Understanding Cognitive Strategy With Adaptive Automation in Dual-Task Performance Using Computational Cognitive Models

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 309-331

  Kaber, David B ^a   Kim, Sang Hwan ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN   (United States)

Author keywords

adaptive automation; auditory cues; cognitive models; flight simulation; manual control deficits; mode transitions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993811853     PISSN: 15553434     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1555343411416442     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson J. R. Bothell D. Byrne M. D. Douglass S. Lebiere C. Qin Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036-1060.
2. Bailey N. R. Scerbo M. W. Freeman F. G. Mikulka P. J. Scott L. A. (2006). Comparison of a brain-based adaptive system and a manual adaptable system for invoking automation. Human Factors, 48, 693-709.
3. Ballas J. A. Heitmeyer C. L. Perez M. A. (1992). Evaluating two aspects of direct manipulation in advanced cockpits. In Proceedings of the CHI -92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 127-134). New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
4. Billings C. E. Woods D. D. (1994). Concerns about adaptive automation in aviation systems. In Mouloua M., Parasuraman R.,(Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 264-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Card S. K. Moran T. P. Newell A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Endsley M. R. Kaber D. B. (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42, 462-492.
7. Gray W. D. John B. E. Atwood M. E. (1993). Project Ernestine: A validation of GOMS for prediction and explanation of real-world task performance. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 237-309.
8. Hadley G. A. Prinzel L. J. Freeman F. G. Mikulka P. J. (1999). Behavioral, subjective and psychophysiological correlates of various schedules of short-cycle automation. In Scerbo M. W., Mouloua M.,(Eds.), Automation technology and human performance (pp. 139-143). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. John B. E. Vera A. (1992). A GOMS analysis of a graphic, machine-paced, highly interactive task. In Proceedings of CHI '92 (pp. 626-633). New York: ACM.
10. Kaber D. B. Riley J. M. (1999). Adaptive automation of a dynamic control task based on secondary task workload measurement. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3, 169-187.
11. Kaber D. B. Wang X. Kim S.-H. (2006). Computational cognitive modeling of operator behavior in telerover navigation. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on System, Man, and Cybernetics (pp. 3210-3125). Taipei, Taiwan.
12. Kaber D. B. Wang X. Kim S.-H. (2011). Computational cognitive modeling of human-robot interaction using a GOMS methodology. In Wang X.,(Ed.), Mixed reality and human robot interaction (pp. 53-75). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
13. Kaber D. B. Wright M. C. (2003). Automation-state changes and sensory cueing in telerobot control. In Proceeding of the XVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (CD-ROM). Seoul, Korea.
14. Kessel C. J. Wickens C. D. (1982). The transfer of failure-detection skills between monitoring and controlling dynamic systems. Human Factors, 24, 49-60.
15. Kieras D. E. (1997). A guide to GOMS model usability evaluation using NGOMSL. In Helander M., Landauer T. K., Prabhu P.,(Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 733-766). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
16. Kieras D. E. (1998). A guide to GOMS model usability evaluation using GOMSL and GLEAN3 (Tech. Rep. No. 38, TR-98/ARPA-2). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department.
17. Kieras D. E. Meyer D. E. (1995). Predicting human performance in dual-task tracking and decision making with computational models using the EPIC architecture. In Proceedings of the 1995 International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology (pp. 1-12). Washington, DC: National Defense University.
18. Kieras D. E. Wood S. D. Abotel K. Hornof A. (1995). GLEAN: A computer-based tool for rapid GOMS model usability evaluation of user interface designs. In UIST95, Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 91-100). New York, NY: ACM.
19. Newman W. M. Lamming M. G. (1995). Interactive System Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. Olson J. R. Olson G. M. (1990). The growth of cognitive modeling in human-computer interaction since GOMS. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 221-265.
21. Parasuraman R. Mouloua M. Molloy R. (1996). Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Human Factors, 38, 665-679.
22. Parasuraman R. Sheridan T. B. Wickens C. D. (2000). A model of types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, 30, 286-297.
23. Sarter N. B. Woods D. D. (1995). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37, 5-19.
24. Sklar A. E. Sarter N. B. (1999). Good vibrations: Tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domains. Human Factors, 41, 534-552.
25. Soar Technology. (2005). EGLEAN science and technology report: The first six months. Ann Arbor, MI: Author.
26. Trafton J. G. Altmann E. M. Brock D. P. Mintz F. E. (2003). Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 583-603.
27. Wickens C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance. Columbus, OH: Merrill.