Integration of weights model of interval numbers comparison matrix

Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Automatica Sinica

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 434-439

  Zhu, Jian Jun ^a   Liu, Shi Xin ^b   Wang, Meng Guang ^b  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NANJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS   (China)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy process; Genetic algorithm; Integration weights model; Interval number comparison matrix; Weights feasible region

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; RANDOM PROCESSES; THEOREM PROVING;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESSES; CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS; INTEGRATION WEIGHTS MODELS; INTERVAL NUMBER COMPARISON MATRICES; POSSIBLE VALUE MODELS; UNCERTAINTY DECISION MAKING; WEIGHTS ESTIMATION; WEIGHTS FEASIBLE REGIONS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 20544445015     PISSN: 02544156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Xu Shu-Bai. Theory of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Tianjin: Tianjin University Publishing House, 1986, 1-13
2. Saaty T. Decision making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 145(1): 85-91
3. Tam M, Tummala V. An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega, 2001, 29(2): 171-182
4. Wei Y, Liu J, Wang X. Concept of consistence and weights of the judgement matrix in the uncertain type of AHP. Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 1994, 22(4): 16-22
5. Bryson N, Joseph A. Generating consensus priority interval vectors for group decision-making in the AHP. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2000, 9(4): 127-137
6. Leung L, Cao D. On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 124(1): 102-113
7. Wang L, He G, Li J. Convex cone model for interval judgments in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Systems Engineering, 1997, 12(3): 39-48
8. Haines L. A statistical approach to the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgments (I) distributions on feasible regions. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 110(1): 112-125
9. Lipovetsky S, Tishler A. Interval estimation of priorities in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 114(1): 153-164
10. Byeong S. The analytic hierarchy process in an uncertain environment: A simulation approach by Hauser and Tadikamalla (1996). European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 124(1): 217-218
11. Mikhailov L. Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises. Omega, 2002, 30(5): 393-401
12. Buckley J, Feuring T, Hayashi Y. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129(1): 48-64
13. Finan J, Hurley W. The analytic hierarchy process: Does adjusting a pairwise comparison matrix to improve the consistency ratio help? Computer and Operation Research, 1997, 24(8): 749-755
14. Chen S. Evaluating weapon systems using fuzzy arithmetic operations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 77(3): 265-276