A note on the comparison of some randomized response procedures

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 137, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 2184-2190

  Guerriero, Massimo ^a   Sandri, Marco F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Efficiency; Privacy protection; Randomized response

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947279872     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2006.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bhargava, M., Singh, R., 2000. A modified randomization device for Warner's model. Statistica Anno LX(2), 315-321.
2. Bhargava M., and Singh R. On the efficiency comparison of certain randomized response strategies. Metrika 55 (2002) 191-197
3. Chang H.-J., and Liang D.-H. A two-stage unrelated randomized response procedure. Austral. J. Statist. 38 (1996) 43-51
4. Chang H.-J., Wang C.-L., and Huang K.-C. On estimating the proportion of a qualitative sensitive character using randomized response sampling. Quality & Quantity 38 (2004) 675-680
5. Christofides C. A generalized randomized response technique. Metrika 57 (2003) 195-200
6. Greenberg B.G., Abul-Ela A.A., Simmons W.R., and Horvitz D.G. The unrelated question randomized response model: theoretical frameworks. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 64 (1969) 520-539
7. van der Heijden P.G.M., van Gils G., Bouts J., and Hox J.J. A comparison of randomized response, computer-assisted self-interview, and face-to-face direct questioning. Eliciting sensitive information in the context of welfare and unemployment benefit. Sociological Methods & Res. 28 (2000) 505-537
8. van den Hout A., and van der Heijden P.G.M. Randomized response, statistical disclosure control and misclassification: a review. Internat. Statist. Rev. 70 (2002) 269-288
9. Kuk A.Y.C. Asking sensitive questions indirectly. Biometrika 77 (1990) 436-438
10. Lanke J. On the degree of protection in randomized interviews. Internat. Statist. Rev. 44 (1976) 197-203
11. Leysieffer F.W., and Warner S.L. Respondent jeopardy and optimal designs in randomized response models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 71 (1976) 649-656
12. Ljungqvist L. A unified approach to measures of privacy in randomized response models: a utilitarian perspective. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 88 (1993) 97-103
13. Mangat N.S. An improved randomized response strategy. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 56 (1994) 93-95
14. Mangat N.S., and Singh R. An alternative randomized response procedure. Biometrika 77 (1990) 439-442
15. Mangat N.S., Singh S., and Singh R. On use of a modified randomization device in Warner's model. J. Indian Soc. Statist. Oper. Res. 16 (1990) 627-629
16. Nayak T.K. On randomized response surveys for estimating a proportion. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 23 (1994) 3303-3321
17. Warner S.L. Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 60 (1965) 63-69
18. Zou G. Two-stage randomized response procedures as single stage procedures. Austral. J. Statist. 39 (1997) 235-236