So you call that research? Mending methodological biases in strategy and organization departments of top business schools

Strategic Organization

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 117-128

  Heugens, Pursey P M A R ^a   Mol, Michael J ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993791740     PISSN: 14761270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1476127005050030     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Baum, J. A. C., Greenwood, R. and Jennings, P. D. (2003) ‘Welcome to Strategic Organization - SO!’, Strategic Organization 1(1): 5-8.
2. Campbell, D. T. (1975) ‘Degrees of Freedom and the Case Study’, Comparative Political Studies 8(1): 178-191.
3. Campbell, D. T. and Stanley, J. C. (1966) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
4. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2000) The Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Dillman, D. A. (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.
6. Durkheim, E. (1951 / 1897) Suicide: A Study in Sociology. New York: The Free Press.
7. Eckstein, H. (1975) ‘Case Study and Theory in Political Science’, in F. J. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby (eds) Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 7, pp. 79-137. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) ‘Building Theories from Case Study Research’, Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532-550.
9. Flyvbjerg, B. (2004) ‘Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research’, in C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium and D. Silverman (eds) Qualitative Research Practice, pp. 420-434. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Gerring, J. (2004) ‘What is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?’, American Political Science Review 98(2): 341-354.
11. Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Lewis-Beck, M. S., ed. (1987-2004) Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences (Sage University Paper Series). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Moldoveanu, M. C. and Baum, J. A. C. (2002) ‘Contemporary Debates in Organizational Epistemology’, in J. A. C. Baum (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, pp. 733-751. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Ostrom, E. (1998) ‘A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action’. Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review 92(1): 1-22.
15. Sigelman, L. (2004) ‘Report of the Editor of the American Political Science Review, 2002-2003’, PS: Political Science and Politics 37(January): 113-117.
16. van de Ven, A. H. (2002) ‘Presidential Address: Strategic Directions for the Academy of Management: This Academy Is for You!’, Academy of Management Review 27(2): 171-184.