles. 2016. Coexisting with wildfire. American Scientist 104:220-227.
40. North, M., A. Brough, J. Long, B. Collins, P. Bowden, D. Yasuda, J. Miller, and N. Sugihara. 2015. Constraints on mechanized treatment significantly limits mechanical fuels reduction extent in the Sierra Nevada. Journal of Forestry 113:40-48.
41. North, M., P. Stine, K. O'Hara, W. Zielinski, and S. Stephens. 2009. An ecosystem management strategy for Sierran mixed-conifer forests. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-220, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, California, USA.
42. Norton, J., N. Glenn, M. Germino, K. Weber, and S. Seefeldt. 2009. Relative suitability of indices derived from Landsat ETM+ and SPOT 5 for detecting fire severity in sagebrush steppe. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 11:360-367.
43. Odion, D. C., E. J. Frost, J. R. Strittholt, H. Jiang, D. A. DellaSala, and M. A. Moritz. 2004. Patterns of fire severity and forest conditions in the Klamath Mountains, northwestern California. Conservation Biology 18:927-936.
44. Odion, D. C., and C. T. Hanson. 2006. Fire severity in conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada, California. Ecosystems 9:1177-1189.
45. Odion, D. C., and C. T. Hanson. 2008. Fire severity in the Sierra Nevada revisited: conclusions robust to further analysis. Ecosystems 11:12-15.
46. Odion, D. C., M. A. Moritz, and D. A. DellaSala. 2010. Alternative community states maintained by fire in the Klamath Mountains, USA. Journal of Ecology 98:96-105.
47. Odion, D. C., et al. 2014. Examining historical and current mixed-severity fire regimes in ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of Western North America. PLoS ONE 9:e87852.
48. Odion, D. C., C. T. Hanson, W. L. Baker, D. A. DellaSala, and M. A. Williams. 2016. Areas of agreement and disagreement regarding ponderosa pine and mixed conifer forest fire regimes: A dialogue with Stevens et al. PLoS ONE 11:e0154579.
49. Paradis, E., J. Claude, and K. Strimmer. 2004. APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290.
50. Parks, S. A., C. Miller, J. T. Abatzoglou, L. M. Holsinger, M.-A. Parisien, and S. Z. Dobrowski. 2016. How will climate change affect wildland fire severity in the western US? Environmental Research Letters 11:035002
51. Parks, S. A., C. Miller, M.-A. Parisien, L. M. Holsinger, S. Z. Dobrowski, and J. Abatzoglou. 2015. Wildland fire deficit and surplus in the western United States, 1984-2012. Ecosphere 6:275.
52. Peterson, D. W., E. K. Dodson, and R. J. Harrod. 2015. Post-fire logging reduces surface woody fuels up to four decades following wildfire. Forest Ecology and Management 338:84-91.
53. Picotte, J. J., B. Peterson, G. Meier, and S. M. Howard. 2016. 1984-2010 trends in burn severity and area for the conterminous US. International Journal of Wildland Fire 25:413-420.
54. Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, D. Sarkar, and R Core Team. 2015. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-120. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
55. R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
56. Raymond, C. L., and D. L. Peterson. 2005. Fuel treatments alter the effects of wildfire in a mixed-evergreen forest, Oregon, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35:2981-2995.
57. Rhodes, J. J., and W. L. Baker. 2008. Fire probability, fuel treatment effectiveness and ecological tradeoffs in western U.S. public forests. Open Forest Science Journal 1:1-7.
58. Rollins, M. G. 2009. LANDFIRE: A nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18: 235-249.
59. Schoennagel, T., T. T. Veblen, and W. H. Romme. 2004. The interaction of fire, fuels, and climate across Rocky Mountain forests. BioScience 54:661-676.
60. Sherriff, R. L., R. V. Platt, T. T. Veblen, T. L. Schoennagel, and M. H. Gartner. 2014. Historical, observed, and modeled wildfire severity in montane forests of the Colorado Front Range. PLoS ONE 9:e106971.
61. Spies, T. A., M. A. Hemstrom, A. Younglodd, and S. S. Hummel. 2006. Conserving old-growth forest diversity in disturbance-prone landscapes. Conservation Biology 20:351-362.
62. Stephens, S. L., J. K. Agee, P. Z. Fulé, M. P. North, W. H. Romme, T. W. Swetnam, and M. G. Turner. 2013. Managing forests and fire in changing climates. Science 342:41-42.
63. Stephens, S. L., and B. M. Collins. 2004. Fire regimes of mixed conifer forests in the north-central Sierra Nevada at multiple spatial scales. Northwest Science 78:12-23.
64. Stephens, S. L., J. M. Lydersen, B. M. Collins, D. L. Fry, and M. D. Meyer. 2015. Historical and current landscape-scale ponderosa pine and mixed conifer forest structure in the Southern Sierra Nevada. Ecosphere 6:79.
65. Stephens, S. L., and J. J. Moghaddas. 2005. Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a mixed conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 215:21-36.
66. Stephens, S. L., et al. 2009. Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western U.S. forests. Ecological Applications 19:305-320.
67. Swanson, M. E., J. F. Franklin, R. L. Beschta, C. M. Crisafulli, D. A. DellaSala, R. L. Hutto, D. Lindenmayer, and F. J. Swanson. 2011. The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9:117-125.
68. Swetnam, T., and C. Baisan. 1996. Historical fire regime patterns in the southwestern United States since AD 1700. Pages 11-32 in C. D. Allen, editor. Fire Effects in Southwestern Forests: Proceedings of the 2nd La Mesa Fire Symposium. General Technical Report RM-GTR-286. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
69. Taylor, A. H., and C. N. Skinner. 1998. Fire history and landscape dynamics in a late-successional reserve, Klamath Mountains, California, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 111:285-301.
70. Tepley, A. J., and T. T. Veblen. 2015. Spatiotemporal fire dynamics in mixed-conifer and aspen forests in the San Juan Mountains of southwestern Colorado, USA. Ecological Monographs 85:583-603.
71. Thompson, J. R., T. A. Spies, and L. M. Ganio. 2007. Reburn severity in managed and unmanaged vegetation in a large wildfire. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:10743-10748.
72. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2013. Level III ecoregions of the conterminous United States.
73. U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD)-National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL). ftp://ftp.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/us/Eco-Level-III-US.html
74. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Gap Analysis Program (GAP). 2012. Protected areas database of the United States (PADUS) version 1.3. http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/PADUS/o
75. USDA Forest Service. 2002. National fire plan. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/budgetoffice/NFP-final32601.pdf
76. USDA Forest Service. 2004. Sierra Nevada forest plan amendment, final environmental impact statement and record of decision. U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Vallejo, California, USA.
77. USDA Forest Service. 2009. The National Strategy: The final phase in the development of the national cohesive wildland fire management strategy. https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/strategy/thestrategy.shtml
78. USDA Forest Service. 2014. Scoping notice for forest plan revisions, Sierra, Inyo, and Sequoia National Forests (August 25, 2014). U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Vallejo, California, USA.
79. USDA Forest Service. 2015. Final environmental impact statement for the four-forest restoration initiative, with errata and objection resolution modifications. U.S. Forest Service, Coconino and Kaibab National Forests, Flagstaff, Arizona.
80. USDA Forest Service. 2016. Blue Mountains forest resiliency project, notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. U.S. Forest Service, Umatilla, Ochoco, and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests, Pendleton, Oregon.
81. van Wagtendonk, J. W., K. A. van Wagtendonk, and A. E. Thode. 2012. Factors associated with the severity of intersecting fires in Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Fire Ecology 8: 11-32.
82. Whitlock, C., D. A. DellaSala, S. Wolf, and C. T. Hanson. 2015. Climate change: uncertainties, shifting baselines, and fire management. Pages 265-289 in D. A. DellaSala and C. T. Hanson, editors. The ecological importance of mixed-severity fires: nature's phoenix. Elsevier, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
83. Williams, M. A., and W. L. Baker. 2012a. Spatially extensive reconstructions show variable-severity fire and heterogeneous structure in historical western United States dry forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21:1042-1052.
84. Williams, M. A., and W. L. Baker. 2012b. Comparison of the higher-severity fire regime in historical (A.D. 1800s) and modern (A.D. 1984-2009) montane forests across 624, 156 ha of the Colorado Front Range. Ecosystems 15:832-847.
85. Wimberly, M. C., M. A. Cochrane, A. D. Baer, and K. Pabst. 2009. Assessing fuel treatment effectiveness using satellite imagery and spatial statistics. Ecological Applications 19:1377-1384.