Consensus intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making method for aircraft cockpit display and control system evaluation

Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 634-641

  Geng, Tao ^a   Zhang, An ^a   Lu, Guangshan ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Aircraft cockpit display and control system (ACDCS); Different preference representation; Group decision making (GDM); Intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS); Weighted averaging (WA) operator

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT CONTROL; COCKPITS (AIRCRAFT); CONTROL SYSTEMS; ERGONOMICS; FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS; FUZZY SETS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

COCKPIT DISPLAY; GROUP DECISION MAKING; INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS; PREFERENCE REPRESENTATION; WEIGHTED AVERAGING;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84993928882     PISSN: 16711793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/JSEE.2013.00074     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. D. Karikawa, M Takahashi. A. Ishibashi, et al. Human-machine system simulation for supporting the design and evaluation of reliable aircraft cockpit interface. Proc. of SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference, 2006: 55-60.
2. M. B. Senol, M. Dagdeviren, M. Kurt, et al. Evaluation of cockpit design by using quantitative and qualitative tools. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2009: 847-851.
3. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Chiclana. Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129(2): 372-385.
4. E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera, F. Chiclana. A consensus model for multi person decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 2002, 32(3): 394-402.
5. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, J. L. Verdegay. A linguistic decision process in group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1996,5(1): 165-176.
6. J. J. Zhu, S. X. Liu, M. G. Wang. Integration of weights model of interval numbers comparison matrix. Acta Automati-ca Sinica, 2005, 31 (3): 6-11. (in Chinese)
7. L. Mikhailov. A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 159(3): 687-704.
8. Y. M. Wang, J. B. Yang, D. L. Xu. A two-stage logarithmic goal programming methods for generating weights from interval comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2005, 152(1): 475-498.
9. Z. S. Xu, J. Chen. MAGDM linear-programming models with distinct uncertain preference structures. IEEE Trans, on System, Man and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, 2008, 38(5): 1356-1370.
10. C. T. Chen. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decisionmaking under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114(1): 1-9.
11. Z. S. Xu. Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(11): 2363-2379.
12. G. Y. Bao, X. L. Lian. M. He, et al. Improved two-tuple linguistic representation model based on linguistic evaluation scale. Control and Decision, 2010, 25(5): 780-784. (in Chinese)
13. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma. Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 115(1): 67-82.
14. E. Herrera-Viedma, S. Alonso, F. Chiclana, et al. A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans, on Fuzzy Systems, 2007, 15(5): 863.
15. F. Herrera, L. Martinez, P. J. Sanchez. Managing nonhomoge-neous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 166(1): 115-132.
16. J. Ma, Z. P. Fan, Y. P. Jiang, et al. An optimization approach to multiperson decision making based on different formats of preference information. IEEE Trans, on System, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 2006, 36(5): 876-889.
17. Z. S. Xu, X. Q. Cai, S. S. Liu. Nonlinear programming model integrating different preference structures. IEEE Trans, on System, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 2011, 41(1): 169-177.
18. C. Shi, Y. M. Cheng, Q. Pan. A method to aggregate hybrid preference information based on intuitionistic fuzzy and evidence theory. Control and Decision, 2012, 27(8): 1163-1168.
19. Y. J. Si, F. J. Wei. Hybrid multi-attribute decision mak- ing based on the intuitionistic fuzzy optimum selecting model. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(12): 2893-2987. (in Chinese)
20. Z. S. Xu. Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations. Information Sciences, 2008, 178(2): 452-J67.
21. F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera, et al. Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research. 2007, 182(1): 383-399.
22. Q. S. Zhang, S. Y. Jiang. A note on information entropy measures for vague sets and its applications. Information Sciences, 2008, 178(21): 4184-4191.
23. F. E. Boran, S. Gene, M. Kurt, et al. A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(8): 11363-11368.
24. Z. S. Xu. A direct approach to group decision making with uncertain additive linguistic preference relations. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2006, 5(1): 21-32.
25. H. Y. Chen, C. Chen. Research on compatibility and consistency of combination judgement matrices based on IIOWG operators. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(9): 2137-2140. (in Chinese)
26. J. Ye. Improved method of multicriteria fuzzy decision making based on vague sets. Computer-Aided Design, 2007, 39(2): 164-169.