Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Residential Preferences, Residential Mobility, and Neighborhood Change

Sociological Methodology

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 103-154

  Bruch, Elizabeth E ^a   Mare, Robert D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrete choice modeling; residential segregation; social dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993830053     PISSN: 00811750     EISSN: 14679531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0081175012444105     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Chen C. C. Singh S. 2010. “Pseudo Bayes and Pseudo Empirical Bayes Estimators Using Unrelated Question Randomized Response Sampling.” Poster presented at Frontiers of Statistical Decision Making and Bayesian Analysis, San Antonio, TX.
2. Christofides T. C. 2010. “Comments on a Method of Comparison of Randomized Response Techniques.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 140:574-75.
3. Gjestvang C. R. Singh S. 2006. “A New Randomized Response Model.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 68:523-30.
4. Guerriero M. Sandri M. F. 2007. “A Note on the Comparison of Some Randomized Response Procedures.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 137:2184-190.
5. Odumade O. Singh S. 2009. “Efficient Use of Two Decks of Cards in Randomized Response Sampling.” Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 38:439-46.
6. Odumade O. Singh S. 2010. “An Alternative to the Bar-Lev, Bobovitch and Boukai Randomized Response Model.” Sociological Methods & Research 39:206-21.
7. Peeters C. F. W. Lensvelt-Mulders G. J. L. M. Lasthuizen K. 2010. “A Note on a Simple and Practical Randomized Response Framework for Eliciting Sensitive Dichotomous and Quantitative Information.” Sociological Methods & Research 39:283-96.
8. Singh S. 2010. “Proposed Optimal Orthogonal New Additive Model (POONAM).” Statistica, anno LXX, n.1:73-81.
9. Warner S. L. 1965. “Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 60:63-69.